U.S. policy of conditioning China's most-favored-nation status on intellectual property protection, 1991-1993

This study focuses on the U.S. policy of conditioning China's Most-FavoredNation (MFN) status on its intellectual property protection in the 1991-1993 period. It seeks to evaluate the importance of U.S. foreign policy interests, societal actors, institutions (the presidency or Congress), and th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zeng, Ka
Other Authors: Political Science
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/40584
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-01102009-063924/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-40584
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-405842021-11-06T05:34:14Z U.S. policy of conditioning China's most-favored-nation status on intellectual property protection, 1991-1993 Zeng, Ka Political Science LD5655.V855 1995.Z424 This study focuses on the U.S. policy of conditioning China's Most-FavoredNation (MFN) status on its intellectual property protection in the 1991-1993 period. It seeks to evaluate the importance of U.S. foreign policy interests, societal actors, institutions (the presidency or Congress), and the interaction between these institutions in the MFN decisionmaking process. By applying three conceptual models -- the rational actor model, the interest group model, and the interbranch politics model -- to the three distinct phases in the development of the MFN-IPR policy, this study finds that it is most useful to combine the international explanation with one stressing domestic rules and institutions. Although U.S. strategic interests define the boundary of China policy and provide a justification of why the United States would continue to grant MFN status to China, MFN policy formulation has also been a function of U.S. domestic political process. With the diversification of China policy objectives and the pluralization of the policymaking process, U.S. strategic interests are frequently weighted and balanced by concerned governmental and societal institutions in the process, and are eventually reconciled with various political preferences to shape foreign policy outcomes. By breaking down the concept of a unitary state actor in the foreign policymaking process and unpacking the "black box" of domestic politics, the interest group model and the interbranch politics model allow us to see how domestic actors and institutions could serve to modify U.S. response to systemic conditions. They are useful supplements to the rational actor model in explaining the U.S. policy of conditional MFN. Master of Arts 2014-03-14T21:26:55Z 2014-03-14T21:26:55Z 1995 2009-01-10 2009-01-10 2009-01-10 Thesis Text etd-01102009-063924 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/40584 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-01102009-063924/ en OCLC# 34240275 LD5655.V855_1995.Z424.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ iv, 140 leaves BTD application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LD5655.V855 1995.Z424
spellingShingle LD5655.V855 1995.Z424
Zeng, Ka
U.S. policy of conditioning China's most-favored-nation status on intellectual property protection, 1991-1993
description This study focuses on the U.S. policy of conditioning China's Most-FavoredNation (MFN) status on its intellectual property protection in the 1991-1993 period. It seeks to evaluate the importance of U.S. foreign policy interests, societal actors, institutions (the presidency or Congress), and the interaction between these institutions in the MFN decisionmaking process. By applying three conceptual models -- the rational actor model, the interest group model, and the interbranch politics model -- to the three distinct phases in the development of the MFN-IPR policy, this study finds that it is most useful to combine the international explanation with one stressing domestic rules and institutions. Although U.S. strategic interests define the boundary of China policy and provide a justification of why the United States would continue to grant MFN status to China, MFN policy formulation has also been a function of U.S. domestic political process. With the diversification of China policy objectives and the pluralization of the policymaking process, U.S. strategic interests are frequently weighted and balanced by concerned governmental and societal institutions in the process, and are eventually reconciled with various political preferences to shape foreign policy outcomes. By breaking down the concept of a unitary state actor in the foreign policymaking process and unpacking the "black box" of domestic politics, the interest group model and the interbranch politics model allow us to see how domestic actors and institutions could serve to modify U.S. response to systemic conditions. They are useful supplements to the rational actor model in explaining the U.S. policy of conditional MFN. === Master of Arts
author2 Political Science
author_facet Political Science
Zeng, Ka
author Zeng, Ka
author_sort Zeng, Ka
title U.S. policy of conditioning China's most-favored-nation status on intellectual property protection, 1991-1993
title_short U.S. policy of conditioning China's most-favored-nation status on intellectual property protection, 1991-1993
title_full U.S. policy of conditioning China's most-favored-nation status on intellectual property protection, 1991-1993
title_fullStr U.S. policy of conditioning China's most-favored-nation status on intellectual property protection, 1991-1993
title_full_unstemmed U.S. policy of conditioning China's most-favored-nation status on intellectual property protection, 1991-1993
title_sort u.s. policy of conditioning china's most-favored-nation status on intellectual property protection, 1991-1993
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/40584
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-01102009-063924/
work_keys_str_mv AT zengka uspolicyofconditioningchinasmostfavorednationstatusonintellectualpropertyprotection19911993
_version_ 1719492900247568384