Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation
Twenty cantilever diaphragm tests were performed in the Structures and Materials Laboratory at Virginia Tech. The tests included both deep deck and cellular deck profiles with varying structural and side-lap connections. The tests were conducted with three different structural connections: screws, p...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Virginia Tech
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33688 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06222007-141409/ |
id |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-33688 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-336882020-09-26T05:37:59Z Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation Bagwell, Jonathan Civil Engineering Easterling, William Samuel Roberts-Wollmann, Carin L. Murray, Thomas M. Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength Diaphragm Stiffness Cold Formed Steel Deep Deck Twenty cantilever diaphragm tests were performed in the Structures and Materials Laboratory at Virginia Tech. The tests included both deep deck and cellular deck profiles with varying structural and side-lap connections. The tests were conducted with three different structural connections: screws, pins and welds and two different side-lap connections: screws and button punch. <p> The tests were conducted and both load and deflection of the diaphragms were recorded. The current International Code Council, ICC, evaluation procedure shows that there are two different methods for measuring diaphragm deflection. The first method was by measuring specific corner displacements and making corrections to remove any rigid body motion. The second method is by measuring the deflection of the diagonals of the diaphragm. In this study both measurements were taken to do a comparison of the results that were obtained. Both strength and stiffness values were calculated based on the Steel Deck Institute (SDI) Diaphragm Design Manual (2004) and modifications described by Luttrell (2005). The paper by Luttrell (2005) only recommends modifications for the calculation of diaphragm stiffness. The data obtained from the tests were compared to the SDI calculations to distinguish any noticeable trends. Modifications are recommended regarding diaphragm strength and further research is suggested to create a better stiffness prediction of diaphragms. Master of Science 2014-03-14T20:40:21Z 2014-03-14T20:40:21Z 2007-06-13 2007-06-22 2012-04-30 2007-08-03 Thesis etd-06222007-141409 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33688 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06222007-141409/ ThesisJonathanBagwell.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf Virginia Tech |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength Diaphragm Stiffness Cold Formed Steel Deep Deck |
spellingShingle |
Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength Diaphragm Stiffness Cold Formed Steel Deep Deck Bagwell, Jonathan Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation |
description |
Twenty cantilever diaphragm tests were performed in the Structures and Materials Laboratory at Virginia Tech. The tests included both deep deck and cellular deck profiles with varying structural and side-lap connections. The tests were conducted with three different structural connections: screws, pins and welds and two different side-lap connections: screws and button punch. <p>
The tests were conducted and both load and deflection of the diaphragms were recorded. The current International Code Council, ICC, evaluation procedure shows that there are two different methods for measuring diaphragm deflection. The first method was by measuring specific corner displacements and making corrections to remove any rigid body motion. The second method is by measuring the deflection of the diagonals of the diaphragm. In this study both measurements were taken to do a comparison of the results that were obtained.
Both strength and stiffness values were calculated based on the Steel Deck Institute (SDI) Diaphragm Design Manual (2004) and modifications described by Luttrell (2005). The paper by Luttrell (2005) only recommends modifications for the calculation of diaphragm stiffness. The data obtained from the tests were compared to the SDI calculations to distinguish any noticeable trends. Modifications are recommended regarding diaphragm strength and further research is suggested to create a better stiffness prediction of diaphragms. === Master of Science |
author2 |
Civil Engineering |
author_facet |
Civil Engineering Bagwell, Jonathan |
author |
Bagwell, Jonathan |
author_sort |
Bagwell, Jonathan |
title |
Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation |
title_short |
Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation |
title_full |
Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation |
title_fullStr |
Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deep Deck and Cellular Deck Diaphragm Strength and Stiffness Evaluation |
title_sort |
deep deck and cellular deck diaphragm strength and stiffness evaluation |
publisher |
Virginia Tech |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33688 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06222007-141409/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bagwelljonathan deepdeckandcellulardeckdiaphragmstrengthandstiffnessevaluation |
_version_ |
1719342720286195712 |