Evaluation of a Strut-Plasma Torch Combination as a Supersonic Igniter-Flameholder
As the flight speeds of aircraft are increased above Mach 5, efficient methods of propulsion are needed. Scramjets may be a solution to this problem. Supersonic combustion is one of the main challenges involved in the operation of a Scramjet engine. In general, both an igniter and a flameholder a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Virginia Tech
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/36461 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12272005-111912/ |
id |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-36461 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-364612020-09-29T05:41:21Z Evaluation of a Strut-Plasma Torch Combination as a Supersonic Igniter-Flameholder Mozingo, Joseph Alexander Mechanical Engineering O'Brien, Walter F. Jr. Vandsburger, Uri Schetz, Joseph A. strut plasma torch supersonic combustion As the flight speeds of aircraft are increased above Mach 5, efficient methods of propulsion are needed. Scramjets may be a solution to this problem. Supersonic combustion is one of the main challenges involved in the operation of a Scramjet engine. In general, both an igniter and a flameholder are needed to achieve and maintain supersonic combustion. The current work examines a plasma torch-strut combination as an igniter-flameholder. The plasma torch-strut combination was tested in the Virginia Tech unheated supersonic wind tunnel at Mach 2.4. Pressure and temperature sampling, filtered photography, and spectroscopic measurements were used to compare different test cases. These results provide both qualitative and quantitative results on how the combination responds to changes in the mass flow rate of fuel and the power to the plasma torch. The key conclusions of the work were the following: 1. Tests showed that an exothermic reaction takes place. 2. The amount of heat release increases with an increase in the mass flow rate of fuel. 3. The plasma torch-fuel injector interaction caused the heat release to be well above the tunnel floor and sometimes off the strut centerline 4. One change in the fuel injector pattern caused more temperature rise near the floor of the tunnel. 5. The flow penetration height of the plasma torch alone was reduced by the fuel-plasma torch interaction. 6. Moving the strut upstream reduced the measured temperature rise at a fixed downstream location, but increased the penetration height of the plasma torch. 7. The computed heat release was found to be small compared to the potential heat release from all the fuel burning. 8. The amount of temperature rise caused by the fuel is not greatly affected by the power to the plasma torch. Master of Science 2014-03-14T20:50:50Z 2014-03-14T20:50:50Z 2004-02-23 2005-12-27 2006-03-15 2006-03-15 Thesis etd-12272005-111912 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/36461 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12272005-111912/ Revised_Mozingo_Thesis_R8_3-10-06.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf Virginia Tech |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
strut plasma torch supersonic combustion |
spellingShingle |
strut plasma torch supersonic combustion Mozingo, Joseph Alexander Evaluation of a Strut-Plasma Torch Combination as a Supersonic Igniter-Flameholder |
description |
As the flight speeds of aircraft are increased above Mach 5, efficient methods of propulsion are needed. Scramjets may be a solution to this problem. Supersonic combustion is one of the main challenges involved in the operation of a Scramjet engine. In general, both an igniter and a flameholder are needed to achieve and maintain supersonic combustion.
The current work examines a plasma torch-strut combination as an igniter-flameholder. The plasma torch-strut combination was tested in the Virginia Tech unheated supersonic wind tunnel at Mach 2.4. Pressure and temperature sampling, filtered photography, and spectroscopic measurements were used to compare different test cases. These results provide both qualitative and quantitative results on how the combination responds to changes in the mass flow rate of fuel and the power to the plasma torch.
The key conclusions of the work were the following:
1. Tests showed that an exothermic reaction takes place.
2. The amount of heat release increases with an increase in the mass flow rate of fuel.
3. The plasma torch-fuel injector interaction caused the heat release to be well above the tunnel floor and sometimes off the strut centerline
4. One change in the fuel injector pattern caused more temperature rise near the floor of the tunnel.
5. The flow penetration height of the plasma torch alone was reduced by the fuel-plasma torch interaction.
6. Moving the strut upstream reduced the measured temperature rise at a fixed downstream location, but increased the penetration height of the plasma torch.
7. The computed heat release was found to be small compared to the potential heat release from all the fuel burning.
8. The amount of temperature rise caused by the fuel is not greatly affected by the power to the plasma torch. === Master of Science |
author2 |
Mechanical Engineering |
author_facet |
Mechanical Engineering Mozingo, Joseph Alexander |
author |
Mozingo, Joseph Alexander |
author_sort |
Mozingo, Joseph Alexander |
title |
Evaluation of a Strut-Plasma Torch Combination as a Supersonic Igniter-Flameholder |
title_short |
Evaluation of a Strut-Plasma Torch Combination as a Supersonic Igniter-Flameholder |
title_full |
Evaluation of a Strut-Plasma Torch Combination as a Supersonic Igniter-Flameholder |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of a Strut-Plasma Torch Combination as a Supersonic Igniter-Flameholder |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of a Strut-Plasma Torch Combination as a Supersonic Igniter-Flameholder |
title_sort |
evaluation of a strut-plasma torch combination as a supersonic igniter-flameholder |
publisher |
Virginia Tech |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/36461 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-12272005-111912/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mozingojosephalexander evaluationofastrutplasmatorchcombinationasasupersonicigniterflameholder |
_version_ |
1719345242267713536 |