THE EFFECTS OF UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION PRACTICES ON LICENSING INCOME - A COMPARATIVE STUDY
This thesis focuses on comparing the effects of university technology commercialization practices on their licensing incomes. "High Output" and "High Activity" universities were selected from top U.S. research universities based on the level of resources that are invested in the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
VANDERBILT
2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07212004-120013/ |
id |
ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-07212004-120013 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-07212004-1200132013-01-08T17:16:00Z THE EFFECTS OF UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION PRACTICES ON LICENSING INCOME - A COMPARATIVE STUDY Lashley, Kisha Management of Technology This thesis focuses on comparing the effects of university technology commercialization practices on their licensing incomes. "High Output" and "High Activity" universities were selected from top U.S. research universities based on the level of resources that are invested in the technology transfer process, as opposed to the level of income generated as a result of licensing activities. We use the multiple case study method,consisting of four "High Outcome" and four "High Activity" universities. The principles of real options theory are used to compare and contrast the technology commercialization processes of the two groups, based on the premise that universities that employ a real options perspective in their technology transfer decisions, will have greater licensing incomes. Based on interviews with technology transfer directors at the universities in the sample, we conclude that the most critical factors affecting licensing income are faculty involvement in the technology marketing process and the level of evaluation of the feasibility of start-up opportunities, prior to engaging in such investments. Dr. David Dilts Dr. Christopher McKinney VANDERBILT 2004-07-22 text application/pdf http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07212004-120013/ http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07212004-120013/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Management of Technology |
spellingShingle |
Management of Technology Lashley, Kisha THE EFFECTS OF UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION PRACTICES ON LICENSING INCOME - A COMPARATIVE STUDY |
description |
This thesis focuses on comparing the effects of university technology commercialization practices on their licensing incomes. "High Output" and "High Activity" universities were selected from top U.S. research universities based on the level of resources that are invested in the technology transfer process, as opposed to the level of income generated as
a result of licensing activities. We use the multiple case study method,consisting of four "High Outcome" and four "High Activity" universities. The principles of real options theory are used to compare and contrast the
technology commercialization processes of the two groups, based on the premise that universities that employ a real options perspective in their technology transfer decisions, will have greater licensing incomes. Based on interviews with technology transfer directors at the universities in the sample, we conclude that the most critical factors affecting licensing income are faculty involvement in the technology marketing process and the level of evaluation of the feasibility of start-up opportunities, prior to engaging in such investments.
|
author2 |
Dr. David Dilts |
author_facet |
Dr. David Dilts Lashley, Kisha |
author |
Lashley, Kisha |
author_sort |
Lashley, Kisha |
title |
THE EFFECTS OF UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION PRACTICES ON LICENSING INCOME - A COMPARATIVE STUDY |
title_short |
THE EFFECTS OF UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION PRACTICES ON LICENSING INCOME - A COMPARATIVE STUDY |
title_full |
THE EFFECTS OF UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION PRACTICES ON LICENSING INCOME - A COMPARATIVE STUDY |
title_fullStr |
THE EFFECTS OF UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION PRACTICES ON LICENSING INCOME - A COMPARATIVE STUDY |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE EFFECTS OF UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION PRACTICES ON LICENSING INCOME - A COMPARATIVE STUDY |
title_sort |
effects of university technology commercialization practices on licensing income - a comparative study |
publisher |
VANDERBILT |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07212004-120013/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lashleykisha theeffectsofuniversitytechnologycommercializationpracticesonlicensingincomeacomparativestudy AT lashleykisha effectsofuniversitytechnologycommercializationpracticesonlicensingincomeacomparativestudy |
_version_ |
1716533103143419904 |