Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after
Anscombe (1964) presents influential arguments that 'before' and 'after' cannot denote converse relations, despite intuitions to the contrary. These arguments, I claim, rely on ambiguity of certain 'before'- and 'after'-sentences, ambiguity that arises from t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2152/26424 |
id |
ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-26424 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-264242015-09-20T17:26:49ZTense, aspect and temporal order : before and afterCope, Justin LynnTemporal semanticsBefore and afterTenseAspectCoercionDiscourse representation theoryAnscombe (1964) presents influential arguments that 'before' and 'after' cannot denote converse relations, despite intuitions to the contrary. These arguments, I claim, rely on ambiguity of certain 'before'- and 'after'-sentences, ambiguity that arises from the interaction of tense and aspect with the temporal ordering relations denoted by 'before' and 'after'. To account for this ambiguity, I adopt a Discourse Representation Theory-based analysis of tense and aspect (Kamp & Reyle 2011) and apply it to a set of examples that exhibit the variety of readings available for 'before'- and 'after'-sentences. I argue that certain readings of stative 'after'-sentences support the existence of an inceptive coercion operator, equivalent in effect to the aspectual verb 'begin'. This operator has much in common with 'earliest', an operator proposed by Beaver & Condoravdi (2003), but it is motivated by independent aspectual considerations. I conclude with a discussion of areas for future research.text2014-10-09T21:01:49Z2014-052014-07-24May 20142014-10-09T21:01:49ZThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/26424en |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Temporal semantics Before and after Tense Aspect Coercion Discourse representation theory |
spellingShingle |
Temporal semantics Before and after Tense Aspect Coercion Discourse representation theory Cope, Justin Lynn Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after |
description |
Anscombe (1964) presents influential arguments that 'before' and 'after' cannot denote converse relations, despite intuitions to the contrary. These arguments, I claim, rely on ambiguity of certain 'before'- and 'after'-sentences, ambiguity that arises from the interaction of tense and aspect with the temporal ordering relations denoted by 'before' and 'after'. To account for this ambiguity, I adopt a Discourse Representation Theory-based analysis of tense and aspect (Kamp & Reyle 2011) and apply it to a set of examples that exhibit the variety of readings available for 'before'- and 'after'-sentences. I argue that certain readings of stative 'after'-sentences support the existence of an inceptive coercion operator, equivalent in effect to the aspectual verb 'begin'. This operator has much in common with 'earliest', an operator proposed by Beaver & Condoravdi (2003), but it is motivated by independent aspectual considerations. I conclude with a discussion of areas for future research. === text |
author |
Cope, Justin Lynn |
author_facet |
Cope, Justin Lynn |
author_sort |
Cope, Justin Lynn |
title |
Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after |
title_short |
Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after |
title_full |
Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after |
title_fullStr |
Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after |
title_sort |
tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2152/26424 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT copejustinlynn tenseaspectandtemporalorderbeforeandafter |
_version_ |
1716824040248705024 |