Aberrant self-promotion versus Machiavellianism: a discriminant validity study

<p>The purpose of the present study was to provide evidence of discriminant validity for the aberrant self-promotion construct proposed by Gustafson and Ritzer (1994a). The study attempted to differentiate the aberrant self-promotion construct from the Machiavellianism construct proposed by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Holloway, Anne E.
Other Authors: Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41404
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-03042009-040642/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-41404
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-414042021-05-26T05:48:21Z Aberrant self-promotion versus Machiavellianism: a discriminant validity study Holloway, Anne E. Industrial/Organizational Psychology Gustafson, Sigrid B. Axsom, Danny K. Foti, Roseanne J. LD5655.V855 1994.H6556 Egoism Machiavellianism (Psychology) Self-interest <p>The purpose of the present study was to provide evidence of discriminant validity for the aberrant self-promotion construct proposed by Gustafson and Ritzer (1994a). The study attempted to differentiate the aberrant self-promotion construct from the Machiavellianism construct proposed by Christie (1970a). The aberrant self-promoter (ASP) has been conceptualized as exhibiting high self-esteem, low social desirability, and a high degree of antisocial behavior. In contrast, the Machiavellian has been conceptualized as an individual who is coldly rational in determining his or her actions and who is adept at engaging in manipulation to achieve a desired end. It was proposed in the present study that although both the ASP and the Machiavellian may be characterized by high narcissism, high self-esteem, and low social desirability, the Machiavellian does not exhibit the antisocial behavior that is a key component of the ASP pattern. The proposed differentiation, based on 28 undergraduate ASPs and 19 undergraduate Machiavellians, involved a structured interview and a prisoner's dilemma game. The results from the interview showed that the ASPs scored significantly higher on the total score, as well as on the subscore for a narcissism-related factor and on the subscore for an antisocial behavior factor. The prisoner's dilemma results, however, revealed no significant differences between the ASPs and Machs. Discussion focused on the insufficient salience of the prisoner's dilemma experimental situation and on the research and organizational implications of the ASP/Machiavellian differentiation supported by the interview. Master of Science 2014-03-14T21:30:52Z 2014-03-14T21:30:52Z 1994-05-05 2009-03-04 2009-03-04 2009-03-04 Thesis Text etd-03042009-040642 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41404 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-03042009-040642/ en OCLC# 32456196 LD5655.V855_1994.H6556.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ vii, 90 leaves BTD application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LD5655.V855 1994.H6556
Egoism
Machiavellianism (Psychology)
Self-interest
spellingShingle LD5655.V855 1994.H6556
Egoism
Machiavellianism (Psychology)
Self-interest
Holloway, Anne E.
Aberrant self-promotion versus Machiavellianism: a discriminant validity study
description <p>The purpose of the present study was to provide evidence of discriminant validity for the aberrant self-promotion construct proposed by Gustafson and Ritzer (1994a). The study attempted to differentiate the aberrant self-promotion construct from the Machiavellianism construct proposed by Christie (1970a). The aberrant self-promoter (ASP) has been conceptualized as exhibiting high self-esteem, low social desirability, and a high degree of antisocial behavior. In contrast, the Machiavellian has been conceptualized as an individual who is coldly rational in determining his or her actions and who is adept at engaging in manipulation to achieve a desired end. It was proposed in the present study that although both the ASP and the Machiavellian may be characterized by high narcissism, high self-esteem, and low social desirability, the Machiavellian does not exhibit the antisocial behavior that is a key component of the ASP pattern. The proposed differentiation, based on 28 undergraduate ASPs and 19 undergraduate Machiavellians, involved a structured interview and a prisoner's dilemma game. The results from the interview showed that the ASPs scored significantly higher on the total score, as well as on the subscore for a narcissism-related factor and on the subscore for an antisocial behavior factor. The prisoner's dilemma results, however, revealed no significant differences between the ASPs and Machs. Discussion focused on the insufficient salience of the prisoner's dilemma experimental situation and on the research and organizational implications of the ASP/Machiavellian differentiation supported by the interview. === Master of Science
author2 Industrial/Organizational Psychology
author_facet Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Holloway, Anne E.
author Holloway, Anne E.
author_sort Holloway, Anne E.
title Aberrant self-promotion versus Machiavellianism: a discriminant validity study
title_short Aberrant self-promotion versus Machiavellianism: a discriminant validity study
title_full Aberrant self-promotion versus Machiavellianism: a discriminant validity study
title_fullStr Aberrant self-promotion versus Machiavellianism: a discriminant validity study
title_full_unstemmed Aberrant self-promotion versus Machiavellianism: a discriminant validity study
title_sort aberrant self-promotion versus machiavellianism: a discriminant validity study
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41404
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-03042009-040642/
work_keys_str_mv AT hollowayannee aberrantselfpromotionversusmachiavellianismadiscriminantvaliditystudy
_version_ 1719406702902640640