Analysis of disinfection by products in drinking water by solid phase extraction

The objectives of this research were to develop a broad spectrum method for the extraction, concentration, and analysis of drinking water disinfection by products using solid phase extraction (SPE), and to determine if this method had lower detection limits and less variability than the proposed liq...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sexton, Diane Lynne
Other Authors: Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/44742
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-09122009-040321/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-44742
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-447422021-05-15T05:26:32Z Analysis of disinfection by products in drinking water by solid phase extraction Sexton, Diane Lynne Environmental Sciences and Engineering LD5655.V855 1992.S497 Disinfection and disinfectants -- By-products Drinking water -- Analysis Drinking water -- Contamination The objectives of this research were to develop a broad spectrum method for the extraction, concentration, and analysis of drinking water disinfection by products using solid phase extraction (SPE), and to determine if this method had lower detection limits and less variability than the proposed liquid-liquid extraction method, EPA Method 551. The disinfection by products investigated were halogenated nitriles, ketones, and aldehydes. The SPE method extracted and concentrated samples using the C-18 Empore Extraction Disks, and desorbed the analytes with methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) as a solvent. The results showed that with the SPE method the recoveries were low (0-50%) for most compounds, and the limit of detection (LOD) values were in the range of 0.2 to 50 ug/L, which were much higher than those for EPA Method 551. The variability was also higher than for EPA Method 551. The SPE method also appeared to be concentration dependent; the recoveries decreased as analyte concentration increased. Highly saline conditions (250 g/L NaCl) resulted in low recoveries and concentration dependencies for some compounds. Even though the SPE method was easier and faster, the lower method detection limit (MDL) values and lower variability made Method 551 more preferable. Further analysis of the SPE method using a new cyclohexyl disk was also recommended. Master of Science 2014-03-14T21:45:46Z 2014-03-14T21:45:46Z 1992 2009-09-12 2009-09-12 2009-09-12 Thesis Text etd-09122009-040321 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/44742 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-09122009-040321/ en OCLC# 26033486 LD5655.V855_1992.S497.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ vii, 82 leaves BTD application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LD5655.V855 1992.S497
Disinfection and disinfectants -- By-products
Drinking water -- Analysis
Drinking water -- Contamination
spellingShingle LD5655.V855 1992.S497
Disinfection and disinfectants -- By-products
Drinking water -- Analysis
Drinking water -- Contamination
Sexton, Diane Lynne
Analysis of disinfection by products in drinking water by solid phase extraction
description The objectives of this research were to develop a broad spectrum method for the extraction, concentration, and analysis of drinking water disinfection by products using solid phase extraction (SPE), and to determine if this method had lower detection limits and less variability than the proposed liquid-liquid extraction method, EPA Method 551. The disinfection by products investigated were halogenated nitriles, ketones, and aldehydes. The SPE method extracted and concentrated samples using the C-18 Empore Extraction Disks, and desorbed the analytes with methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE) as a solvent. The results showed that with the SPE method the recoveries were low (0-50%) for most compounds, and the limit of detection (LOD) values were in the range of 0.2 to 50 ug/L, which were much higher than those for EPA Method 551. The variability was also higher than for EPA Method 551. The SPE method also appeared to be concentration dependent; the recoveries decreased as analyte concentration increased. Highly saline conditions (250 g/L NaCl) resulted in low recoveries and concentration dependencies for some compounds. Even though the SPE method was easier and faster, the lower method detection limit (MDL) values and lower variability made Method 551 more preferable. Further analysis of the SPE method using a new cyclohexyl disk was also recommended. === Master of Science
author2 Environmental Sciences and Engineering
author_facet Environmental Sciences and Engineering
Sexton, Diane Lynne
author Sexton, Diane Lynne
author_sort Sexton, Diane Lynne
title Analysis of disinfection by products in drinking water by solid phase extraction
title_short Analysis of disinfection by products in drinking water by solid phase extraction
title_full Analysis of disinfection by products in drinking water by solid phase extraction
title_fullStr Analysis of disinfection by products in drinking water by solid phase extraction
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of disinfection by products in drinking water by solid phase extraction
title_sort analysis of disinfection by products in drinking water by solid phase extraction
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/44742
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-09122009-040321/
work_keys_str_mv AT sextondianelynne analysisofdisinfectionbyproductsindrinkingwaterbysolidphaseextraction
_version_ 1719404581035704320