Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type
This experimental study investigated the relationship between the independent measures of font selection, type size, and type rendering technology and the dependent measures of legibility, as measured by the Chapman-Cook speed of reading test, as well as comprehension, as measured by a series of que...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Virginia Tech
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29629 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11172001-152449/ |
id |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-29629 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-296292020-09-26T05:32:28Z Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type Chandler, Scott Bondurant Teaching and Learning Hergert, Thomas Potter, Kenneth R. Sanders, Mark E. Holmes, Glen A. Doolittle, Peter E. education comprehension type size reading speed type rendering technology perceptual encoding speed of reading Palatino legibility sans-serif computer serif Helvetica orthochromatic font selection effectiveness type anti-alias typography This experimental study investigated the relationship between the independent measures of font selection, type size, and type rendering technology and the dependent measures of legibility, as measured by the Chapman-Cook speed of reading test, as well as comprehension, as measured by a series of questions from the verbal comprehension section of the Graduate Record Exam. An electronic instrument presented test items in 12 different typographic styles. The study tested 117 college students at a university in southwestern Virginia. Each participant encountered anti-alias type rendering style and the orthochromatic type rendering style while participants were randomly assigned to either Helvetica or Palatino (font selection) and 8, 10 or 12 point type size. Results indicated that the 12 point type size was read more quickly than either 8 point type or 10 point type. There was also an interaction between font selection and type rendering technology for speed of reading: Helvetica without an anti-alias was read more quickly than Helvetica with an anti-alias and more quickly than Palatino without an anti-alias. These findings contradict an earlier, similar study. There were no significant results with regard to comprehension. <i>[Vita removed Oct. 13, 2010. GMc]</i> Ph. D. 2014-03-14T20:18:40Z 2014-03-14T20:18:40Z 2001-10-08 2001-11-17 2007-10-13 2001-11-27 Dissertation etd-11172001-152449 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29629 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11172001-152449/ chandler-appendix.pdf chandler-vita.pdf chandler.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
education comprehension type size reading speed type rendering technology perceptual encoding speed of reading Palatino legibility sans-serif computer serif Helvetica orthochromatic font selection effectiveness type anti-alias typography |
spellingShingle |
education comprehension type size reading speed type rendering technology perceptual encoding speed of reading Palatino legibility sans-serif computer serif Helvetica orthochromatic font selection effectiveness type anti-alias typography Chandler, Scott Bondurant Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type |
description |
This experimental study investigated the relationship between the independent measures of font selection, type size, and type rendering technology and the dependent measures of legibility, as measured by the Chapman-Cook speed of reading test, as well as comprehension, as measured by a series of questions from the verbal comprehension section of the Graduate Record Exam. An electronic instrument presented test items in 12 different typographic styles. The study tested 117 college students at a university in southwestern Virginia. Each participant encountered anti-alias type rendering style and the orthochromatic type rendering style while participants were randomly assigned to either Helvetica or Palatino (font selection) and 8, 10 or 12 point type size.
Results indicated that the 12 point type size was read more quickly than either 8 point type or 10 point type. There was also an interaction between font selection and type rendering technology for speed of reading: Helvetica without an anti-alias was read more quickly than Helvetica with an anti-alias and more quickly than Palatino without an anti-alias. These findings contradict an earlier, similar study.
There were no significant results with regard to comprehension.
<i>[Vita removed Oct. 13, 2010. GMc]</i> === Ph. D. |
author2 |
Teaching and Learning |
author_facet |
Teaching and Learning Chandler, Scott Bondurant |
author |
Chandler, Scott Bondurant |
author_sort |
Chandler, Scott Bondurant |
title |
Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type |
title_short |
Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type |
title_full |
Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type |
title_fullStr |
Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing the Legibility and Comprehension of Type Size, Font Selection and Rendering Technology of Onscreen Type |
title_sort |
comparing the legibility and comprehension of type size, font selection and rendering technology of onscreen type |
publisher |
Virginia Tech |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29629 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-11172001-152449/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chandlerscottbondurant comparingthelegibilityandcomprehensionoftypesizefontselectionandrenderingtechnologyofonscreentype |
_version_ |
1719341295398289408 |