Industry characteristics, agency theory, and the interaction of capital structure and dividend policy
The literature on agency theory has generally modelled and tested the firm’s dividend and capital structure decisions separately. In this dissertation, a model is developed based on agency cost considerations and dividends as a means of controlling equity agency costs, which simultaneously determine...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
Virginia Tech
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/39752 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-10122005-134410/ |
id |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-39752 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-397522021-11-19T05:37:33Z Industry characteristics, agency theory, and the interaction of capital structure and dividend policy Noronha, Gregory Mario Finance LD5655.V856 1990.N676 Corporations -- Finance -- Decision making Dividends The literature on agency theory has generally modelled and tested the firm’s dividend and capital structure decisions separately. In this dissertation, a model is developed based on agency cost considerations and dividends as a means of controlling equity agency costs, which simultaneously determines the optimal capital structure and payout rate for firms. However, to the extent that alternative, non-dividend mechanisms exist across industries and industry groups that may either diminish or nullify the effect of dividends in controlling equity agency costs, simultaneity is not predicted to be universal but a function of industry characteristics. This central hypothesis is tested on three industry groups: industrial firms, banks and electric utilities. Banks and utilities are regulated. Industrials are not regulated but are subject to other equity agency cost controlling mechanisms like the threat of takeover and incentive-based compensation packages. As hypothesized, the results for industrials show no simultaneity in the subsample where these other mechanisms are present, and simultaneity in the subsample where dividends are the dominant mechanism. For banks and utilities no simultaneity is found since regulation, through its effect on the debt agency cost curve of firms in these industries effectively precludes its occurrence. Ph. D. 2014-03-14T21:20:49Z 2014-03-14T21:20:49Z 1990 2005-10-12 2005-10-12 2005-10-12 Dissertation Text etd-10122005-134410 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/39752 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-10122005-134410/ en OCLC# 23202505 LD5655.V856_1990.N676.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ viii, 121 leaves BTD application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
LD5655.V856 1990.N676 Corporations -- Finance -- Decision making Dividends |
spellingShingle |
LD5655.V856 1990.N676 Corporations -- Finance -- Decision making Dividends Noronha, Gregory Mario Industry characteristics, agency theory, and the interaction of capital structure and dividend policy |
description |
The literature on agency theory has generally modelled and tested the firm’s dividend and capital structure decisions separately. In this dissertation, a model is developed based on agency cost considerations and dividends as a means of controlling equity agency costs, which simultaneously determines the optimal capital structure and payout rate for firms. However, to the extent that alternative, non-dividend mechanisms exist across industries and industry groups that may either diminish or nullify the effect of dividends in controlling equity agency costs, simultaneity is not predicted to be universal but a function of industry characteristics. This central hypothesis is tested on three industry groups: industrial firms, banks and electric utilities. Banks and utilities are regulated. Industrials are not regulated but are subject to other equity agency cost controlling mechanisms like the threat of takeover and incentive-based compensation packages. As hypothesized, the results for industrials show no simultaneity in the subsample where these other mechanisms are present, and simultaneity in the subsample where dividends are the dominant mechanism. For banks and utilities no simultaneity is found since regulation, through its effect on the debt agency cost curve of firms in these industries effectively precludes its occurrence. === Ph. D. |
author2 |
Finance |
author_facet |
Finance Noronha, Gregory Mario |
author |
Noronha, Gregory Mario |
author_sort |
Noronha, Gregory Mario |
title |
Industry characteristics, agency theory, and the interaction of capital structure and dividend policy |
title_short |
Industry characteristics, agency theory, and the interaction of capital structure and dividend policy |
title_full |
Industry characteristics, agency theory, and the interaction of capital structure and dividend policy |
title_fullStr |
Industry characteristics, agency theory, and the interaction of capital structure and dividend policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Industry characteristics, agency theory, and the interaction of capital structure and dividend policy |
title_sort |
industry characteristics, agency theory, and the interaction of capital structure and dividend policy |
publisher |
Virginia Tech |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/39752 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-10122005-134410/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT noronhagregorymario industrycharacteristicsagencytheoryandtheinteractionofcapitalstructureanddividendpolicy |
_version_ |
1719494416228417536 |