Bayesian Two Stage Design Under Model Uncertainty
Traditional single stage design optimality procedures can be used to efficiently generate data for an assumed model y = f(x<sup>(m)</sup>,b) + ε. The model assumptions include the form of f, the set of regressors, x<sup>(m)</sup> , and the distribution of ε....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
Virginia Tech
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/30303 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-155317220973210/ |
id |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-30303 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-303032021-04-27T05:32:37Z Bayesian Two Stage Design Under Model Uncertainty Neff, Angela R. Statistics Lentner, Marvin M. Foutz, Robert Arnold, Jesse C. Ye, Keying Myers, Raymond H. bayesian design optimality response surface two stage design LD5655.V856 1996.N444 Traditional single stage design optimality procedures can be used to efficiently generate data for an assumed model y = f(x<sup>(m)</sup>,b) + ε. The model assumptions include the form of f, the set of regressors, x<sup>(m)</sup> , and the distribution of ε. The nature of the response, y, often provides information about the model form (f) and the error distribution. It is more difficult to know, apriori, the specific set of regressors which will best explain the relationship between the response and a set of design (control) variables x. Misspecification of x<sup>(m)</sup> will result in a design which is efficient, but for the wrong model. A Bayesian two stage design approach makes it possible to efficiently design experiments when initial knowledge of x<sup>(m)</sup> is poor. This is accomplished by using a Bayesian optimality criterion in the first stage which is robust to model uncertainty. Bayesian analysis of first stage data reduces uncertainty associated with x<sup>(m)</sup>, enabling the remaining design points (second stage design) to be chosen with greater efficiency. The second stage design is then generated from an optimality procedure which incorporates the improved model knowledge. Using this approach, numerous two stage design procedures have been developed for the normal linear model. Extending this concept, a Bayesian design augmentation procedure has been developed for the purpose of efficiently obtaining data for variance modeling, when initial knowledge of the variance model is poor. Ph. D. 2014-03-14T20:21:19Z 2014-03-14T20:21:19Z 1997-01-16 1998-07-19 1997-01-16 1997-01-16 Dissertation Text etd-155317220973210 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/30303 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-155317220973210/ en OCLC# 38740969 etd.pdf DISSAA.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ x, 169 leaves application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
bayesian design optimality response surface two stage design LD5655.V856 1996.N444 |
spellingShingle |
bayesian design optimality response surface two stage design LD5655.V856 1996.N444 Neff, Angela R. Bayesian Two Stage Design Under Model Uncertainty |
description |
Traditional single stage design optimality procedures can be used to efficiently generate data for an assumed model y = f(x<sup>(m)</sup>,b) + ε. The model assumptions include the form of f, the set of regressors, x<sup>(m)</sup> , and the distribution of ε. The nature of the response, y, often provides information about the model form (f) and the error distribution. It is more difficult to know, apriori, the specific set of regressors which will best explain the relationship between the response and a set of design (control) variables x. Misspecification of x<sup>(m)</sup> will result in a design which is efficient, but for the wrong model.
A Bayesian two stage design approach makes it possible to efficiently design experiments when initial knowledge of x<sup>(m)</sup> is poor. This is accomplished by using a Bayesian optimality criterion in the first stage which is robust to model uncertainty. Bayesian analysis of first stage data reduces uncertainty associated with x<sup>(m)</sup>, enabling the remaining design points (second stage design) to be chosen with greater efficiency. The second stage design is then generated from an optimality procedure which incorporates the improved model knowledge. Using this approach, numerous two stage design procedures have been developed for the normal linear model. Extending this concept, a Bayesian design augmentation procedure has been developed for the purpose of efficiently obtaining data for variance modeling, when initial knowledge of the variance model is poor. === Ph. D. |
author2 |
Statistics |
author_facet |
Statistics Neff, Angela R. |
author |
Neff, Angela R. |
author_sort |
Neff, Angela R. |
title |
Bayesian Two Stage Design Under Model Uncertainty |
title_short |
Bayesian Two Stage Design Under Model Uncertainty |
title_full |
Bayesian Two Stage Design Under Model Uncertainty |
title_fullStr |
Bayesian Two Stage Design Under Model Uncertainty |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bayesian Two Stage Design Under Model Uncertainty |
title_sort |
bayesian two stage design under model uncertainty |
publisher |
Virginia Tech |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/30303 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-155317220973210/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT neffangelar bayesiantwostagedesignundermodeluncertainty |
_version_ |
1719399269419450368 |