Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after

Anscombe (1964) presents influential arguments that 'before' and 'after' cannot denote converse relations, despite intuitions to the contrary. These arguments, I claim, rely on ambiguity of certain 'before'- and 'after'-sentences, ambiguity that arises from t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cope, Justin Lynn
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2152/26424
id ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-26424
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-264242015-09-20T17:26:49ZTense, aspect and temporal order : before and afterCope, Justin LynnTemporal semanticsBefore and afterTenseAspectCoercionDiscourse representation theoryAnscombe (1964) presents influential arguments that 'before' and 'after' cannot denote converse relations, despite intuitions to the contrary. These arguments, I claim, rely on ambiguity of certain 'before'- and 'after'-sentences, ambiguity that arises from the interaction of tense and aspect with the temporal ordering relations denoted by 'before' and 'after'. To account for this ambiguity, I adopt a Discourse Representation Theory-based analysis of tense and aspect (Kamp & Reyle 2011) and apply it to a set of examples that exhibit the variety of readings available for 'before'- and 'after'-sentences. I argue that certain readings of stative 'after'-sentences support the existence of an inceptive coercion operator, equivalent in effect to the aspectual verb 'begin'. This operator has much in common with 'earliest', an operator proposed by Beaver & Condoravdi (2003), but it is motivated by independent aspectual considerations. I conclude with a discussion of areas for future research.text2014-10-09T21:01:49Z2014-052014-07-24May 20142014-10-09T21:01:49ZThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/26424en
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Temporal semantics
Before and after
Tense
Aspect
Coercion
Discourse representation theory
spellingShingle Temporal semantics
Before and after
Tense
Aspect
Coercion
Discourse representation theory
Cope, Justin Lynn
Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after
description Anscombe (1964) presents influential arguments that 'before' and 'after' cannot denote converse relations, despite intuitions to the contrary. These arguments, I claim, rely on ambiguity of certain 'before'- and 'after'-sentences, ambiguity that arises from the interaction of tense and aspect with the temporal ordering relations denoted by 'before' and 'after'. To account for this ambiguity, I adopt a Discourse Representation Theory-based analysis of tense and aspect (Kamp & Reyle 2011) and apply it to a set of examples that exhibit the variety of readings available for 'before'- and 'after'-sentences. I argue that certain readings of stative 'after'-sentences support the existence of an inceptive coercion operator, equivalent in effect to the aspectual verb 'begin'. This operator has much in common with 'earliest', an operator proposed by Beaver & Condoravdi (2003), but it is motivated by independent aspectual considerations. I conclude with a discussion of areas for future research. === text
author Cope, Justin Lynn
author_facet Cope, Justin Lynn
author_sort Cope, Justin Lynn
title Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after
title_short Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after
title_full Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after
title_fullStr Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after
title_full_unstemmed Tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after
title_sort tense, aspect and temporal order : before and after
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/2152/26424
work_keys_str_mv AT copejustinlynn tenseaspectandtemporalorderbeforeandafter
_version_ 1716824040248705024