Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins

The replication stress response (RSR) maintains genome stability and promotes the accurate duplication of the genome. ssDNA binding proteins are integral components of the RSR and have been extensively studied for years. However, the mechanisms by which they specifically direct enzymes to the right...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bhat, Kamakoti Prakash
Other Authors: David Cortez
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: VANDERBILT 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-02252018-145104/
id ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-02252018-145104
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-VANDERBILT-oai-VANDERBILTETD-etd-02252018-1451042018-02-27T05:14:30Z Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins Bhat, Kamakoti Prakash Biochemistry The replication stress response (RSR) maintains genome stability and promotes the accurate duplication of the genome. ssDNA binding proteins are integral components of the RSR and have been extensively studied for years. However, the mechanisms by which they specifically direct enzymes to the right substrates and how they regulate replication fork remodeling is less well understood. My thesis projects have focused on the regulation of fork remodeling pathways by ssDNA binding proteins. In Chapter III, I discovered how RPA enforces SMARCAL1 substrate specificity to promote appropriate fork reversal. In chapter IV, I identified a new RPA-like ssDNA binding protein, RADX, at replication forks. I characterized the function of RADX as a negative regulator of RAD51 mediated fork reversal and described RADX loss as a chemo-resistance mechanism in BRCA2-deficient U2OS cells. In chapter V, I further explored the mechanisms by which RADX regulates RAD51. Utilizing RADX as a tool, I interrogated RAD51 functions in different pathways of fork protection and discovered the differential requirements of RAD51 in fork reversal and fork protection. Overall, my thesis has made significant contributions to our understanding of the processes of fork reversal and fork protection and has identified a potential chemo-resistance mechanism for BRCA2-mutant cancers. David Cortez Scott Heibert Brandt Eichman William Tansey Walter Chazin VANDERBILT 2018-02-26 text application/pdf http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-02252018-145104/ http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-02252018-145104/ en restricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to Vanderbilt University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Biochemistry
spellingShingle Biochemistry
Bhat, Kamakoti Prakash
Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins
description The replication stress response (RSR) maintains genome stability and promotes the accurate duplication of the genome. ssDNA binding proteins are integral components of the RSR and have been extensively studied for years. However, the mechanisms by which they specifically direct enzymes to the right substrates and how they regulate replication fork remodeling is less well understood. My thesis projects have focused on the regulation of fork remodeling pathways by ssDNA binding proteins. In Chapter III, I discovered how RPA enforces SMARCAL1 substrate specificity to promote appropriate fork reversal. In chapter IV, I identified a new RPA-like ssDNA binding protein, RADX, at replication forks. I characterized the function of RADX as a negative regulator of RAD51 mediated fork reversal and described RADX loss as a chemo-resistance mechanism in BRCA2-deficient U2OS cells. In chapter V, I further explored the mechanisms by which RADX regulates RAD51. Utilizing RADX as a tool, I interrogated RAD51 functions in different pathways of fork protection and discovered the differential requirements of RAD51 in fork reversal and fork protection. Overall, my thesis has made significant contributions to our understanding of the processes of fork reversal and fork protection and has identified a potential chemo-resistance mechanism for BRCA2-mutant cancers.
author2 David Cortez
author_facet David Cortez
Bhat, Kamakoti Prakash
author Bhat, Kamakoti Prakash
author_sort Bhat, Kamakoti Prakash
title Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins
title_short Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins
title_full Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins
title_fullStr Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins
title_full_unstemmed Regulation of replication fork stability by ssDNA binding proteins
title_sort regulation of replication fork stability by ssdna binding proteins
publisher VANDERBILT
publishDate 2018
url http://etd.library.vanderbilt.edu/available/etd-02252018-145104/
work_keys_str_mv AT bhatkamakotiprakash regulationofreplicationforkstabilitybyssdnabindingproteins
_version_ 1718615106552594432