Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels
Helicopter operations in the vicinity of small naval surface vessels often require excessive pilot workload. Because of the unsteady flow field and large mean velocity gradients, the envelope for flight operations is limited. This experimental investigation uses a 1:144 scale model of the U.S. Nav...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Virginia Tech
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32427 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05092005-165137/ |
id |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-32427 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-324272020-09-26T05:38:32Z Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels Shafer, Daniel Manfred Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Mason, William H. Devenport, William J. Findlay, David B. backward facing step frigate ship airwake flow control helicopter/ship operations airwake Helicopter operations in the vicinity of small naval surface vessels often require excessive pilot workload. Because of the unsteady flow field and large mean velocity gradients, the envelope for flight operations is limited. This experimental investigation uses a 1:144 scale model of the U.S. Navy destroyer DDG-81 to explore the problem. Both active and passive flow control techniques were used to improve the flow field in the helicopterâ s final decent onto the flight deck. Wind tunnel data was collected at a set of grid points over the shipâ s flight deck using a single component hotwire. Results show that the use of porous surfaces decreases the unsteadiness of the flow field. Further improvements are found by injecting air through these porous surfaces, causing a reduction in unsteadiness in the landing region of 6.6% at 0 degrees wind-over-deck (WOD) and 8.3% at 20 degrees WOD. Other passive configurations tested include fences placed around the hangar deck edges which move the unsteady shear layer away from the flight deck. Although these devices cause an increase in unsteadiness downstream of the edge of the fence when compared to the baseline, the reticulated foam fence caused an overall decrease in unsteadiness in the landing region of 12.1% at 20 degrees WOD. Master of Science 2014-03-14T20:35:49Z 2014-03-14T20:35:49Z 2005-04-27 2005-05-09 2005-05-16 2005-05-16 Thesis etd-05092005-165137 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32427 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05092005-165137/ thesis_final.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf Virginia Tech |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
backward facing step frigate ship airwake flow control helicopter/ship operations airwake |
spellingShingle |
backward facing step frigate ship airwake flow control helicopter/ship operations airwake Shafer, Daniel Manfred Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels |
description |
Helicopter operations in the vicinity of small naval surface vessels often require excessive pilot workload. Because of the unsteady flow field and large mean velocity gradients, the envelope for flight operations is limited. This experimental investigation uses a 1:144 scale model of the U.S. Navy destroyer DDG-81 to explore the problem. Both active and passive flow control techniques were used to improve the flow field in the helicopterâ s final decent onto the flight deck. Wind tunnel data was collected at a set of grid points over the shipâ s flight deck using a single component hotwire. Results show that the use of porous surfaces decreases the unsteadiness of the flow field. Further improvements are found by injecting air through these porous surfaces, causing a reduction in unsteadiness in the landing region of 6.6% at 0 degrees wind-over-deck (WOD) and 8.3% at 20 degrees WOD. Other passive configurations tested include fences placed around the hangar deck edges which move the unsteady shear layer away from the flight deck. Although these devices cause an increase in unsteadiness downstream of the edge of the fence when compared to the baseline, the reticulated foam fence caused an overall decrease in unsteadiness in the landing region of 12.1% at 20 degrees WOD. === Master of Science |
author2 |
Aerospace and Ocean Engineering |
author_facet |
Aerospace and Ocean Engineering Shafer, Daniel Manfred |
author |
Shafer, Daniel Manfred |
author_sort |
Shafer, Daniel Manfred |
title |
Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels |
title_short |
Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels |
title_full |
Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels |
title_fullStr |
Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels |
title_full_unstemmed |
Active and Passive Flow Control over the Flight Deck of Small Naval Vessels |
title_sort |
active and passive flow control over the flight deck of small naval vessels |
publisher |
Virginia Tech |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/32427 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-05092005-165137/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shaferdanielmanfred activeandpassiveflowcontrolovertheflightdeckofsmallnavalvessels |
_version_ |
1719342645173551104 |