"We Shall Have to Make the Best of It:" The Conversion of Dennis Sciama

The cosmologist Dennis W. Sciama (1926-1999) was a long-standing advocate of the steady state model of the universe. This theory, originally proposed in 1948 by Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Fred Hoyle, suggested that the universe was eternal, and unchanging on the largest scales. Contrary to the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hunt, James Christopher
Other Authors: Science and Technology Studies
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/39458
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-09222005-221824/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-39458
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-394582020-09-26T05:33:04Z "We Shall Have to Make the Best of It:" The Conversion of Dennis Sciama Hunt, James Christopher Science and Technology Studies Pitt, Joseph C. Burian, Richard M. Hirsh, Richard F. Weiss, Steven C. Reeves, Barbara J. anomalies steady state Planck's Principle aesthetics of science theory choice cosmology The cosmologist Dennis W. Sciama (1926-1999) was a long-standing advocate of the steady state model of the universe. This theory, originally proposed in 1948 by Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Fred Hoyle, suggested that the universe was eternal, and unchanging on the largest scales. Contrary to the popular image of a scientist as a dispassionate, unbiased investigator of nature, Sciama fervently hoped the steady state model to be correct. In addition, and also pace the stereotypical image of a scientist, Sciama was motivated significantly by "extrascientific" or aesthetic factors in his adoption of the model. Finally, Sciama, in a stark contrast to the naive falsificationism usually presented as a virtue of the "scientific method," went through a several-year period of attempting to "save" the model from hostile data. However, Sciama abandoned the model in 1966 due to increasingly reliable data relating to the distribution of quasars. Thus the Sciama case also stands as a counterexample to irrationalist criticisms of science, according to which scientists can and will always find ways to hold on to their "pet" theories until they die, regardless of contradictory data. Sciama's conversion also sheds light on the iterative process that goes on as scientists localize and attempt to repair faults in their theories. Ph. D. 2014-03-14T21:19:14Z 2014-03-14T21:19:14Z 2005-09-09 2005-09-22 2008-10-14 2005-10-14 Dissertation etd-09222005-221824 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/39458 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-09222005-221824/ HuntDissertation.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic anomalies
steady state
Planck's Principle
aesthetics of science
theory choice
cosmology
spellingShingle anomalies
steady state
Planck's Principle
aesthetics of science
theory choice
cosmology
Hunt, James Christopher
"We Shall Have to Make the Best of It:" The Conversion of Dennis Sciama
description The cosmologist Dennis W. Sciama (1926-1999) was a long-standing advocate of the steady state model of the universe. This theory, originally proposed in 1948 by Hermann Bondi, Thomas Gold, and Fred Hoyle, suggested that the universe was eternal, and unchanging on the largest scales. Contrary to the popular image of a scientist as a dispassionate, unbiased investigator of nature, Sciama fervently hoped the steady state model to be correct. In addition, and also pace the stereotypical image of a scientist, Sciama was motivated significantly by "extrascientific" or aesthetic factors in his adoption of the model. Finally, Sciama, in a stark contrast to the naive falsificationism usually presented as a virtue of the "scientific method," went through a several-year period of attempting to "save" the model from hostile data. However, Sciama abandoned the model in 1966 due to increasingly reliable data relating to the distribution of quasars. Thus the Sciama case also stands as a counterexample to irrationalist criticisms of science, according to which scientists can and will always find ways to hold on to their "pet" theories until they die, regardless of contradictory data. Sciama's conversion also sheds light on the iterative process that goes on as scientists localize and attempt to repair faults in their theories. === Ph. D.
author2 Science and Technology Studies
author_facet Science and Technology Studies
Hunt, James Christopher
author Hunt, James Christopher
author_sort Hunt, James Christopher
title "We Shall Have to Make the Best of It:" The Conversion of Dennis Sciama
title_short "We Shall Have to Make the Best of It:" The Conversion of Dennis Sciama
title_full "We Shall Have to Make the Best of It:" The Conversion of Dennis Sciama
title_fullStr "We Shall Have to Make the Best of It:" The Conversion of Dennis Sciama
title_full_unstemmed "We Shall Have to Make the Best of It:" The Conversion of Dennis Sciama
title_sort "we shall have to make the best of it:" the conversion of dennis sciama
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/39458
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-09222005-221824/
work_keys_str_mv AT huntjameschristopher weshallhavetomakethebestofittheconversionofdennissciama
_version_ 1719341367402954752