Performance Evaluation of a Low Impact Development Retrofit for Urban Stormwater Treatment

The goal of Low Impact Development (LID) is to mimic the pre-development hydrologic regime of a catchment through infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation, and detention of post-development runoff using small-scale hydrologic controls close to the source. A LID facility located in Northern Vir...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Le Bel, Paul David
Other Authors: Civil and Environmental Engineering
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/48656
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-48656
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-486562020-09-29T05:42:59Z Performance Evaluation of a Low Impact Development Retrofit for Urban Stormwater Treatment Le Bel, Paul David Civil and Environmental Engineering Grizzard, Thomas J. Godrej, Adil N. Sample, David J. Bioretention Low Impact Development Summation of Loads Method Effluent Probability Method Censored Datasets The goal of Low Impact Development (LID) is to mimic the pre-development hydrologic regime of a catchment through infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation, and detention of post-development runoff using small-scale hydrologic controls close to the source. A LID facility located in Northern Virginia was examined for pollutant removal and hydrologic performance. The treatment train included four in-line grass swales followed by a bioretention cell with a gravel base. The facility retained 85% of the rainfall. Influent and effluent pollutant loads were calculated using three common substitution methods for datasets censored by values below the analytical detection limit. The Summation of Loads (SOL) method was used to facilitate understanding of how data censoring affected performance results when substitution methods were used. The SOL analysis showed positive removal performance for most nutrient species, sediment, oxygen demanding substances, selected trace metals and total petroleum hydrocarbons. Negative performance was observed for oxidized nitrogen, total dissolved solids and oil & grease. LID facility influent and effluent loads were also compared using the Effluent Probability Method (EPM). The EPM analysis showed statistically significant (p d 0.05) pollutant load removal performance over the entire range of sampled events for total suspended solids, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand, copper, zinc and alkalinity. EPM analysis did not show significant removals of oxidized nitrogen, total dissolved solids, orthophosphate phosphorus and hardness. Master of Science 2014-06-10T14:03:31Z 2014-06-10T14:03:31Z 2013-04-18 Thesis vt_gsexam:683 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/48656 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ ETD application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Bioretention
Low Impact Development
Summation of Loads Method
Effluent Probability Method
Censored Datasets
spellingShingle Bioretention
Low Impact Development
Summation of Loads Method
Effluent Probability Method
Censored Datasets
Le Bel, Paul David
Performance Evaluation of a Low Impact Development Retrofit for Urban Stormwater Treatment
description The goal of Low Impact Development (LID) is to mimic the pre-development hydrologic regime of a catchment through infiltration, filtration, storage, evaporation, and detention of post-development runoff using small-scale hydrologic controls close to the source. A LID facility located in Northern Virginia was examined for pollutant removal and hydrologic performance. The treatment train included four in-line grass swales followed by a bioretention cell with a gravel base. The facility retained 85% of the rainfall. Influent and effluent pollutant loads were calculated using three common substitution methods for datasets censored by values below the analytical detection limit. The Summation of Loads (SOL) method was used to facilitate understanding of how data censoring affected performance results when substitution methods were used. The SOL analysis showed positive removal performance for most nutrient species, sediment, oxygen demanding substances, selected trace metals and total petroleum hydrocarbons. Negative performance was observed for oxidized nitrogen, total dissolved solids and oil & grease. LID facility influent and effluent loads were also compared using the Effluent Probability Method (EPM). The EPM analysis showed statistically significant (p d 0.05) pollutant load removal performance over the entire range of sampled events for total suspended solids, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, ammonia nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand, copper, zinc and alkalinity. EPM analysis did not show significant removals of oxidized nitrogen, total dissolved solids, orthophosphate phosphorus and hardness. === Master of Science
author2 Civil and Environmental Engineering
author_facet Civil and Environmental Engineering
Le Bel, Paul David
author Le Bel, Paul David
author_sort Le Bel, Paul David
title Performance Evaluation of a Low Impact Development Retrofit for Urban Stormwater Treatment
title_short Performance Evaluation of a Low Impact Development Retrofit for Urban Stormwater Treatment
title_full Performance Evaluation of a Low Impact Development Retrofit for Urban Stormwater Treatment
title_fullStr Performance Evaluation of a Low Impact Development Retrofit for Urban Stormwater Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Performance Evaluation of a Low Impact Development Retrofit for Urban Stormwater Treatment
title_sort performance evaluation of a low impact development retrofit for urban stormwater treatment
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/48656
work_keys_str_mv AT lebelpauldavid performanceevaluationofalowimpactdevelopmentretrofitforurbanstormwatertreatment
_version_ 1719345727611600896