Automatic Processing of Musical and Phonemic Sounds: Differences Between Musicians and Nonmusicians

The purpose of the present study was to examine the ability of musicians to preattentively process musical and phonemic information, as assessed by event-related potentials (ERPs), compared with nonmusicians. Participants were musicians (N=22; at least 10 years of formal training) and nonmusicians...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alfaro, Jennifer Nicole
Other Authors: Psychology
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
MMN
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33464
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06072002-111516/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-33464
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-334642020-09-26T05:35:51Z Automatic Processing of Musical and Phonemic Sounds: Differences Between Musicians and Nonmusicians Alfaro, Jennifer Nicole Psychology Crawford, Helen J. Harrison, David W. Bell, Martha Ann musicians preattention MMN The purpose of the present study was to examine the ability of musicians to preattentively process musical and phonemic information, as assessed by event-related potentials (ERPs), compared with nonmusicians. Participants were musicians (N=22; at least 10 years of formal training) and nonmusicians (N=22; no musical training) from the Virginia Tech community. Participants focused on a video and were instructed to ignore auditory stimuli. Simultaneous to the video presentation, auditory stimuli (60dB) in an oddball paradigm (80% standard, 20% deviant) were presented in 4 conditions (500 stimuli each): chord, phoneme, chord interval, and tone interval. EEG was recorded during each condition. The mismatch negativity (MMN) was identified by subtracting ERPs to standard auditory stimuli from ERPs to deviant auditory stimuli for each of the four qualitatively different conditions. Superior preattentive auditory processing in musicians was found most obviously during the presentation of chords, with no evidence of such superiority during phonemic processing and interval processing. As predicted, during the tone interval condition, musicians had a greater MMN peak amplitude in the central region, and had a greater MMN mean amplitude in the anterior frontal, frontal, frontocentral, and central regions. Contrary to the hypothesis, this did not emerge in the chord, phoneme, or chord interval conditions. As predicted, the MMN latency was shorter for musicians than nonmusicians in the frontocentral region during the phoneme condition. Contrary to the hypothesis, this did not emerge in the chord, chord interval, or tone interval conditions. Differential hemisphere effects were found between groups for MMN latency in the phoneme condition but not the others. Contrary to the hypotheses, no differences were found for MMN amplitude. As predicted, and consistent with Koelsch et al. (1999), musicians were more likely to exhibit an MMN than nonmusicians in the chord condition. Finally, there was the expected stronger preattentive processing in the right hemisphere MMN for the musical stimuli. Contrary to the literature, there was an unexpected stronger right hemisphere bias for phonemic stimuli. Master of Science 2014-03-14T20:39:33Z 2014-03-14T20:39:33Z 2002-04-11 2002-06-07 2006-06-26 2002-06-26 Thesis etd-06072002-111516 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33464 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06072002-111516/ FINALTHESIS.PDF In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic musicians
preattention
MMN
spellingShingle musicians
preattention
MMN
Alfaro, Jennifer Nicole
Automatic Processing of Musical and Phonemic Sounds: Differences Between Musicians and Nonmusicians
description The purpose of the present study was to examine the ability of musicians to preattentively process musical and phonemic information, as assessed by event-related potentials (ERPs), compared with nonmusicians. Participants were musicians (N=22; at least 10 years of formal training) and nonmusicians (N=22; no musical training) from the Virginia Tech community. Participants focused on a video and were instructed to ignore auditory stimuli. Simultaneous to the video presentation, auditory stimuli (60dB) in an oddball paradigm (80% standard, 20% deviant) were presented in 4 conditions (500 stimuli each): chord, phoneme, chord interval, and tone interval. EEG was recorded during each condition. The mismatch negativity (MMN) was identified by subtracting ERPs to standard auditory stimuli from ERPs to deviant auditory stimuli for each of the four qualitatively different conditions. Superior preattentive auditory processing in musicians was found most obviously during the presentation of chords, with no evidence of such superiority during phonemic processing and interval processing. As predicted, during the tone interval condition, musicians had a greater MMN peak amplitude in the central region, and had a greater MMN mean amplitude in the anterior frontal, frontal, frontocentral, and central regions. Contrary to the hypothesis, this did not emerge in the chord, phoneme, or chord interval conditions. As predicted, the MMN latency was shorter for musicians than nonmusicians in the frontocentral region during the phoneme condition. Contrary to the hypothesis, this did not emerge in the chord, chord interval, or tone interval conditions. Differential hemisphere effects were found between groups for MMN latency in the phoneme condition but not the others. Contrary to the hypotheses, no differences were found for MMN amplitude. As predicted, and consistent with Koelsch et al. (1999), musicians were more likely to exhibit an MMN than nonmusicians in the chord condition. Finally, there was the expected stronger preattentive processing in the right hemisphere MMN for the musical stimuli. Contrary to the literature, there was an unexpected stronger right hemisphere bias for phonemic stimuli. === Master of Science
author2 Psychology
author_facet Psychology
Alfaro, Jennifer Nicole
author Alfaro, Jennifer Nicole
author_sort Alfaro, Jennifer Nicole
title Automatic Processing of Musical and Phonemic Sounds: Differences Between Musicians and Nonmusicians
title_short Automatic Processing of Musical and Phonemic Sounds: Differences Between Musicians and Nonmusicians
title_full Automatic Processing of Musical and Phonemic Sounds: Differences Between Musicians and Nonmusicians
title_fullStr Automatic Processing of Musical and Phonemic Sounds: Differences Between Musicians and Nonmusicians
title_full_unstemmed Automatic Processing of Musical and Phonemic Sounds: Differences Between Musicians and Nonmusicians
title_sort automatic processing of musical and phonemic sounds: differences between musicians and nonmusicians
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/33464
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06072002-111516/
work_keys_str_mv AT alfarojennifernicole automaticprocessingofmusicalandphonemicsoundsdifferencesbetweenmusiciansandnonmusicians
_version_ 1719341934948909056