Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels

Helicopter operations in the vicinity of small naval surface vessels often require excessive pilot workload. Because of the unsteady flow field and large mean velocity gradients, the envelope for flight operations is limited. This experimental investigation uses a 1:144 scale model of the U.S. Nav...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shafer, Daniel Manfred
Other Authors: Aerospace and Ocean Engineering
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32427
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05092005-165137/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-32427
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-324272020-09-26T05:38:32Z Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels Shafer, Daniel Manfred Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Mason, William H. Devenport, William J. Findlay, David B. backward facing step frigate ship airwake flow control helicopter/ship operations airwake Helicopter operations in the vicinity of small naval surface vessels often require excessive pilot workload. Because of the unsteady flow field and large mean velocity gradients, the envelope for flight operations is limited. This experimental investigation uses a 1:144 scale model of the U.S. Navy destroyer DDG-81 to explore the problem. Both active and passive flow control techniques were used to improve the flow field in the helicopterâ s final decent onto the flight deck. Wind tunnel data was collected at a set of grid points over the shipâ s flight deck using a single component hotwire. Results show that the use of porous surfaces decreases the unsteadiness of the flow field. Further improvements are found by injecting air through these porous surfaces, causing a reduction in unsteadiness in the landing region of 6.6% at 0 degrees wind-over-deck (WOD) and 8.3% at 20 degrees WOD. Other passive configurations tested include fences placed around the hangar deck edges which move the unsteady shear layer away from the flight deck. Although these devices cause an increase in unsteadiness downstream of the edge of the fence when compared to the baseline, the reticulated foam fence caused an overall decrease in unsteadiness in the landing region of 12.1% at 20 degrees WOD. Master of Science 2014-03-14T20:35:49Z 2014-03-14T20:35:49Z 2005-04-27 2005-05-09 2005-05-16 2005-05-16 Thesis etd-05092005-165137 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32427 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05092005-165137/ thesis_final.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic backward facing step
frigate ship airwake
flow control
helicopter/ship operations
airwake
spellingShingle backward facing step
frigate ship airwake
flow control
helicopter/ship operations
airwake
Shafer, Daniel Manfred
Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels
description Helicopter operations in the vicinity of small naval surface vessels often require excessive pilot workload. Because of the unsteady flow field and large mean velocity gradients, the envelope for flight operations is limited. This experimental investigation uses a 1:144 scale model of the U.S. Navy destroyer DDG-81 to explore the problem. Both active and passive flow control techniques were used to improve the flow field in the helicopterâ s final decent onto the flight deck. Wind tunnel data was collected at a set of grid points over the shipâ s flight deck using a single component hotwire. Results show that the use of porous surfaces decreases the unsteadiness of the flow field. Further improvements are found by injecting air through these porous surfaces, causing a reduction in unsteadiness in the landing region of 6.6% at 0 degrees wind-over-deck (WOD) and 8.3% at 20 degrees WOD. Other passive configurations tested include fences placed around the hangar deck edges which move the unsteady shear layer away from the flight deck. Although these devices cause an increase in unsteadiness downstream of the edge of the fence when compared to the baseline, the reticulated foam fence caused an overall decrease in unsteadiness in the landing region of 12.1% at 20 degrees WOD. === Master of Science
author2 Aerospace and Ocean Engineering
author_facet Aerospace and Ocean Engineering
Shafer, Daniel Manfred
author Shafer, Daniel Manfred
author_sort Shafer, Daniel Manfred
title Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels
title_short Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels
title_full Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels
title_fullStr Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels
title_full_unstemmed Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels
title_sort active and passive flow control over the flight deck of small naval vessels
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32427
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05092005-165137/
work_keys_str_mv AT shaferdanielmanfred activeandpassiveflowcontrolovertheflightdeckofsmallnavalvessels
_version_ 1719342645173551104