Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma

Traditionally, liberalism has been committed to the rights and freedoms of individuals. Recently, that idea has been challenged by the multiculturalist notion that, in some instances, group-based claims must be addressed to fully accommodate the freedom of individuals. This project addresses directl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Crites, Joshua Seth
Other Authors: Robert B. Talisse
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: VANDERBILT 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07122007-194708/
id ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-07122007-194708
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-07122007-1947082013-01-08T17:16:15Z Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma Crites, Joshua Seth Philosophy Traditionally, liberalism has been committed to the rights and freedoms of individuals. Recently, that idea has been challenged by the multiculturalist notion that, in some instances, group-based claims must be addressed to fully accommodate the freedom of individuals. This project addresses directly the question of whether liberals can countenance group-based claims and, if they can, whether they should. To this end, I examine four approaches to the question of whether liberals can be multiculturalists. These responses are the best examples of how liberals respond to group-based claims, spanning from a position that argues that liberalism entails multiculturalism to an outright dismissal of any multiculturalist accommodation of group-based claims. I argue that, in the end, there are really only two viable positions: either the liberal must reject multiculturalism in order to retain basic liberal principles or liberalism must be revised in order to address those aspects of multiculturalism which are legitimate. Neither option is fully satisfactory. I conclude that deciding which option is preferable depends on what costs the liberal is willing to bear. Robert B. Talisse Jonathan Neufeld William James Booth Henry Teloh Chandran Kukathas VANDERBILT 2007-07-25 text application/pdf http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07122007-194708/ http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07122007-194708/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Philosophy
spellingShingle Philosophy
Crites, Joshua Seth
Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma
description Traditionally, liberalism has been committed to the rights and freedoms of individuals. Recently, that idea has been challenged by the multiculturalist notion that, in some instances, group-based claims must be addressed to fully accommodate the freedom of individuals. This project addresses directly the question of whether liberals can countenance group-based claims and, if they can, whether they should. To this end, I examine four approaches to the question of whether liberals can be multiculturalists. These responses are the best examples of how liberals respond to group-based claims, spanning from a position that argues that liberalism entails multiculturalism to an outright dismissal of any multiculturalist accommodation of group-based claims. I argue that, in the end, there are really only two viable positions: either the liberal must reject multiculturalism in order to retain basic liberal principles or liberalism must be revised in order to address those aspects of multiculturalism which are legitimate. Neither option is fully satisfactory. I conclude that deciding which option is preferable depends on what costs the liberal is willing to bear.
author2 Robert B. Talisse
author_facet Robert B. Talisse
Crites, Joshua Seth
author Crites, Joshua Seth
author_sort Crites, Joshua Seth
title Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma
title_short Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma
title_full Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma
title_fullStr Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma
title_full_unstemmed Liberalism and Multiculturalism: A Philosophical Dilemma
title_sort liberalism and multiculturalism: a philosophical dilemma
publisher VANDERBILT
publishDate 2007
url http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-07122007-194708/
work_keys_str_mv AT critesjoshuaseth liberalismandmulticulturalismaphilosophicaldilemma
_version_ 1716533205771747328