A comparison of fusible interfacings commonly used with selected polyester/cotton shirting fabrics

The purpose of this research was to compare preshrunk and nonshrunk fabrics when fused to suitable weight interfacings by examination of rigidity, bond strength, and dimensional stability. More specifically, varying fiber content and three types of nonwoven interfacing were used. Preshinking consi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Multon, Helen Cecilia Foster
Other Authors: Clothing and Textiles
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10919/101460
id ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-101460
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VTETD-oai-vtechworks.lib.vt.edu-10919-1014602021-01-15T05:35:02Z A comparison of fusible interfacings commonly used with selected polyester/cotton shirting fabrics Multon, Helen Cecilia Foster Clothing and Textiles LD5655.V855 1985.M857 Fusible materials in sewing Interfacings (Clothing) The purpose of this research was to compare preshrunk and nonshrunk fabrics when fused to suitable weight interfacings by examination of rigidity, bond strength, and dimensional stability. More specifically, varying fiber content and three types of nonwoven interfacing were used. Preshinking consisted of a warm wash and tumble dry Preshrunk and unshrunk fabrics were fused to each of the three interfacings using an industrial steam press. Selected performance properties were measured after 1, 5, and 10 laundering periods. The data were subjected to a randomized complete block design analysis of variance to determine the significance cf main effects and interactions among variables. The .05 level of significance was used. The four fabric types were different from each other. fabric had a significant effect on all of the dependent variables: rigidity, bond strength, and dimensional stability. The three types of interfacings, although different, were not as dramatically different as were the fabrics. The type of interfacing had a statistically significant effect on two of the dependent variables, flexural rigidity and bond strength, but, had no significant effect upon the dimensional stability. The preshrinkage of the fabric had an effect on the flexural rigidity and bond strength, but had no effect on dimensional stability when measured in the weft direction. Prewashed fabrics were found to be slightly more rigid and exhibited much weaker fabric-interface bonds than the control samples. Evidence from this research suggested that shirting fabric should not be preshrunk prior to garment construction. M.S. 2020-12-15T19:11:41Z 2020-12-15T19:11:41Z 1985 Thesis Text http://hdl.handle.net/10919/101460 en OCLC# 13014647 In Copyright http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ viii, 102 leaves application/pdf application/pdf Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic LD5655.V855 1985.M857
Fusible materials in sewing
Interfacings (Clothing)
spellingShingle LD5655.V855 1985.M857
Fusible materials in sewing
Interfacings (Clothing)
Multon, Helen Cecilia Foster
A comparison of fusible interfacings commonly used with selected polyester/cotton shirting fabrics
description The purpose of this research was to compare preshrunk and nonshrunk fabrics when fused to suitable weight interfacings by examination of rigidity, bond strength, and dimensional stability. More specifically, varying fiber content and three types of nonwoven interfacing were used. Preshinking consisted of a warm wash and tumble dry Preshrunk and unshrunk fabrics were fused to each of the three interfacings using an industrial steam press. Selected performance properties were measured after 1, 5, and 10 laundering periods. The data were subjected to a randomized complete block design analysis of variance to determine the significance cf main effects and interactions among variables. The .05 level of significance was used. The four fabric types were different from each other. fabric had a significant effect on all of the dependent variables: rigidity, bond strength, and dimensional stability. The three types of interfacings, although different, were not as dramatically different as were the fabrics. The type of interfacing had a statistically significant effect on two of the dependent variables, flexural rigidity and bond strength, but, had no significant effect upon the dimensional stability. The preshrinkage of the fabric had an effect on the flexural rigidity and bond strength, but had no effect on dimensional stability when measured in the weft direction. Prewashed fabrics were found to be slightly more rigid and exhibited much weaker fabric-interface bonds than the control samples. Evidence from this research suggested that shirting fabric should not be preshrunk prior to garment construction. === M.S.
author2 Clothing and Textiles
author_facet Clothing and Textiles
Multon, Helen Cecilia Foster
author Multon, Helen Cecilia Foster
author_sort Multon, Helen Cecilia Foster
title A comparison of fusible interfacings commonly used with selected polyester/cotton shirting fabrics
title_short A comparison of fusible interfacings commonly used with selected polyester/cotton shirting fabrics
title_full A comparison of fusible interfacings commonly used with selected polyester/cotton shirting fabrics
title_fullStr A comparison of fusible interfacings commonly used with selected polyester/cotton shirting fabrics
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of fusible interfacings commonly used with selected polyester/cotton shirting fabrics
title_sort comparison of fusible interfacings commonly used with selected polyester/cotton shirting fabrics
publisher Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/10919/101460
work_keys_str_mv AT multonhelenceciliafoster acomparisonoffusibleinterfacingscommonlyusedwithselectedpolyestercottonshirtingfabrics
AT multonhelenceciliafoster comparisonoffusibleinterfacingscommonlyusedwithselectedpolyestercottonshirtingfabrics
_version_ 1719372952642781184