Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma
Traditionally, liberalism has been committed to the rights and freedoms of individuals. Recently, that idea has been challenged by the multiculturalist notion that, in some instances, group-based claims must be addressed to fully accommodate the freedom of individuals. This project addresses directl...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
VANDERBILT
2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07122007-194708/ |
id |
ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-07122007-194708 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-07122007-1947082013-01-08T17:16:15Z Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma Crites, Joshua Seth Philosophy Traditionally, liberalism has been committed to the rights and freedoms of individuals. Recently, that idea has been challenged by the multiculturalist notion that, in some instances, group-based claims must be addressed to fully accommodate the freedom of individuals. This project addresses directly the question of whether liberals can countenance group-based claims and, if they can, whether they should. To this end, I examine four approaches to the question of whether liberals can be multiculturalists. These responses are the best examples of how liberals respond to group-based claims, spanning from a position that argues that liberalism entails multiculturalism to an outright dismissal of any multiculturalist accommodation of group-based claims. I argue that, in the end, there are really only two viable positions: either the liberal must reject multiculturalism in order to retain basic liberal principles or liberalism must be revised in order to address those aspects of multiculturalism which are legitimate. Neither option is fully satisfactory. I conclude that deciding which option is preferable depends on what costs the liberal is willing to bear. Robert B. Talisse Jonathan Neufeld William James Booth Henry Teloh Chandran Kukathas VANDERBILT 2007-07-25 text application/pdf http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07122007-194708/ http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07122007-194708/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Philosophy |
spellingShingle |
Philosophy Crites, Joshua Seth Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma |
description |
Traditionally, liberalism has been committed to the rights and freedoms of individuals. Recently, that idea has been challenged by the multiculturalist notion that, in some instances, group-based claims must be addressed to fully accommodate the freedom of individuals. This project addresses directly the question of whether liberals can countenance group-based claims and, if they can, whether they should. To this end, I examine four approaches to the question of whether liberals can be multiculturalists. These responses are the best examples of how liberals respond to group-based claims, spanning from a position that argues that liberalism entails multiculturalism to an outright dismissal of any multiculturalist accommodation of group-based claims. I argue that, in the end, there are really only two viable positions: either the liberal must reject multiculturalism in order to retain basic liberal principles or liberalism must be revised in order to address those aspects of multiculturalism which are legitimate. Neither option is fully satisfactory. I conclude that deciding which option is preferable depends on what costs the liberal is willing to bear. |
author2 |
Robert B. Talisse |
author_facet |
Robert B. Talisse Crites, Joshua Seth |
author |
Crites, Joshua Seth |
author_sort |
Crites, Joshua Seth |
title |
Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma |
title_short |
Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma |
title_full |
Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma |
title_fullStr |
Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma |
title_full_unstemmed |
Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma |
title_sort |
liberalism and multiculturalism: a philosophical dilemma |
publisher |
VANDERBILT |
publishDate |
2007 |
url |
http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07122007-194708/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT critesjoshuaseth liberalismandmulticulturalismaphilosophicaldilemma |
_version_ |
1716533205771747328 |