Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation

Twenty cantilever diaphragm tests were performed in the Structures and Materials Laboratory at Virginia Tech. The tests included both deep deck and cellular deck profiles with varying structural and side-lap connections. The tests were conducted with three different structural connections: screws, p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bagwell, Jonathan
Other Authors: Civil Engineering
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33688
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06222007-141409/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-33688
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-336882020-09-26T05:37:59Z Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation Bagwell, Jonathan Civil Engineering Easterling, William Samuel Roberts-Wollmann, Carin L. Murray, Thomas M. Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength Diaphragm Stiffness Cold Formed Steel Deep Deck Twenty cantilever diaphragm tests were performed in the Structures and Materials Laboratory at Virginia Tech. The tests included both deep deck and cellular deck profiles with varying structural and side-lap connections. The tests were conducted with three different structural connections: screws, pins and welds and two different side-lap connections: screws and button punch. <p> The tests were conducted and both load and deflection of the diaphragms were recorded. The current International Code Council, ICC, evaluation procedure shows that there are two different methods for measuring diaphragm deflection. The first method was by measuring specific corner displacements and making corrections to remove any rigid body motion. The second method is by measuring the deflection of the diagonals of the diaphragm. In this study both measurements were taken to do a comparison of the results that were obtained. Both strength and stiffness values were calculated based on the Steel Deck Institute (SDI) Diaphragm Design Manual (2004) and modifications described by Luttrell (2005). The paper by Luttrell (2005) only recommends modifications for the calculation of diaphragm stiffness. The data obtained from the tests were compared to the SDI calculations to distinguish any noticeable trends. Modifications are recommended regarding diaphragm strength and further research is suggested to create a better stiffness prediction of diaphragms. Master of Science 2014-03-14T20:40:21Z 2014-03-14T20:40:21Z 2007-06-13 2007-06-22 2012-04-30 2007-08-03 Thesis etd-06222007-141409 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33688 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06222007-141409/ ThesisJonathanBagwell.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Cellular Deck
Diaphragm Strength
Diaphragm Stiffness
Cold Formed Steel
Deep Deck
spellingShingle Cellular Deck
Diaphragm Strength
Diaphragm Stiffness
Cold Formed Steel
Deep Deck
Bagwell, Jonathan
Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation
description Twenty cantilever diaphragm tests were performed in the Structures and Materials Laboratory at Virginia Tech. The tests included both deep deck and cellular deck profiles with varying structural and side-lap connections. The tests were conducted with three different structural connections: screws, pins and welds and two different side-lap connections: screws and button punch. <p> The tests were conducted and both load and deflection of the diaphragms were recorded. The current International Code Council, ICC, evaluation procedure shows that there are two different methods for measuring diaphragm deflection. The first method was by measuring specific corner displacements and making corrections to remove any rigid body motion. The second method is by measuring the deflection of the diagonals of the diaphragm. In this study both measurements were taken to do a comparison of the results that were obtained. Both strength and stiffness values were calculated based on the Steel Deck Institute (SDI) Diaphragm Design Manual (2004) and modifications described by Luttrell (2005). The paper by Luttrell (2005) only recommends modifications for the calculation of diaphragm stiffness. The data obtained from the tests were compared to the SDI calculations to distinguish any noticeable trends. Modifications are recommended regarding diaphragm strength and further research is suggested to create a better stiffness prediction of diaphragms. === Master of Science
author2 Civil Engineering
author_facet Civil Engineering
Bagwell, Jonathan
author Bagwell, Jonathan
author_sort Bagwell, Jonathan
title Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation
title_short Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation
title_full Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation
title_fullStr Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation
title_sort deep deck and cellular deck diaphragm strength and stiffness evaluation
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33688
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06222007-141409/
work_keys_str_mv AT bagwelljonathan deepdeckandcellulardeckdiaphragmstrengthandstiffnessevaluation
_version_ 1719342720286195712