An Examination of the Reference Watershed Approach for TMDLs with Benthic Impairments

This research addresses the Reference Watershed Approach (RWA) in the TMDL process for benthic impairments. In the RWA, do different land use sources (DOQQ and NLCD) or use of alternative water quality models (GWLF and SWAT) result in different stressor loadings? Is there a difference in stressor lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wagner, Rachel Cain
Other Authors: Biological Systems Engineering
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32564
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05112004-101625/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-32564
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-325642020-09-26T05:38:19Z An Examination of the Reference Watershed Approach for TMDLs with Benthic Impairments Wagner, Rachel Cain Biological Systems Engineering Dillaha, Theo A. III Voshell, J. Reese Jr. Yagow, Eugene R. Mostaghimi, Saied benthic impairment water quality TMDL water quality model Reference Watershed Approach This research addresses the Reference Watershed Approach (RWA) in the TMDL process for benthic impairments. In the RWA, do different land use sources (DOQQ and NLCD) or use of alternative water quality models (GWLF and SWAT) result in different stressor loadings? Is there a difference in stressor loadings when different reference watersheds are used? Study results showed that using different land use sources resulted in required stressor reductions that were different by greater than 10%. In one scenario, use of the NLCD-based land use parameters results in 3.5 times greater reductions than use of DOQQ-based land use parameters. With respect to water quality model selection, in two of the three scenarios considered, a difference in stressor reduction requirements of greater than 10% resulted from using different models. Differences in load reduction requirements are also seen when different reference watersheds are used, regardless of the water quality model or the land use source used. Different references result in a difference of as much as 73% in required sediment reductions in the impaired watershed: the required reductions using one reference watershed are 6.2 times as great as when another is used. Possible alternatives to the RWA include water quality standards to set the target level for many of the common stressors on the benthic assemblage, regression equations that relate benthic stressors to the RBP II score, or averaging of stressor reduction requirements obtained from using the Reference Watershed Approach on several different reference watersheds. Master of Science 2014-03-14T20:36:16Z 2014-03-14T20:36:16Z 2004-04-22 2004-05-11 2004-05-13 2004-05-13 Thesis etd-05112004-101625 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32564 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05112004-101625/ WagnerThesisMS_1.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic benthic impairment
water quality
TMDL
water quality model
Reference Watershed Approach
spellingShingle benthic impairment
water quality
TMDL
water quality model
Reference Watershed Approach
Wagner, Rachel Cain
An Examination of the Reference Watershed Approach for TMDLs with Benthic Impairments
description This research addresses the Reference Watershed Approach (RWA) in the TMDL process for benthic impairments. In the RWA, do different land use sources (DOQQ and NLCD) or use of alternative water quality models (GWLF and SWAT) result in different stressor loadings? Is there a difference in stressor loadings when different reference watersheds are used? Study results showed that using different land use sources resulted in required stressor reductions that were different by greater than 10%. In one scenario, use of the NLCD-based land use parameters results in 3.5 times greater reductions than use of DOQQ-based land use parameters. With respect to water quality model selection, in two of the three scenarios considered, a difference in stressor reduction requirements of greater than 10% resulted from using different models. Differences in load reduction requirements are also seen when different reference watersheds are used, regardless of the water quality model or the land use source used. Different references result in a difference of as much as 73% in required sediment reductions in the impaired watershed: the required reductions using one reference watershed are 6.2 times as great as when another is used. Possible alternatives to the RWA include water quality standards to set the target level for many of the common stressors on the benthic assemblage, regression equations that relate benthic stressors to the RBP II score, or averaging of stressor reduction requirements obtained from using the Reference Watershed Approach on several different reference watersheds. === Master of Science
author2 Biological Systems Engineering
author_facet Biological Systems Engineering
Wagner, Rachel Cain
author Wagner, Rachel Cain
author_sort Wagner, Rachel Cain
title An Examination of the Reference Watershed Approach for TMDLs with Benthic Impairments
title_short An Examination of the Reference Watershed Approach for TMDLs with Benthic Impairments
title_full An Examination of the Reference Watershed Approach for TMDLs with Benthic Impairments
title_fullStr An Examination of the Reference Watershed Approach for TMDLs with Benthic Impairments
title_full_unstemmed An Examination of the Reference Watershed Approach for TMDLs with Benthic Impairments
title_sort examination of the reference watershed approach for tmdls with benthic impairments
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32564
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05112004-101625/
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnerrachelcain anexaminationofthereferencewatershedapproachfortmdlswithbenthicimpairments
AT wagnerrachelcain examinationofthereferencewatershedapproachfortmdlswithbenthicimpairments
_version_ 1719342656227639296