A graphical comparison of designs for response optimization based on slope estimation

The response surface problem is two-fold: to predict values of the response, and to optimize the response. Slope estimation criteria are well suited for the optimization problem. Response prediction capability has been assessed by plotting the average, maximum, and minimum prediction variances on th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hockman, Kimberly Kearns
Other Authors: Statistics
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/54384
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-54384
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-543842020-12-19T05:31:58Z A graphical comparison of designs for response optimization based on slope estimation Hockman, Kimberly Kearns Statistics LD5655.V856 1989.H624 Factorial experiment designs Response surfaces (Statistics) The response surface problem is two-fold: to predict values of the response, and to optimize the response. Slope estimation criteria are well suited for the optimization problem. Response prediction capability has been assessed by plotting the average, maximum, and minimum prediction variances on the surface of spheres with radii ranging across the region of interest. Average and maximum prediction bias plots have recently been added to the spherical criteria. Combined with the prediction variance, a graphical MSE criterion results. This research extends these ideas to the slope estimation objective. A direct relationship between precise slope estimation and the ability to pinpoint the location of the optimum is developed, resulting in a general slope variance measure related to E-optimality in slope estimation. A more specific slope variance measure is defined and analyzed for use in evaluating standard response surface (RS) designs,where slopes parallel to the factor axes are estimated with equal precision. Standard second order RS designs are then studied in light of the prediction and optimization goal distinction. Designs which perform well for prediction of the response do not necessarily estimate the slope precisely. A spherical measure of bias in slope estimation is developed and used to measure slope bias due to model misspecification and due to the presence of outliers. A study of augmenting saturated orthogonal arrays of strength two to detect lack of fit is included as an application of a combined squared bias and variance measure of MSE in slope. A study of the designs recommended for precise slope estimation in their robustness to outliers and to missing observations is conducted using the slope bias and general slope variance measures, respectively. Ph. D. 2015-07-10T19:59:56Z 2015-07-10T19:59:56Z 1989 Dissertation Text http://hdl.handle.net/10919/54384 en_US OCLC# 19788805 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ ix, 135 leaves application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LD5655.V856 1989.H624
Factorial experiment designs
Response surfaces (Statistics)
spellingShingle LD5655.V856 1989.H624
Factorial experiment designs
Response surfaces (Statistics)
Hockman, Kimberly Kearns
A graphical comparison of designs for response optimization based on slope estimation
description The response surface problem is two-fold: to predict values of the response, and to optimize the response. Slope estimation criteria are well suited for the optimization problem. Response prediction capability has been assessed by plotting the average, maximum, and minimum prediction variances on the surface of spheres with radii ranging across the region of interest. Average and maximum prediction bias plots have recently been added to the spherical criteria. Combined with the prediction variance, a graphical MSE criterion results. This research extends these ideas to the slope estimation objective. A direct relationship between precise slope estimation and the ability to pinpoint the location of the optimum is developed, resulting in a general slope variance measure related to E-optimality in slope estimation. A more specific slope variance measure is defined and analyzed for use in evaluating standard response surface (RS) designs,where slopes parallel to the factor axes are estimated with equal precision. Standard second order RS designs are then studied in light of the prediction and optimization goal distinction. Designs which perform well for prediction of the response do not necessarily estimate the slope precisely. A spherical measure of bias in slope estimation is developed and used to measure slope bias due to model misspecification and due to the presence of outliers. A study of augmenting saturated orthogonal arrays of strength two to detect lack of fit is included as an application of a combined squared bias and variance measure of MSE in slope. A study of the designs recommended for precise slope estimation in their robustness to outliers and to missing observations is conducted using the slope bias and general slope variance measures, respectively. === Ph. D.
author2 Statistics
author_facet Statistics
Hockman, Kimberly Kearns
author Hockman, Kimberly Kearns
author_sort Hockman, Kimberly Kearns
title A graphical comparison of designs for response optimization based on slope estimation
title_short A graphical comparison of designs for response optimization based on slope estimation
title_full A graphical comparison of designs for response optimization based on slope estimation
title_fullStr A graphical comparison of designs for response optimization based on slope estimation
title_full_unstemmed A graphical comparison of designs for response optimization based on slope estimation
title_sort graphical comparison of designs for response optimization based on slope estimation
publisher Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/54384
work_keys_str_mv AT hockmankimberlykearns agraphicalcomparisonofdesignsforresponseoptimizationbasedonslopeestimation
AT hockmankimberlykearns graphicalcomparisonofdesignsforresponseoptimizationbasedonslopeestimation
_version_ 1719370943646662656