A frame-semantic analysis of five English verbs evoking the Theft frame

An important problem in lexical semantics is the explanation of how verbal meaning interacts with the syntactic realization of arguments. Levin (1993) recognizes the relation between syntax and semantics in her classification of English verbs, in which similar syntactic behavior among verbs is assum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dux, Ryan Joseph
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2011-05-3114
id ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-ETD-UT-2011-05-3114
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-ETD-UT-2011-05-31142015-09-20T17:01:52ZA frame-semantic analysis of five English verbs evoking the Theft frameDux, Ryan JosephLinguisticsSyntaxSemanticsFrame semanticsVerb descriptivityAn important problem in lexical semantics is the explanation of how verbal meaning interacts with the syntactic realization of arguments. Levin (1993) recognizes the relation between syntax and semantics in her classification of English verbs, in which similar syntactic behavior among verbs is assumed to reflect shared meaning components. However, her classes do not accurately predict the verbs’ semantic and syntactic properties. Other researchers (Taylor 1996, Boas 2008) argue for the inclusion of detailed encyclopedic meaning in explanations of syntactic behavior. Frame Semantics provides the necessary tools for fine-grained analyses of the syntax-semantics interface because it offers a rigorous method for the description of meaning and documents syntactic information about argument realization from corpus data. This report uses concepts from Frame Semantics and data from its practical application, FrameNet (http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu), to assess the importance of fine-grained verbal meaning for argument realization by comparing the verbs embezzle, pilfer, shoplift, snatch and steal. Each verb construes the general semantics of the Theft frame differently, emphasizing or specifying individual participants in the event (frame elements). They also exhibit subtle differences in whether and how these frame elements are syntactically realized. In linking their syntax to their semantics, I show that the verbs’ syntactic distribution may be influenced by aspects of meaning such as their degree of descriptivity, the detailed specification of certain frame elements, and their occurrence as LUs in different frames.text2011-07-22T21:38:57Z2011-07-22T21:38:57Z2011-052011-07-22May 20112011-07-22T21:39:06Zthesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2011-05-31142152/ETD-UT-2011-05-3114eng
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Linguistics
Syntax
Semantics
Frame semantics
Verb descriptivity
spellingShingle Linguistics
Syntax
Semantics
Frame semantics
Verb descriptivity
Dux, Ryan Joseph
A frame-semantic analysis of five English verbs evoking the Theft frame
description An important problem in lexical semantics is the explanation of how verbal meaning interacts with the syntactic realization of arguments. Levin (1993) recognizes the relation between syntax and semantics in her classification of English verbs, in which similar syntactic behavior among verbs is assumed to reflect shared meaning components. However, her classes do not accurately predict the verbs’ semantic and syntactic properties. Other researchers (Taylor 1996, Boas 2008) argue for the inclusion of detailed encyclopedic meaning in explanations of syntactic behavior. Frame Semantics provides the necessary tools for fine-grained analyses of the syntax-semantics interface because it offers a rigorous method for the description of meaning and documents syntactic information about argument realization from corpus data. This report uses concepts from Frame Semantics and data from its practical application, FrameNet (http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu), to assess the importance of fine-grained verbal meaning for argument realization by comparing the verbs embezzle, pilfer, shoplift, snatch and steal. Each verb construes the general semantics of the Theft frame differently, emphasizing or specifying individual participants in the event (frame elements). They also exhibit subtle differences in whether and how these frame elements are syntactically realized. In linking their syntax to their semantics, I show that the verbs’ syntactic distribution may be influenced by aspects of meaning such as their degree of descriptivity, the detailed specification of certain frame elements, and their occurrence as LUs in different frames. === text
author Dux, Ryan Joseph
author_facet Dux, Ryan Joseph
author_sort Dux, Ryan Joseph
title A frame-semantic analysis of five English verbs evoking the Theft frame
title_short A frame-semantic analysis of five English verbs evoking the Theft frame
title_full A frame-semantic analysis of five English verbs evoking the Theft frame
title_fullStr A frame-semantic analysis of five English verbs evoking the Theft frame
title_full_unstemmed A frame-semantic analysis of five English verbs evoking the Theft frame
title_sort frame-semantic analysis of five english verbs evoking the theft frame
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2011-05-3114
work_keys_str_mv AT duxryanjoseph aframesemanticanalysisoffiveenglishverbsevokingthetheftframe
AT duxryanjoseph framesemanticanalysisoffiveenglishverbsevokingthetheftframe
_version_ 1716821964035719168