A Qualitative Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence

The purpose of this study was to explore women's dual experiences of IPV to examine whether their motivations fit the current framework on four types of intimate partner violence (IPV) in light of Johnson's typology, which includes: violent resistance (VR), situational couple violence (SCV...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Howard-Bostic, Chiquita DaJuan
Other Authors: Sociology
Format: Others
Published: Virginia Tech 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/26886
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04152011-013914/
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-26886
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-268862020-09-26T05:31:46Z A Qualitative Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence Howard-Bostic, Chiquita DaJuan Sociology Bailey, Carol A. Hawdon, James E. Graves, Ellington T. Kiecolt, K. Jill mutual violent combat situational couple violence violent resistance intimate terrorism female perpetrators intimate partner violence The purpose of this study was to explore women's dual experiences of IPV to examine whether their motivations fit the current framework on four types of intimate partner violence (IPV) in light of Johnson's typology, which includes: violent resistance (VR), situational couple violence (SCV), mutual violent combat (MVC), and intimate terrorism (IT) (Kelly and Johnson 2008). I applied these types of IPV to describe women's physical aggression, control, and emotional responses experienced and performed during IPV. Johnson's typology classified six of 10 participant experiences; to describe the remaining four, I applied blended types of IPV. Findings in this study indicated that VR and SCV overlooked women's use of controlling physical aggression; this study identified alternative concepts and additional dimensions of control and resistance, and introduced tempered violence resistance (TVR), a new IPV type to describe women's use of controlling physical aggression during protective violence. Correspondingly, findings also indicated that interpretations of physical aggression and control in MVC and IT did not consider wide-ranging degrees of control such as self-control, situational control, and partner control. Hence, distinctions between SCV or MVC and MVC or IT were limited by vague interpretations of control. Furthermore, VR, MVC, and IT did not fully describe women's emotional responses. These types of violence focused solely on the context of physical aggression and control, which minimized perceptions of conflict and omitted reported samples of motivations. Forthcoming studies applying Johnson's typology should include external contexts of relationship conflict and consider multiple types control and dimensions of resistance. Ph. D. 2014-03-14T20:09:42Z 2014-03-14T20:09:42Z 2011-04-05 2011-04-15 2011-05-17 2011-05-17 Dissertation etd-04152011-013914 http://hdl.handle.net/10919/26886 http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04152011-013914/ Howard-Bostic_CD_D_2011.pdf IRB_APPROVAL.pdf In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Tech
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic mutual violent combat
situational couple violence
violent resistance
intimate terrorism
female perpetrators
intimate partner violence
spellingShingle mutual violent combat
situational couple violence
violent resistance
intimate terrorism
female perpetrators
intimate partner violence
Howard-Bostic, Chiquita DaJuan
A Qualitative Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence
description The purpose of this study was to explore women's dual experiences of IPV to examine whether their motivations fit the current framework on four types of intimate partner violence (IPV) in light of Johnson's typology, which includes: violent resistance (VR), situational couple violence (SCV), mutual violent combat (MVC), and intimate terrorism (IT) (Kelly and Johnson 2008). I applied these types of IPV to describe women's physical aggression, control, and emotional responses experienced and performed during IPV. Johnson's typology classified six of 10 participant experiences; to describe the remaining four, I applied blended types of IPV. Findings in this study indicated that VR and SCV overlooked women's use of controlling physical aggression; this study identified alternative concepts and additional dimensions of control and resistance, and introduced tempered violence resistance (TVR), a new IPV type to describe women's use of controlling physical aggression during protective violence. Correspondingly, findings also indicated that interpretations of physical aggression and control in MVC and IT did not consider wide-ranging degrees of control such as self-control, situational control, and partner control. Hence, distinctions between SCV or MVC and MVC or IT were limited by vague interpretations of control. Furthermore, VR, MVC, and IT did not fully describe women's emotional responses. These types of violence focused solely on the context of physical aggression and control, which minimized perceptions of conflict and omitted reported samples of motivations. Forthcoming studies applying Johnson's typology should include external contexts of relationship conflict and consider multiple types control and dimensions of resistance. === Ph. D.
author2 Sociology
author_facet Sociology
Howard-Bostic, Chiquita DaJuan
author Howard-Bostic, Chiquita DaJuan
author_sort Howard-Bostic, Chiquita DaJuan
title A Qualitative Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence
title_short A Qualitative Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence
title_full A Qualitative Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence
title_fullStr A Qualitative Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence
title_full_unstemmed A Qualitative Analysis of Intimate Partner Violence
title_sort qualitative analysis of intimate partner violence
publisher Virginia Tech
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/26886
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-04152011-013914/
work_keys_str_mv AT howardbosticchiquitadajuan aqualitativeanalysisofintimatepartnerviolence
AT howardbosticchiquitadajuan qualitativeanalysisofintimatepartnerviolence
_version_ 1719340837091934208