Pre- and post-retirement asset allocation: a simulation of retirement investment strategies for agricultural producers

This research simulates pre-retirement investment scenarios for agricultural producers. Thirty-two investment scenarios are examined, with each scenario differing with respect to retirement vehicle, investment strategy of the producer, and the use of a cash margin for reinvestment in the operation v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: White, Alexander B.
Other Authors: Agricultural and Applied Economics
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/38097
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062008-155229/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-38097
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-380972021-04-27T05:32:40Z Pre- and post-retirement asset allocation: a simulation of retirement investment strategies for agricultural producers White, Alexander B. Agricultural and Applied Economics Bosch, Darrell J. McGilliard, Michael L. Sherrick, Bruce J. McGuirk, Anya M. Kohl, David M. vector-autoregression LD5655.V856 1995.W458 This research simulates pre-retirement investment scenarios for agricultural producers. Thirty-two investment scenarios are examined, with each scenario differing with respect to retirement vehicle, investment strategy of the producer, and the use of a cash margin for reinvestment in the operation versus prepaying term debt (cash preference). The retirement vehicles included in this study are Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), Simplified Employee Pension Plans (SEPs), and 401(k) plans. Investment strategies reflect the producer's preference for investing in conservative, balanced, or aggressive assets, or a combination of these assets. Further, these scenarios are examined for three methods of capitalization: Case I- an operation with a 50 percent debt/asset ratio; Case II - an operation with a 65 percent debt/asset ratio; Case III - an operation with a 65 percent debt/asset ratio with a majority of the farm land being leased. The analytical model simulates the annual cash flows of a commercial agricultural operation for each investment scenario over a 30-year period. Stochastic rates of return, generated using a vector-autoregressive (VAR) model, are incorporated into the simulation model. Each scenario is replicated 100 times using different vectors of stochastic rates of return. Results show investment in retirement vehicles does not significant reduce ending farm assets, regardless of investment strategy or cash preference of the producer. Use of retirement vehicles does have a significant positive impact on ending net worth for the producer. IRAs are not significant investment tools for producers (or spouses) who are participants in another qualified retirement plan. Investment strategy has a major impact on ending net worth. Aggressive and dynamic (aggressive to conservative as retirement approaches) investment strategies dominate conservative and balanced strategies. Use of cash margin to prepay debt has no advantage over reinvesting in the farm. Retirement vehicles greatly improve the probability of meeting estimated family living needs during retirement, and generate greater diversity and liquidity of the retirement portfolio. Further, retirement vehicles are more important for producer with highly-leveraged operations and for producers who lease a majority of their assets. Ph. D. 2014-03-14T21:12:39Z 2014-03-14T21:12:39Z 1995 2008-06-06 2008-06-06 2008-06-06 Dissertation Text etd-06062008-155229 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/38097 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062008-155229/ en OCLC# 33191278 LD5655.V856_1995.W458.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ xii, 162 leaves BTD application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic vector-autoregression
LD5655.V856 1995.W458
spellingShingle vector-autoregression
LD5655.V856 1995.W458
White, Alexander B.
Pre- and post-retirement asset allocation: a simulation of retirement investment strategies for agricultural producers
description This research simulates pre-retirement investment scenarios for agricultural producers. Thirty-two investment scenarios are examined, with each scenario differing with respect to retirement vehicle, investment strategy of the producer, and the use of a cash margin for reinvestment in the operation versus prepaying term debt (cash preference). The retirement vehicles included in this study are Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), Simplified Employee Pension Plans (SEPs), and 401(k) plans. Investment strategies reflect the producer's preference for investing in conservative, balanced, or aggressive assets, or a combination of these assets. Further, these scenarios are examined for three methods of capitalization: Case I- an operation with a 50 percent debt/asset ratio; Case II - an operation with a 65 percent debt/asset ratio; Case III - an operation with a 65 percent debt/asset ratio with a majority of the farm land being leased. The analytical model simulates the annual cash flows of a commercial agricultural operation for each investment scenario over a 30-year period. Stochastic rates of return, generated using a vector-autoregressive (VAR) model, are incorporated into the simulation model. Each scenario is replicated 100 times using different vectors of stochastic rates of return. Results show investment in retirement vehicles does not significant reduce ending farm assets, regardless of investment strategy or cash preference of the producer. Use of retirement vehicles does have a significant positive impact on ending net worth for the producer. IRAs are not significant investment tools for producers (or spouses) who are participants in another qualified retirement plan. Investment strategy has a major impact on ending net worth. Aggressive and dynamic (aggressive to conservative as retirement approaches) investment strategies dominate conservative and balanced strategies. Use of cash margin to prepay debt has no advantage over reinvesting in the farm. Retirement vehicles greatly improve the probability of meeting estimated family living needs during retirement, and generate greater diversity and liquidity of the retirement portfolio. Further, retirement vehicles are more important for producer with highly-leveraged operations and for producers who lease a majority of their assets. === Ph. D.
author2 Agricultural and Applied Economics
author_facet Agricultural and Applied Economics
White, Alexander B.
author White, Alexander B.
author_sort White, Alexander B.
title Pre- and post-retirement asset allocation: a simulation of retirement investment strategies for agricultural producers
title_short Pre- and post-retirement asset allocation: a simulation of retirement investment strategies for agricultural producers
title_full Pre- and post-retirement asset allocation: a simulation of retirement investment strategies for agricultural producers
title_fullStr Pre- and post-retirement asset allocation: a simulation of retirement investment strategies for agricultural producers
title_full_unstemmed Pre- and post-retirement asset allocation: a simulation of retirement investment strategies for agricultural producers
title_sort pre- and post-retirement asset allocation: a simulation of retirement investment strategies for agricultural producers
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/38097
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062008-155229/
work_keys_str_mv AT whitealexanderb preandpostretirementassetallocationasimulationofretirementinvestmentstrategiesforagriculturalproducers
_version_ 1719399300481417216