Two Minds for One Vehicle: A Case Study in Deliberative and Reactive Navigation

There are two commonly accepted paradigms for organizing intelligence in robotic vehicles, namely reactive and deliberative. A third, a hybrid paradigm called integrated planning and execution, is considered a combination of the original two. Although these paradigms are well known to researchers,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leedy, Brett Michael
Other Authors: Mechanical Engineering
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/31666
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04092006-215052/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-31666
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-316662020-09-26T05:37:22Z Two Minds for One Vehicle: A Case Study in Deliberative and Reactive Navigation Leedy, Brett Michael Mechanical Engineering Reinholtz, Charles F. Wicks, Alfred L. Hong, Dennis W. Grand Challenge Reactive Autonomous Navigation Deliberative There are two commonly accepted paradigms for organizing intelligence in robotic vehicles, namely reactive and deliberative. A third, a hybrid paradigm called integrated planning and execution, is considered a combination of the original two. Although these paradigms are well known to researchers, there are few published examples directly comparing their application and performance on similar vehicles operating in identical environments. Virginia Techâ s participation with two nearly identical vehicles in the DARPA Grand Challenge afforded a practical opportunity for such a case study. Both base vehicles were developed by modifying Club Car Pioneer XRT 1500 on-demand four wheel drive base platforms. Cliff was designed to use the reactive paradigm, while Rocky was designed to use the deliberative paradigm. Both vehicles were initially outfitted with sensor suites and computational capabilities commensurate with the paradigm being employed. The author of this thesis coordinated the activities of the two teams of undergraduate and graduate students who implemented the respective designs and software. Both vehicles proved capable of off-road navigation, including road following and obstacle avoidance in complex desert terrain. In the end, however, the reactive paradigm proved to be smoother and more reliable than the deliberative paradigm under the conditions of our testing. While both vehicles were extensively tested and compared using the competing paradigms, the team modified Rocky to use the more effective reactive paradigm for the Grand Challenge events. The deliberative case shows much promise for complex navigation, but added unnecessary complexity to desert road navigation. This case study, while necessarily limited in scope, may help to shed additional light on the tradeoffs and performance of competing approaches to machine intelligence. Master of Science 2014-03-14T20:33:18Z 2014-03-14T20:33:18Z 2006-03-29 2006-04-09 2006-05-11 2006-05-11 Thesis etd-04092006-215052 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/31666 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04092006-215052/ BML_Thesis_3.2.pdf Data_Logs.zip In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf application/octet-stream Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Grand Challenge
Reactive
Autonomous Navigation
Deliberative
spellingShingle Grand Challenge
Reactive
Autonomous Navigation
Deliberative
Leedy, Brett Michael
Two Minds for One Vehicle: A Case Study in Deliberative and Reactive Navigation
description There are two commonly accepted paradigms for organizing intelligence in robotic vehicles, namely reactive and deliberative. A third, a hybrid paradigm called integrated planning and execution, is considered a combination of the original two. Although these paradigms are well known to researchers, there are few published examples directly comparing their application and performance on similar vehicles operating in identical environments. Virginia Techâ s participation with two nearly identical vehicles in the DARPA Grand Challenge afforded a practical opportunity for such a case study. Both base vehicles were developed by modifying Club Car Pioneer XRT 1500 on-demand four wheel drive base platforms. Cliff was designed to use the reactive paradigm, while Rocky was designed to use the deliberative paradigm. Both vehicles were initially outfitted with sensor suites and computational capabilities commensurate with the paradigm being employed. The author of this thesis coordinated the activities of the two teams of undergraduate and graduate students who implemented the respective designs and software. Both vehicles proved capable of off-road navigation, including road following and obstacle avoidance in complex desert terrain. In the end, however, the reactive paradigm proved to be smoother and more reliable than the deliberative paradigm under the conditions of our testing. While both vehicles were extensively tested and compared using the competing paradigms, the team modified Rocky to use the more effective reactive paradigm for the Grand Challenge events. The deliberative case shows much promise for complex navigation, but added unnecessary complexity to desert road navigation. This case study, while necessarily limited in scope, may help to shed additional light on the tradeoffs and performance of competing approaches to machine intelligence. === Master of Science
author2 Mechanical Engineering
author_facet Mechanical Engineering
Leedy, Brett Michael
author Leedy, Brett Michael
author_sort Leedy, Brett Michael
title Two Minds for One Vehicle: A Case Study in Deliberative and Reactive Navigation
title_short Two Minds for One Vehicle: A Case Study in Deliberative and Reactive Navigation
title_full Two Minds for One Vehicle: A Case Study in Deliberative and Reactive Navigation
title_fullStr Two Minds for One Vehicle: A Case Study in Deliberative and Reactive Navigation
title_full_unstemmed Two Minds for One Vehicle: A Case Study in Deliberative and Reactive Navigation
title_sort two minds for one vehicle: a case study in deliberative and reactive navigation
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/31666
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04092006-215052/
work_keys_str_mv AT leedybrettmichael twomindsforonevehicleacasestudyindeliberativeandreactivenavigation
_version_ 1719342207312330752