Material Footprint Assessment in a Global Input-Output Framework

Material flow-based indicators play an important role in indicator sets related to green and resource-efficient growth. This paper examines the global flows of materials and the amounts of materials directly and indirectly necessary to satisfy domestic final demand in different countries world-wide....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giljum, Stefan, Bruckner, Martin, Martinez, Aldo
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: Wiley 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://epub.wu.ac.at/4538/1/Giljum_et_al_2014_Material%2DFootprints_JIE.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12214
id ndltd-VIENNA-oai-epub.wu-wien.ac.at-4538
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VIENNA-oai-epub.wu-wien.ac.at-45382017-01-11T05:13:09Z Material Footprint Assessment in a Global Input-Output Framework Giljum, Stefan Bruckner, Martin Martinez, Aldo International Trade / Material Footprint / Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis / Raw Material Consumption / Sustainable Resource Management Material flow-based indicators play an important role in indicator sets related to green and resource-efficient growth. This paper examines the global flows of materials and the amounts of materials directly and indirectly necessary to satisfy domestic final demand in different countries world-wide. We calculate the indicator Raw Material Consumption (RMC), also referred to as Material Footprint (MF), by applying a global, multi-regional input-output (MRIO) model based on the GTAP database and extended by material extraction data. We examine world-wide patterns of material extraction and materials embodied in trade and consumption, investigating changes between 1997 and 2007. We find that flows of materials related to international trade have increased by almost 60% between 1997 and 2007. We show that the differences in Material Footprints per capita are huge, ranging from up to 100 tonnes in the rich, oil-exporting countries to values as low as 1.5 to 2 tonnes in some developing countries. We also quantify the differences between the indicators Domestic Material Consumption (DMC) and RMC, illustrating that net material exporters generally have a DMC larger than RMC, while the reverse is observed for net importers. Finally, we confirm the fact that most countries with stable or declining DMCs actually show increasing RMCs, indicating the occurrence of leakage effects, which are not fully captured by DMC. This challenges the world-wide use of DMC as a headline indicator for national material consumption and calls for the consideration of upstream material requirements of international trade flows. Wiley 2014-12-30 Article PeerReviewed en application/pdf http://epub.wu.ac.at/4538/1/Giljum_et_al_2014_Material%2DFootprints_JIE.pdf http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12214 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.12214/abstract http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12214 http://epub.wu.ac.at/4538/
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic International Trade / Material Footprint / Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis / Raw Material Consumption / Sustainable Resource Management
spellingShingle International Trade / Material Footprint / Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis / Raw Material Consumption / Sustainable Resource Management
Giljum, Stefan
Bruckner, Martin
Martinez, Aldo
Material Footprint Assessment in a Global Input-Output Framework
description Material flow-based indicators play an important role in indicator sets related to green and resource-efficient growth. This paper examines the global flows of materials and the amounts of materials directly and indirectly necessary to satisfy domestic final demand in different countries world-wide. We calculate the indicator Raw Material Consumption (RMC), also referred to as Material Footprint (MF), by applying a global, multi-regional input-output (MRIO) model based on the GTAP database and extended by material extraction data. We examine world-wide patterns of material extraction and materials embodied in trade and consumption, investigating changes between 1997 and 2007. We find that flows of materials related to international trade have increased by almost 60% between 1997 and 2007. We show that the differences in Material Footprints per capita are huge, ranging from up to 100 tonnes in the rich, oil-exporting countries to values as low as 1.5 to 2 tonnes in some developing countries. We also quantify the differences between the indicators Domestic Material Consumption (DMC) and RMC, illustrating that net material exporters generally have a DMC larger than RMC, while the reverse is observed for net importers. Finally, we confirm the fact that most countries with stable or declining DMCs actually show increasing RMCs, indicating the occurrence of leakage effects, which are not fully captured by DMC. This challenges the world-wide use of DMC as a headline indicator for national material consumption and calls for the consideration of upstream material requirements of international trade flows.
author Giljum, Stefan
Bruckner, Martin
Martinez, Aldo
author_facet Giljum, Stefan
Bruckner, Martin
Martinez, Aldo
author_sort Giljum, Stefan
title Material Footprint Assessment in a Global Input-Output Framework
title_short Material Footprint Assessment in a Global Input-Output Framework
title_full Material Footprint Assessment in a Global Input-Output Framework
title_fullStr Material Footprint Assessment in a Global Input-Output Framework
title_full_unstemmed Material Footprint Assessment in a Global Input-Output Framework
title_sort material footprint assessment in a global input-output framework
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2014
url http://epub.wu.ac.at/4538/1/Giljum_et_al_2014_Material%2DFootprints_JIE.pdf
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12214
work_keys_str_mv AT giljumstefan materialfootprintassessmentinaglobalinputoutputframework
AT brucknermartin materialfootprintassessmentinaglobalinputoutputframework
AT martinezaldo materialfootprintassessmentinaglobalinputoutputframework
_version_ 1718407795462635520