Shale Development: Risks, Responses, and Regulation

Advances in horizontal drilling and high-volume hydraulic fracturing have allowed operators to profit from oil and gas extracted from the extensive shale formations found in the United States. The resulting boom in shale development has exposed many areas, including heavily populated and environment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cecot, Caroline
Other Authors: Dana Nelson
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: VANDERBILT 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-04032014-064840/
id ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-04032014-064840
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-04032014-0648402014-04-27T05:04:00Z Shale Development: Risks, Responses, and Regulation Cecot, Caroline Law and Economics Advances in horizontal drilling and high-volume hydraulic fracturing have allowed operators to profit from oil and gas extracted from the extensive shale formations found in the United States. The resulting boom in shale development has exposed many areas, including heavily populated and environmentally sensitive areas, to the common as well as to the uncertain risks associated with drilling activities. This dissertation empirically analyzes responses to perceived risks of shale development as revealed through property transactions in a Pennsylvania county and through legislative decisions by New York towns. In general, I find that perceived risks to water feature prominently in both contexts. In Chapter I, I find that an additional nearby horizontal well increases property values on average, but that this positive effect is diminished for properties that rely on private wells for drinking water. Chapter II then considers when towns adopt a ban on shale development. In particular, I find that greater reliance on private water wells is associated with a higher probability of adopting a ban. Finally, in Chapter III, I discuss how governments could use regulations, tort liability, and insurance mandates to better manage risks to water, thereby possibly preventing property-value losses and outright bans. Dana Nelson J.B. Ruhl Joni Hersch W. Kip Viscusi VANDERBILT 2014-04-26 text application/pdf http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-04032014-064840/ http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-04032014-064840/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Law and Economics
spellingShingle Law and Economics
Cecot, Caroline
Shale Development: Risks, Responses, and Regulation
description Advances in horizontal drilling and high-volume hydraulic fracturing have allowed operators to profit from oil and gas extracted from the extensive shale formations found in the United States. The resulting boom in shale development has exposed many areas, including heavily populated and environmentally sensitive areas, to the common as well as to the uncertain risks associated with drilling activities. This dissertation empirically analyzes responses to perceived risks of shale development as revealed through property transactions in a Pennsylvania county and through legislative decisions by New York towns. In general, I find that perceived risks to water feature prominently in both contexts. In Chapter I, I find that an additional nearby horizontal well increases property values on average, but that this positive effect is diminished for properties that rely on private wells for drinking water. Chapter II then considers when towns adopt a ban on shale development. In particular, I find that greater reliance on private water wells is associated with a higher probability of adopting a ban. Finally, in Chapter III, I discuss how governments could use regulations, tort liability, and insurance mandates to better manage risks to water, thereby possibly preventing property-value losses and outright bans.
author2 Dana Nelson
author_facet Dana Nelson
Cecot, Caroline
author Cecot, Caroline
author_sort Cecot, Caroline
title Shale Development: Risks, Responses, and Regulation
title_short Shale Development: Risks, Responses, and Regulation
title_full Shale Development: Risks, Responses, and Regulation
title_fullStr Shale Development: Risks, Responses, and Regulation
title_full_unstemmed Shale Development: Risks, Responses, and Regulation
title_sort shale development: risks, responses, and regulation
publisher VANDERBILT
publishDate 2014
url http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-04032014-064840/
work_keys_str_mv AT cecotcaroline shaledevelopmentrisksresponsesandregulation
_version_ 1716666516632502272