Parent experience of traditional versus collaborative child assessment

Collaborative child assessment combines traditional assessment methods with techniques aimed at increasing the therapeutic benefit of assessment for children and parents. Previous studies have found high consumer satisfaction, increased self esteem, decreased symptomatic distress, and greater hopef...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matson, May Fraser
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2011-05-3415
id ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-ETD-UT-2011-05-3415
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-ETD-UT-2011-05-34152015-09-20T16:59:40ZParent experience of traditional versus collaborative child assessmentMatson, May FraserCollaborative assessmentTherapeutic assessmentPsychological assessmentsChild psychologyCollaborative child assessment combines traditional assessment methods with techniques aimed at increasing the therapeutic benefit of assessment for children and parents. Previous studies have found high consumer satisfaction, increased self esteem, decreased symptomatic distress, and greater hopefulness following participation in collaborative assessment. However, full collaborative assessment protocols are complex, time-consuming, and thus not practical to use in many applied settings. This study investigated the practicality and potential benefits of implementing several collaborative techniques into otherwise traditional child assessments, including co-generation of assessment questions, use of a process orientation during child testing, and use of an individualized, level-based approach when providing feedback. It was hypothesized that, compared to parents participating in traditional assessments, parents participating in collaborative assessments would report greater satisfaction, greater collaboration, learning more about their child, stronger alliance with the assessor, more positive feelings about the assessment process, and more hopefulness about their child’s challenges and future. Univariate analysis of variance statistics were used to test these hypotheses, which were not statistically supported, in part due to the limited sample size obtained. However, group differences of small to moderate effect sizes were seen for most of the outcome variables, including parent-reported learning about their child, assessor-parent relationship, assessor-child relationship, collaboration, negative feelings about the assessment, general satisfaction, and negative emotions about their child’s future. The results suggest that further research in this area is warranted. Limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are discussed.text2011-06-08T14:46:39Z2011-06-08T14:46:47Z2011-06-08T14:46:39Z2011-06-08T14:46:47Z2011-052011-06-08May 20112011-06-08T14:46:47Zthesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2011-05-3415eng
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Collaborative assessment
Therapeutic assessment
Psychological assessments
Child psychology
spellingShingle Collaborative assessment
Therapeutic assessment
Psychological assessments
Child psychology
Matson, May Fraser
Parent experience of traditional versus collaborative child assessment
description Collaborative child assessment combines traditional assessment methods with techniques aimed at increasing the therapeutic benefit of assessment for children and parents. Previous studies have found high consumer satisfaction, increased self esteem, decreased symptomatic distress, and greater hopefulness following participation in collaborative assessment. However, full collaborative assessment protocols are complex, time-consuming, and thus not practical to use in many applied settings. This study investigated the practicality and potential benefits of implementing several collaborative techniques into otherwise traditional child assessments, including co-generation of assessment questions, use of a process orientation during child testing, and use of an individualized, level-based approach when providing feedback. It was hypothesized that, compared to parents participating in traditional assessments, parents participating in collaborative assessments would report greater satisfaction, greater collaboration, learning more about their child, stronger alliance with the assessor, more positive feelings about the assessment process, and more hopefulness about their child’s challenges and future. Univariate analysis of variance statistics were used to test these hypotheses, which were not statistically supported, in part due to the limited sample size obtained. However, group differences of small to moderate effect sizes were seen for most of the outcome variables, including parent-reported learning about their child, assessor-parent relationship, assessor-child relationship, collaboration, negative feelings about the assessment, general satisfaction, and negative emotions about their child’s future. The results suggest that further research in this area is warranted. Limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are discussed. === text
author Matson, May Fraser
author_facet Matson, May Fraser
author_sort Matson, May Fraser
title Parent experience of traditional versus collaborative child assessment
title_short Parent experience of traditional versus collaborative child assessment
title_full Parent experience of traditional versus collaborative child assessment
title_fullStr Parent experience of traditional versus collaborative child assessment
title_full_unstemmed Parent experience of traditional versus collaborative child assessment
title_sort parent experience of traditional versus collaborative child assessment
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2011-05-3415
work_keys_str_mv AT matsonmayfraser parentexperienceoftraditionalversuscollaborativechildassessment
_version_ 1716821707350605824