The Effect of Age on Dark Focus Distance and Visual Information Transfer Rate

Although the static measure of accommodation is well documented, the dynamic aspect of the resting state (dark focus) of accommodation is still unknown. Previous studies suggest that refractive error is minimal at the intermediate resting point of accommodation â i.e., at the dark focus distances...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yodpijit, Nantakrit
Other Authors: Industrial and Systems Engineering
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Age
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/40341
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11152010-135955/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-40341
record_format oai_dc
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Autorefractor
Dark Focus
Visual Information Transfer Rate
Age
spellingShingle Autorefractor
Dark Focus
Visual Information Transfer Rate
Age
Yodpijit, Nantakrit
The Effect of Age on Dark Focus Distance and Visual Information Transfer Rate
description Although the static measure of accommodation is well documented, the dynamic aspect of the resting state (dark focus) of accommodation is still unknown. Previous studies suggest that refractive error is minimal at the intermediate resting point of accommodation â i.e., at the dark focus distances. Additionally, aging is closely linked to increased refractive error. In order to assess the effects of age on dark focus distance and its utility in enhancing the visual information transfer rate, two experiments were conducted under nighttime condition (scotopic vision) in a laboratory setting. A total of forty participants with normal vision or corrected to normal vision were recruited from four different age groups (younger: 26.9±5.0 years; middle-aged: 50.7±4.8 years; young-old: 64.6±2.8 years; and old-old: 79.8±6.1 years). Each age group included ten participants. In Experiment I, the accommodative status of dark focus at the fovea was assessed objectively using the modified autorefractor, a newly developed method to continuously monitor the accommodation process. The mean dark focus distances for younger, middle-aged, young-old, and old-old adults were 64.5±6.6, 73.4±20.6, 84.4±29, and 92.1±33.4 cm, respectively. There was a significant difference between the dark focus distances among different age groups. Post-hoc analysis indicated that there were statistically significant differences among young and old-old, young and young-old, and middle-aged and old-old age groups. In Experiment II, the information transfer rate was determined while viewing a target at three different distances: 52 cm, 73 cm (current recommended reading distances) and the individualâ s dark focus. A set of randomized alphabet characters were presented on a visual display with a luminance level of 20 cd/m2 and ambient illumination level of 4 lux. To assess the information transfer rate, participants were asked to read a set of characters aloud with their fastest rate for three seconds. Three measurements of inforamtion transfer rate at each viewing distance at random were made. Results obtained from each viewing distance were collected and averaged. The results showed that the mean visual information transfer rate for younger, middle-aged, young-old, and old-old adults were 14.27±1.43, 10.58±2.25, 9.35±2.13, and 7.73±2.36 bits/sec, respectively. There were statistically significant differences at α < 0.05 in means and standard deviations of visual information transfer rate in young and old-old, young and young-old, young and middle-aged, and middle-aged and old-old age groups. The mean visual information transfer rate at 52 cm, 73 cm and individual dark focus were 11.08±3.10, 10.14±2.97, and 10.22±3.42 bits/sec, respectively. There were statistically significant differences at α < 0.05 in means and standard deviations of visual information transfer rate at different viewing distances at 52 cm and 73 cm, and 52 cm and individualâ s dark focus. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the interaction between age and viewing distance (F = 1.6818, P = 0.1378) on the amount of visual information transfer rate. In summary, the visual information transfer rate was not greater when presenting visual stimulus at the individualâ s dark focus as compared with two fixed recommended viewing distances (52 cm and 73 cm). The greatest amount of visual information gained was at 52 cm. Actual and potential applications of this study including specifications for designs were also discussed. === Ph. D.
author2 Industrial and Systems Engineering
author_facet Industrial and Systems Engineering
Yodpijit, Nantakrit
author Yodpijit, Nantakrit
author_sort Yodpijit, Nantakrit
title The Effect of Age on Dark Focus Distance and Visual Information Transfer Rate
title_short The Effect of Age on Dark Focus Distance and Visual Information Transfer Rate
title_full The Effect of Age on Dark Focus Distance and Visual Information Transfer Rate
title_fullStr The Effect of Age on Dark Focus Distance and Visual Information Transfer Rate
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Age on Dark Focus Distance and Visual Information Transfer Rate
title_sort effect of age on dark focus distance and visual information transfer rate
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/40341
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11152010-135955/
work_keys_str_mv AT yodpijitnantakrit theeffectofageondarkfocusdistanceandvisualinformationtransferrate
AT yodpijitnantakrit effectofageondarkfocusdistanceandvisualinformationtransferrate
_version_ 1719341052840640512
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-403412020-09-26T05:31:39Z The Effect of Age on Dark Focus Distance and Visual Information Transfer Rate Yodpijit, Nantakrit Industrial and Systems Engineering Lockhart, Thurmon E. Kleiner, Brian M. Roberto, Karen A. Winchester, Woodrow W. III Autorefractor Dark Focus Visual Information Transfer Rate Age Although the static measure of accommodation is well documented, the dynamic aspect of the resting state (dark focus) of accommodation is still unknown. Previous studies suggest that refractive error is minimal at the intermediate resting point of accommodation â i.e., at the dark focus distances. Additionally, aging is closely linked to increased refractive error. In order to assess the effects of age on dark focus distance and its utility in enhancing the visual information transfer rate, two experiments were conducted under nighttime condition (scotopic vision) in a laboratory setting. A total of forty participants with normal vision or corrected to normal vision were recruited from four different age groups (younger: 26.9±5.0 years; middle-aged: 50.7±4.8 years; young-old: 64.6±2.8 years; and old-old: 79.8±6.1 years). Each age group included ten participants. In Experiment I, the accommodative status of dark focus at the fovea was assessed objectively using the modified autorefractor, a newly developed method to continuously monitor the accommodation process. The mean dark focus distances for younger, middle-aged, young-old, and old-old adults were 64.5±6.6, 73.4±20.6, 84.4±29, and 92.1±33.4 cm, respectively. There was a significant difference between the dark focus distances among different age groups. Post-hoc analysis indicated that there were statistically significant differences among young and old-old, young and young-old, and middle-aged and old-old age groups. In Experiment II, the information transfer rate was determined while viewing a target at three different distances: 52 cm, 73 cm (current recommended reading distances) and the individualâ s dark focus. A set of randomized alphabet characters were presented on a visual display with a luminance level of 20 cd/m2 and ambient illumination level of 4 lux. To assess the information transfer rate, participants were asked to read a set of characters aloud with their fastest rate for three seconds. Three measurements of inforamtion transfer rate at each viewing distance at random were made. Results obtained from each viewing distance were collected and averaged. The results showed that the mean visual information transfer rate for younger, middle-aged, young-old, and old-old adults were 14.27±1.43, 10.58±2.25, 9.35±2.13, and 7.73±2.36 bits/sec, respectively. There were statistically significant differences at α < 0.05 in means and standard deviations of visual information transfer rate in young and old-old, young and young-old, young and middle-aged, and middle-aged and old-old age groups. The mean visual information transfer rate at 52 cm, 73 cm and individual dark focus were 11.08±3.10, 10.14±2.97, and 10.22±3.42 bits/sec, respectively. There were statistically significant differences at α < 0.05 in means and standard deviations of visual information transfer rate at different viewing distances at 52 cm and 73 cm, and 52 cm and individualâ s dark focus. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the interaction between age and viewing distance (F = 1.6818, P = 0.1378) on the amount of visual information transfer rate. In summary, the visual information transfer rate was not greater when presenting visual stimulus at the individualâ s dark focus as compared with two fixed recommended viewing distances (52 cm and 73 cm). The greatest amount of visual information gained was at 52 cm. Actual and potential applications of this study including specifications for designs were also discussed. Ph. D. 2014-03-14T21:23:09Z 2014-03-14T21:23:09Z 2010-10-14 2010-11-15 2010-12-08 2010-12-08 Dissertation etd-11152010-135955 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/40341 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11152010-135955/ Yodpijit_N_D_2010_IRB_Informed_Consent_Form.pdf Yodpijit_N_D_2010.pdf Yodpijit_N_D_2010_IRB_Approval_Letter.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech