The domestic consequences of hierarchy in international relations

Recent explorations of hierarchy in international relations have restricted their domain of inquiry to states as aggregate units. Although this has greatly enhanced our understanding of international politics, we know less about what the implications of hierarchy are for domestic politics in subordi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McCormack, Daniel Mark
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2012-05-5812
id ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-ETD-UT-2012-05-5812
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-ETD-UT-2012-05-58122015-09-20T17:09:03ZThe domestic consequences of hierarchy in international relationsMcCormack, Daniel MarkInternational relationsHierarchyRegime changeBargainingRecent explorations of hierarchy in international relations have restricted their domain of inquiry to states as aggregate units. Although this has greatly enhanced our understanding of international politics, we know less about what the implications of hierarchy are for domestic politics in subordinate states. Because of the varieties of domestic political control - including violence - employed by great powers, opening up the black box of subordinate state politics can yield new insights into the operations and limits of international hierarchy. Here I outline a theory of political incentivization and link it to a discussion of foreign-imposed regime change, arguing that great powers stabilize politics in subordinate states directly by bolstering preferred regimes and indirectly by threatening to intervene and remove leaders who challenge the status quo.text2012-08-14T17:54:25Z2012-08-14T17:54:25Z2012-052012-08-14May 20122012-08-14T17:54:30Zthesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2012-05-58122152/ETD-UT-2012-05-5812eng
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic International relations
Hierarchy
Regime change
Bargaining
spellingShingle International relations
Hierarchy
Regime change
Bargaining
McCormack, Daniel Mark
The domestic consequences of hierarchy in international relations
description Recent explorations of hierarchy in international relations have restricted their domain of inquiry to states as aggregate units. Although this has greatly enhanced our understanding of international politics, we know less about what the implications of hierarchy are for domestic politics in subordinate states. Because of the varieties of domestic political control - including violence - employed by great powers, opening up the black box of subordinate state politics can yield new insights into the operations and limits of international hierarchy. Here I outline a theory of political incentivization and link it to a discussion of foreign-imposed regime change, arguing that great powers stabilize politics in subordinate states directly by bolstering preferred regimes and indirectly by threatening to intervene and remove leaders who challenge the status quo. === text
author McCormack, Daniel Mark
author_facet McCormack, Daniel Mark
author_sort McCormack, Daniel Mark
title The domestic consequences of hierarchy in international relations
title_short The domestic consequences of hierarchy in international relations
title_full The domestic consequences of hierarchy in international relations
title_fullStr The domestic consequences of hierarchy in international relations
title_full_unstemmed The domestic consequences of hierarchy in international relations
title_sort domestic consequences of hierarchy in international relations
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2012-05-5812
work_keys_str_mv AT mccormackdanielmark thedomesticconsequencesofhierarchyininternationalrelations
AT mccormackdanielmark domesticconsequencesofhierarchyininternationalrelations
_version_ 1716822858663985152