Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins
The replication stress response (RSR) maintains genome stability and promotes the accurate duplication of the genome. ssDNA binding proteins are integral components of the RSR and have been extensively studied for years. However, the mechanisms by which they specifically direct enzymes to the right...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
VANDERBILT
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-02252018-145104/ |
id |
ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-02252018-145104 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-02252018-1451042018-02-27T05:14:30Z Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins Bhat, Kamakoti Prakash Biochemistry The replication stress response (RSR) maintains genome stability and promotes the accurate duplication of the genome. ssDNA binding proteins are integral components of the RSR and have been extensively studied for years. However, the mechanisms by which they specifically direct enzymes to the right substrates and how they regulate replication fork remodeling is less well understood. My thesis projects have focused on the regulation of fork remodeling pathways by ssDNA binding proteins. In Chapter III, I discovered how RPA enforces SMARCAL1 substrate specificity to promote appropriate fork reversal. In chapter IV, I identified a new RPA-like ssDNA binding protein, RADX, at replication forks. I characterized the function of RADX as a negative regulator of RAD51 mediated fork reversal and described RADX loss as a chemo-resistance mechanism in BRCA2-deficient U2OS cells. In chapter V, I further explored the mechanisms by which RADX regulates RAD51. Utilizing RADX as a tool, I interrogated RAD51 functions in different pathways of fork protection and discovered the differential requirements of RAD51 in fork reversal and fork protection. Overall, my thesis has made significant contributions to our understanding of the processes of fork reversal and fork protection and has identified a potential chemo-resistance mechanism for BRCA2-mutant cancers. David Cortez Scott Heibert Brandt Eichman William Tansey Walter Chazin VANDERBILT 2018-02-26 text application/pdf http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-02252018-145104/ http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-02252018-145104/ en restricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Biochemistry |
spellingShingle |
Biochemistry Bhat, Kamakoti Prakash Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins |
description |
The replication stress response (RSR) maintains genome stability and promotes the accurate duplication of the genome. ssDNA binding proteins are integral components of the RSR and have been extensively studied for years. However, the mechanisms by which they specifically direct enzymes to the right substrates and how they regulate replication fork remodeling is less well understood. My thesis projects have focused on the regulation of fork remodeling pathways by ssDNA binding proteins. In Chapter III, I discovered how RPA enforces SMARCAL1 substrate specificity to promote appropriate fork reversal. In chapter IV, I identified a new RPA-like ssDNA binding protein, RADX, at replication forks. I characterized the function of RADX as a negative regulator of RAD51 mediated fork reversal and described RADX loss as a chemo-resistance mechanism in BRCA2-deficient U2OS cells. In chapter V, I further explored the mechanisms by which RADX regulates RAD51. Utilizing RADX as a tool, I interrogated RAD51 functions in different pathways of fork protection and discovered the differential requirements of RAD51 in fork reversal and fork protection. Overall, my thesis has made significant contributions to our understanding of the processes of fork reversal and fork protection and has identified a potential chemo-resistance mechanism for BRCA2-mutant cancers. |
author2 |
David Cortez |
author_facet |
David Cortez Bhat, Kamakoti Prakash |
author |
Bhat, Kamakoti Prakash |
author_sort |
Bhat, Kamakoti Prakash |
title |
Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins |
title_short |
Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins |
title_full |
Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins |
title_fullStr |
Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins |
title_full_unstemmed |
Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins |
title_sort |
regulation of replication fork stability by ssdna binding proteins |
publisher |
VANDERBILT |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-02252018-145104/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bhatkamakotiprakash regulationofreplicationforkstabilitybyssdnabindingproteins |
_version_ |
1718615106552594432 |