"It's Not Me, It's You": How Americans' Animosity Toward Their Opponents Drives Modern Politics
This dissertation examines the ways in which the increasingly negative feelings that Americans harbor toward their political opponents influence the way they understand politics. Though the conventional understanding of partisanship suggests that people orient themselves to politics through their co...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
VANDERBILT
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-06302017-132238/ |
id |
ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-06302017-132238 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-06302017-1322382017-07-11T06:01:38Z "It's Not Me, It's You": How Americans' Animosity Toward Their Opponents Drives Modern Politics Roush, Carolyn Elizabeth Political Science This dissertation examines the ways in which the increasingly negative feelings that Americans harbor toward their political opponents influence the way they understand politics. Though the conventional understanding of partisanship suggests that people orient themselves to politics through their connection to their own party, I demonstrate that modern partisanship works primarily through the negativity partisans feel toward their opponents. In a polarized political environment, peopleâs self-reported strength of partisanship or positive feelings toward their own party do little to explain their attitudes. This is a new development in American public opinion: previously, peopleâs issue and ideological preferences were influenced in equal measure by their warm feelings toward their own party and their dislike of the opposition. Since 2000, however, the dislike that partisans feel toward their opponents dominates these attitudes. Out-party hostility also appears to be a driving force behind biased information processing. I find that partisans unquestioningly accept unverified, often salacious political rumors as truth simply because they dislike their opponents. These negative out-party feelings also play an important role in inoculating partisans against believing rumors that paint themselves and their allies in a poor light. Out-party negativity, therefore, may be at least partially responsible for the breakdown of political dialogue in the United States. Finally, while negative out-party feelings may lead to normatively troubling outcomes, they also appear to play a beneficial role in promoting democratic values. Partisans who intensely dislike their opponents are more likely to attach importance to specific civil liberties or democratic norms than those who feel neutrally or even positively toward the other side. In this way, out-party negativity plays a vital role in promoting democratic attitudes during a time in which Americans express a growing openness to authoritarian interpretations of democracy. Taken together, this research suggests a need to revisit the conventional understanding of partisanship as a social identity: partisans now use their hostility toward the other side as a heuristic to guide them through the political world. Larry M. Bartels Marc J. Hetherington Joshua D. Clinton John G. Geer Thomas J. Rudolph VANDERBILT 2017-07-10 text application/pdf http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-06302017-132238/ http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-06302017-132238/ en restricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Political Science |
spellingShingle |
Political Science Roush, Carolyn Elizabeth "It's Not Me, It's You": How Americans' Animosity Toward Their Opponents Drives Modern Politics |
description |
This dissertation examines the ways in which the increasingly negative feelings that Americans harbor toward their political opponents influence the way they understand politics. Though the conventional understanding of partisanship suggests that people orient themselves to politics through their connection to their own party, I demonstrate that modern partisanship works primarily through the negativity partisans feel toward their opponents. In a polarized political environment, peopleâs self-reported strength of partisanship or positive feelings toward their own party do little to explain their attitudes. This is a new development in American public opinion: previously, peopleâs issue and ideological preferences were influenced in equal measure by their warm feelings toward their own party and their dislike of the opposition. Since 2000, however, the dislike that partisans feel toward their opponents dominates these attitudes. Out-party hostility also appears to be a driving force behind biased information processing. I find that partisans unquestioningly accept unverified, often salacious political rumors as truth simply because they dislike their opponents. These negative out-party feelings also play an important role in inoculating partisans against believing rumors that paint themselves and their allies in a poor light. Out-party negativity, therefore, may be at least partially responsible for the breakdown of political dialogue in the United States. Finally, while negative out-party feelings may lead to normatively troubling outcomes, they also appear to play a beneficial role in promoting democratic values. Partisans who intensely dislike their opponents are more likely to attach importance to specific civil liberties or democratic norms than those who feel neutrally or even positively toward the other side. In this way, out-party negativity plays a vital role in promoting democratic attitudes during a time in which Americans express a growing openness to authoritarian interpretations of democracy. Taken together, this research suggests a need to revisit the conventional understanding of partisanship as a social identity: partisans now use their hostility toward the other side as a heuristic to guide them through the political world. |
author2 |
Larry M. Bartels |
author_facet |
Larry M. Bartels Roush, Carolyn Elizabeth |
author |
Roush, Carolyn Elizabeth |
author_sort |
Roush, Carolyn Elizabeth |
title |
"It's Not Me, It's You": How Americans' Animosity Toward Their Opponents Drives Modern Politics |
title_short |
"It's Not Me, It's You": How Americans' Animosity Toward Their Opponents Drives Modern Politics |
title_full |
"It's Not Me, It's You": How Americans' Animosity Toward Their Opponents Drives Modern Politics |
title_fullStr |
"It's Not Me, It's You": How Americans' Animosity Toward Their Opponents Drives Modern Politics |
title_full_unstemmed |
"It's Not Me, It's You": How Americans' Animosity Toward Their Opponents Drives Modern Politics |
title_sort |
"it's not me, it's you": how americans' animosity toward their opponents drives modern politics |
publisher |
VANDERBILT |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-06302017-132238/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT roushcarolynelizabeth itsnotmeitsyouhowamericansanimositytowardtheiropponentsdrivesmodernpolitics |
_version_ |
1718495712433405952 |