Testing Regulatory Fit in the Context of Performance Feedback
This study extended previous research by applying Higgins (2007) theory of Regulatory Fit to the context of performance feedback. Participants worked on an in-basket task in two 30 minute segments. Following the first 30 minutes segment, they were given recommendations for improving their performanc...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Virginia Tech
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/37798 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05132010-084725/ |
id |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-37798 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-377982020-09-26T05:34:20Z Testing Regulatory Fit in the Context of Performance Feedback Holmes, Jaron Todd Psychology Hauenstein, Neil M. A. Geller, E. Scott Foti, Roseanne J. Axsom, Danny K. Performance Feedback Regulatory Fit Regulatory Focus Self-Regulation Performance Management. Message Framing Motivation Persuasive Messages This study extended previous research by applying Higgins (2007) theory of Regulatory Fit to the context of performance feedback. Participants worked on an in-basket task in two 30 minute segments. Following the first 30 minutes segment, they were given recommendations for improving their performance framed in a manner that either did or did not fit their motivational orientation. Hypotheses predicted that compared to instances of non-fit, conditions of regulatory fit between recommendation frame (Eager vs. Vigilant) and motivational orientation (Promotion vs. Prevention) would have a significantly greater, positive impact on the following three outcomes: 1) Variety and Frequency of Feedback Use, 2) Feedback Recall, and 3) Attitudes Following Feedback. Overall results supported this assertion. Participants in condition of regulatory fit engaged in a significantly greater variety of behaviors and did so more frequently than those assigned to non-fit conditions. And while the effect of regulatory fit on feedback recall was not significant, it did approach significance (p = .07) and produced a pattern of results consistent with the predictions of regulatory fit. Counter to previous research, regulatory fit did not have significant impact on Attitudes Following Feedback in the current study. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed. Ph. D. 2014-03-14T21:11:01Z 2014-03-14T21:11:01Z 2010-04-30 2010-05-13 2010-06-14 2010-06-14 Dissertation etd-05132010-084725 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/37798 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05132010-084725/ Holmes_J.T._D_2010.pdf IRB_approval_letter_JTH_Dissertation.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Performance Feedback Regulatory Fit Regulatory Focus Self-Regulation Performance Management. Message Framing Motivation Persuasive Messages |
spellingShingle |
Performance Feedback Regulatory Fit Regulatory Focus Self-Regulation Performance Management. Message Framing Motivation Persuasive Messages Holmes, Jaron Todd Testing Regulatory Fit in the Context of Performance Feedback |
description |
This study extended previous research by applying Higgins (2007) theory of Regulatory Fit to the context of performance feedback. Participants worked on an in-basket task in two 30 minute segments. Following the first 30 minutes segment, they were given recommendations for improving their performance framed in a manner that either did or did not fit their motivational orientation. Hypotheses predicted that compared to instances of non-fit, conditions of regulatory fit between recommendation frame (Eager vs. Vigilant) and motivational orientation (Promotion vs. Prevention) would have a significantly greater, positive impact on the following three outcomes: 1) Variety and Frequency of Feedback Use, 2) Feedback Recall, and 3) Attitudes Following Feedback. Overall results supported this assertion. Participants in condition of regulatory fit engaged in a significantly greater variety of behaviors and did so more frequently than those assigned to non-fit conditions. And while the effect of regulatory fit on feedback recall was not significant, it did approach significance (p = .07) and produced a pattern of results consistent with the predictions of regulatory fit. Counter to previous research, regulatory fit did not have significant impact on Attitudes Following Feedback in the current study. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed. === Ph. D. |
author2 |
Psychology |
author_facet |
Psychology Holmes, Jaron Todd |
author |
Holmes, Jaron Todd |
author_sort |
Holmes, Jaron Todd |
title |
Testing Regulatory Fit in the Context of Performance Feedback |
title_short |
Testing Regulatory Fit in the Context of Performance Feedback |
title_full |
Testing Regulatory Fit in the Context of Performance Feedback |
title_fullStr |
Testing Regulatory Fit in the Context of Performance Feedback |
title_full_unstemmed |
Testing Regulatory Fit in the Context of Performance Feedback |
title_sort |
testing regulatory fit in the context of performance feedback |
publisher |
Virginia Tech |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/37798 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05132010-084725/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT holmesjarontodd testingregulatoryfitinthecontextofperformancefeedback |
_version_ |
1719341613226917888 |