Push-pull Tests to Quantify In-situ Naphthalene Phytoremediation Rates

Ten strategically placed push-pull wells were installed to determine in-situ degradation rates at a creosote contaminated site and to assess the contribution of hybrid poplar trees to polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) remediation. Well positioning enabled comparison between contaminated and no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pitterle, Mark Thomas
Other Authors: Environmental Engineering
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41282
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02242004-014652/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-41282
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-412822020-09-29T05:39:22Z Push-pull Tests to Quantify In-situ Naphthalene Phytoremediation Rates Pitterle, Mark Thomas Environmental Engineering Hagedorn, Charles III Widdowson, Mark A. Novak, John T. phytoremediation naphthalene creosote push pull injection withdrawal poplar trees Ten strategically placed push-pull wells were installed to determine in-situ degradation rates at a creosote contaminated site and to assess the contribution of hybrid poplar trees to polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) remediation. Well positioning enabled comparison between contaminated and non-contaminated locations, as well as comparisons between locations with and without trees. Comparison of areas with and without trees enabled an improved understanding of the role that the phytoremediation system has on the overall degradation of PAHs at the site. Bromide, a conservative, non-reactive tracer, was injected in solution along with dissolved oxygen. Twelve push-pull tests (PPTs) were performed, of which three did not include naphthalene in the injection solution, so that the developed method could be evaluated, tested, and yield an initial set of rates to make seasonal and spatial varying in-situ comparisons. Method comparison used for rate analysis found the highest confidence in the method of Snodgrass and Kitanidis (1998) for zero order rates and the method of Haggerty et al. (1998) for first order rates. The largest zero and first order rates, 2.43 mgnaphthalene/L-hr and 1.25 1/hr, respectively, occurred at treed regions in June. Zero and first order winter rates at treed regions were greater by a factor of at least 2.5 when compared to non-treed regions. Degradation rates at treed regions were found to steadily increase by over four times from winter to summer. Results validate that decay variations attributed to phytoremediation can be detected with the push-pull method. PPTs performed at the Oneida site verified observed trends determined from six years of monitoring data, microbial characterization, and microcosm studies. Master of Science 2014-03-14T21:30:20Z 2014-03-14T21:30:20Z 2004-01-09 2004-02-24 2005-03-04 2004-03-04 Thesis etd-02242004-014652 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41282 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02242004-014652/ Thesis_&_Appendices.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic phytoremediation
naphthalene
creosote
push pull
injection withdrawal
poplar trees
spellingShingle phytoremediation
naphthalene
creosote
push pull
injection withdrawal
poplar trees
Pitterle, Mark Thomas
Push-pull Tests to Quantify In-situ Naphthalene Phytoremediation Rates
description Ten strategically placed push-pull wells were installed to determine in-situ degradation rates at a creosote contaminated site and to assess the contribution of hybrid poplar trees to polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) remediation. Well positioning enabled comparison between contaminated and non-contaminated locations, as well as comparisons between locations with and without trees. Comparison of areas with and without trees enabled an improved understanding of the role that the phytoremediation system has on the overall degradation of PAHs at the site. Bromide, a conservative, non-reactive tracer, was injected in solution along with dissolved oxygen. Twelve push-pull tests (PPTs) were performed, of which three did not include naphthalene in the injection solution, so that the developed method could be evaluated, tested, and yield an initial set of rates to make seasonal and spatial varying in-situ comparisons. Method comparison used for rate analysis found the highest confidence in the method of Snodgrass and Kitanidis (1998) for zero order rates and the method of Haggerty et al. (1998) for first order rates. The largest zero and first order rates, 2.43 mgnaphthalene/L-hr and 1.25 1/hr, respectively, occurred at treed regions in June. Zero and first order winter rates at treed regions were greater by a factor of at least 2.5 when compared to non-treed regions. Degradation rates at treed regions were found to steadily increase by over four times from winter to summer. Results validate that decay variations attributed to phytoremediation can be detected with the push-pull method. PPTs performed at the Oneida site verified observed trends determined from six years of monitoring data, microbial characterization, and microcosm studies. === Master of Science
author2 Environmental Engineering
author_facet Environmental Engineering
Pitterle, Mark Thomas
author Pitterle, Mark Thomas
author_sort Pitterle, Mark Thomas
title Push-pull Tests to Quantify In-situ Naphthalene Phytoremediation Rates
title_short Push-pull Tests to Quantify In-situ Naphthalene Phytoremediation Rates
title_full Push-pull Tests to Quantify In-situ Naphthalene Phytoremediation Rates
title_fullStr Push-pull Tests to Quantify In-situ Naphthalene Phytoremediation Rates
title_full_unstemmed Push-pull Tests to Quantify In-situ Naphthalene Phytoremediation Rates
title_sort push-pull tests to quantify in-situ naphthalene phytoremediation rates
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/41282
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02242004-014652/
work_keys_str_mv AT pitterlemarkthomas pushpullteststoquantifyinsitunaphthalenephytoremediationrates
_version_ 1719344863798886400