Surface wave propagation in 3-D anelastic media
Lateral perturbations in anelasticity (Q) and wave speed together provide important constraints on thermal and chemical structures in the mantle. In present-day tomography studies of global wave speed and anelasticity, the significance of 3-D wave speed and 3-D Q structures on surface wave travel ti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Virginia Tech
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10919/28945 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-09112012-170402/ |
Summary: | Lateral perturbations in anelasticity (Q) and wave speed together provide important constraints
on thermal and chemical structures in the mantle. In present-day tomography studies of global wave
speed and anelasticity, the significance of 3-D wave speed and 3-D Q structures on surface wave
travel times and amplitudes has not been well understood. In this dissertation, the effects of lateral perturbations in anelasticity (Q) and wave speed on surface wave observables are quantified based upon wave propagation simulations in 3-D earth models using a Spectral Element Method.
Comparison between phase delays caused by 3-D wave speed structures and those caused by 3-D
Q variations show that anelastic dispersion due to lateral perturbation in Q is important in long-period surface wave and can account for 15-20% observed phase delays. For amplitude perturbations, elastic focusing/defocusing effects associated with 3-D wave speed structures are dominant while energy dissipation is important in short-period (â ¼ 50 s) surface waves but decreases quickly with increasing
wave period. Anelastic focusing/defocusing associated with 3-D anelastic dispersion becomes more important than wave attenuation in longer period surface waves.
In tomography studies, ray theory breaks down and finite frequency effects become important
when the length scale of heterogenities are smaller than seismic wavelength. Finite frequency effects in 3-D earth models are investigated by comparing theoretical predictions of travel times and amplitudes with â ground truthâ measurements made on synthetic seismograms generated in SEM
simulations. The comparisons show that finite frequency effects are stronger in amplitudes than in phases, especially at long periods. === Ph. D. |
---|