An analysis of achievement tests for selected Virginia high school business computer applications students
The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of three achievement tests, with emphasis given to instructional validity. The tests were used to assess the performance of Business Computer Applications (BCA) students on their achievement of knowledge of computer application so...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
Virginia Tech
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/38419 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062008-170601/ |
id |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-38419 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-384192021-12-15T05:57:34Z An analysis of achievement tests for selected Virginia high school business computer applications students Williams, Arthur S. Vocational and Technical Education LD5655.V856 1994.W555 Business education -- Virginia Business -- Data processing -- Study and teaching (Secondary) -- Virginia Competency-based educational tests Examinations -- Validity -- Virginia The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of three achievement tests, with emphasis given to instructional validity. The tests were used to assess the performance of Business Computer Applications (BCA) students on their achievement of knowledge of computer application software concepts and vocabulary for word processing, spreadsheet, and database. Five concepts and vocabulary categories addressed included: vocabulary, access software, data/text entry, editing, and formatting. Data were also collected from BCA teachers of the students. Teachers were asked to rate each item for the three software types of the achievement test as to whether the concepts and vocabulary corresponding to that item had been taught. A selected sample was used in the study. Classes were divided into three approximately even student groups. Each group completed one of the tests for each software type. Percentage of items correct for the three software types were 53%-word processing, 46%- spreadsheet, and 36%-database. The Kuder-Richardson 20 (KR-20) estimates for the software types were .92--word processing, .92--spreadsheet, and .76--database. Due to a wide dispersion of KR-20 values for items within the 5 concepts and vocabulary categories by software, the items are useful only for group measures. Most of the 8 teachers did not teach a substantial part of the concepts and vocabulary included in the validated test items. This outcome indicates the curriculum related to the items needs to be examined and revised so that teachers can emphasize the most important concepts and vocabulary with their students. Analyses outcomes indicated that 59 of 60 word processing items, 51 of the 59 spreadsheet items, and 45 of the 59 database items were instructionally valid. Teachers selecting items for purposes of examining the achievement of their students related to software concepts and vocabulary cam effectively use items determined to be instructionally valid in this study. Ph. D. 2014-03-14T21:14:19Z 2014-03-14T21:14:19Z 1994 2008-06-06 2008-06-06 2008-06-06 Dissertation Text etd-06062008-170601 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/38419 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062008-170601/ en OCLC# 32943786 LD5655.V856_1994.W555.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ ix, 208 leaves BTD application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
LD5655.V856 1994.W555 Business education -- Virginia Business -- Data processing -- Study and teaching (Secondary) -- Virginia Competency-based educational tests Examinations -- Validity -- Virginia |
spellingShingle |
LD5655.V856 1994.W555 Business education -- Virginia Business -- Data processing -- Study and teaching (Secondary) -- Virginia Competency-based educational tests Examinations -- Validity -- Virginia Williams, Arthur S. An analysis of achievement tests for selected Virginia high school business computer applications students |
description |
The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of three achievement tests, with emphasis given to instructional validity. The tests were used to assess the performance of Business Computer Applications (BCA) students on their achievement of knowledge of computer application software concepts and vocabulary for word processing, spreadsheet, and database.
Five concepts and vocabulary categories addressed included: vocabulary, access software, data/text entry, editing, and formatting. Data were also collected from BCA teachers of the students. Teachers were asked to rate each item for the three software types of the achievement test as to whether the concepts and vocabulary corresponding to that item had been taught.
A selected sample was used in the study. Classes were divided into three approximately even student groups. Each group completed one of the tests for each software type. Percentage of items correct for the three software types were 53%-word processing, 46%- spreadsheet, and 36%-database. The Kuder-Richardson 20 (KR-20) estimates for the software types were .92--word processing, .92--spreadsheet, and .76--database. Due to a wide dispersion of KR-20 values for items within the 5 concepts and vocabulary categories by software, the items are useful only for group measures.
Most of the 8 teachers did not teach a substantial part of the concepts and vocabulary included in the validated test items. This outcome indicates the curriculum related to the items needs to be examined and revised so that teachers can emphasize the most important concepts and vocabulary with their students.
Analyses outcomes indicated that 59 of 60 word processing items, 51 of the 59 spreadsheet items, and 45 of the 59 database items were instructionally valid. Teachers selecting items for purposes of examining the achievement of their students related to software concepts and vocabulary cam effectively use items determined to be instructionally valid in this study. === Ph. D. |
author2 |
Vocational and Technical Education |
author_facet |
Vocational and Technical Education Williams, Arthur S. |
author |
Williams, Arthur S. |
author_sort |
Williams, Arthur S. |
title |
An analysis of achievement tests for selected Virginia high school business computer applications students |
title_short |
An analysis of achievement tests for selected Virginia high school business computer applications students |
title_full |
An analysis of achievement tests for selected Virginia high school business computer applications students |
title_fullStr |
An analysis of achievement tests for selected Virginia high school business computer applications students |
title_full_unstemmed |
An analysis of achievement tests for selected Virginia high school business computer applications students |
title_sort |
analysis of achievement tests for selected virginia high school business computer applications students |
publisher |
Virginia Tech |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/38419 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062008-170601/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT williamsarthurs ananalysisofachievementtestsforselectedvirginiahighschoolbusinesscomputerapplicationsstudents AT williamsarthurs analysisofachievementtestsforselectedvirginiahighschoolbusinesscomputerapplicationsstudents |
_version_ |
1723964640478625792 |