Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type

This experimental study investigated the relationship between the independent measures of font selection, type size, and type rendering technology and the dependent measures of legibility, as measured by the Chapman-Cook speed of reading test, as well as comprehension, as measured by a series of que...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chandler, Scott Bondurant
Other Authors: Teaching and Learning
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29629
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11172001-152449/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-29629
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-296292020-09-26T05:32:28Z Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type Chandler, Scott Bondurant Teaching and Learning Hergert, Thomas Potter, Kenneth R. Sanders, Mark E. Holmes, Glen A. Doolittle, Peter E. education comprehension type size reading speed type rendering technology perceptual encoding speed of reading Palatino legibility sans-serif computer serif Helvetica orthochromatic font selection effectiveness type anti-alias typography This experimental study investigated the relationship between the independent measures of font selection, type size, and type rendering technology and the dependent measures of legibility, as measured by the Chapman-Cook speed of reading test, as well as comprehension, as measured by a series of questions from the verbal comprehension section of the Graduate Record Exam. An electronic instrument presented test items in 12 different typographic styles. The study tested 117 college students at a university in southwestern Virginia. Each participant encountered anti-alias type rendering style and the orthochromatic type rendering style while participants were randomly assigned to either Helvetica or Palatino (font selection) and 8, 10 or 12 point type size. Results indicated that the 12 point type size was read more quickly than either 8 point type or 10 point type. There was also an interaction between font selection and type rendering technology for speed of reading: Helvetica without an anti-alias was read more quickly than Helvetica with an anti-alias and more quickly than Palatino without an anti-alias. These findings contradict an earlier, similar study. There were no significant results with regard to comprehension. <i>[Vita removed Oct. 13, 2010. GMc]</i> Ph. D. 2014-03-14T20:18:40Z 2014-03-14T20:18:40Z 2001-10-08 2001-11-17 2007-10-13 2001-11-27 Dissertation etd-11172001-152449 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29629 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11172001-152449/ chandler-appendix.pdf chandler-vita.pdf chandler.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic education
comprehension
type size
reading speed
type rendering technology
perceptual encoding
speed of reading
Palatino
legibility
sans-serif
computer
serif
Helvetica
orthochromatic
font selection
effectiveness
type
anti-alias
typography
spellingShingle education
comprehension
type size
reading speed
type rendering technology
perceptual encoding
speed of reading
Palatino
legibility
sans-serif
computer
serif
Helvetica
orthochromatic
font selection
effectiveness
type
anti-alias
typography
Chandler, Scott Bondurant
Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type
description This experimental study investigated the relationship between the independent measures of font selection, type size, and type rendering technology and the dependent measures of legibility, as measured by the Chapman-Cook speed of reading test, as well as comprehension, as measured by a series of questions from the verbal comprehension section of the Graduate Record Exam. An electronic instrument presented test items in 12 different typographic styles. The study tested 117 college students at a university in southwestern Virginia. Each participant encountered anti-alias type rendering style and the orthochromatic type rendering style while participants were randomly assigned to either Helvetica or Palatino (font selection) and 8, 10 or 12 point type size. Results indicated that the 12 point type size was read more quickly than either 8 point type or 10 point type. There was also an interaction between font selection and type rendering technology for speed of reading: Helvetica without an anti-alias was read more quickly than Helvetica with an anti-alias and more quickly than Palatino without an anti-alias. These findings contradict an earlier, similar study. There were no significant results with regard to comprehension. <i>[Vita removed Oct. 13, 2010. GMc]</i> === Ph. D.
author2 Teaching and Learning
author_facet Teaching and Learning
Chandler, Scott Bondurant
author Chandler, Scott Bondurant
author_sort Chandler, Scott Bondurant
title Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type
title_short Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type
title_full Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type
title_fullStr Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type
title_sort comparing the legibility and comprehension of type size, font selection and rendering technology of onscreen type
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29629
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11172001-152449/
work_keys_str_mv AT chandlerscottbondurant comparingthelegibilityandcomprehensionoftypesizefontselectionandrenderingtechnologyofonscreentype
_version_ 1719341295398289408