Comparing LED Lighting Systems in the Detection and Color Recognition of Roadway Objects

This study compared two LED luminaires and their abilities to provide detection distance and color recognition distance of potential roadway hazard. Detection distance is regarded as a metric of visibility. Color recognition distance is a metric for comparing the impact of the (Correlated Color Temp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Terry, Travis
Other Authors: Industrial and Systems Engineering
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
LED
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/42871
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062011-093649/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-42871
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-428712020-09-29T05:45:11Z Comparing LED Lighting Systems in the Detection and Color Recognition of Roadway Objects Terry, Travis Industrial and Systems Engineering Smith-Jackson, Tonya L. Lockhart, Thurmon E. Gibbons, Ronald B. LED roadway safety night driving lighting color contrast luminance contrast small target visibility color recognition This study compared two LED luminaires and their abilities to provide detection distance and color recognition distance of potential roadway hazard. Detection distance is regarded as a metric of visibility. Color recognition distance is a metric for comparing the impact of the (Correlated Color Temperature) CCT of each luminaire and their color contrast impact. Mesopic vision, the mode of vision most commonly used for night driving, was considered in this study. Off-axis objects were presented to participants to assess the peripheral abilities of the luminaires. The impacts of luminance and color contrast were addressed in this study. The experiment was performed on the Virginia Smart Road where standard objects of different colors and pedestrians wearing different colors were detected by drivers of a moving vehicle in a controlled environment. The key difference between the two luminaires was their color temperatures (3500K versus 6000K). The results indicated that neither light source provided a significant benefit over the other although significant interactions were found among object color, age, and lighting level. The results indicate that the luminaires provide similar luminance contrast but their color contrasts depend heavily on the color temperature, the object, and the observer. This study followed the protocol developed by the Mesopic Optimisation of Visual Efficiency (MOVE) consortium developed by the CIE for modeling mesopic visual behavior. Master of Science 2014-03-14T21:36:58Z 2014-03-14T21:36:58Z 2011-05-11 2011-06-06 2011-07-25 2011-07-25 Thesis etd-06062011-093649 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/42871 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062011-093649/ IRB_Approval.pdf Terry_TN_T_2011(3).pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LED
roadway safety
night driving
lighting
color contrast
luminance contrast
small target visibility
color recognition
spellingShingle LED
roadway safety
night driving
lighting
color contrast
luminance contrast
small target visibility
color recognition
Terry, Travis
Comparing LED Lighting Systems in the Detection and Color Recognition of Roadway Objects
description This study compared two LED luminaires and their abilities to provide detection distance and color recognition distance of potential roadway hazard. Detection distance is regarded as a metric of visibility. Color recognition distance is a metric for comparing the impact of the (Correlated Color Temperature) CCT of each luminaire and their color contrast impact. Mesopic vision, the mode of vision most commonly used for night driving, was considered in this study. Off-axis objects were presented to participants to assess the peripheral abilities of the luminaires. The impacts of luminance and color contrast were addressed in this study. The experiment was performed on the Virginia Smart Road where standard objects of different colors and pedestrians wearing different colors were detected by drivers of a moving vehicle in a controlled environment. The key difference between the two luminaires was their color temperatures (3500K versus 6000K). The results indicated that neither light source provided a significant benefit over the other although significant interactions were found among object color, age, and lighting level. The results indicate that the luminaires provide similar luminance contrast but their color contrasts depend heavily on the color temperature, the object, and the observer. This study followed the protocol developed by the Mesopic Optimisation of Visual Efficiency (MOVE) consortium developed by the CIE for modeling mesopic visual behavior. === Master of Science
author2 Industrial and Systems Engineering
author_facet Industrial and Systems Engineering
Terry, Travis
author Terry, Travis
author_sort Terry, Travis
title Comparing LED Lighting Systems in the Detection and Color Recognition of Roadway Objects
title_short Comparing LED Lighting Systems in the Detection and Color Recognition of Roadway Objects
title_full Comparing LED Lighting Systems in the Detection and Color Recognition of Roadway Objects
title_fullStr Comparing LED Lighting Systems in the Detection and Color Recognition of Roadway Objects
title_full_unstemmed Comparing LED Lighting Systems in the Detection and Color Recognition of Roadway Objects
title_sort comparing led lighting systems in the detection and color recognition of roadway objects
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/42871
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062011-093649/
work_keys_str_mv AT terrytravis comparingledlightingsystemsinthedetectionandcolorrecognitionofroadwayobjects
_version_ 1719346127234400256