Analysis of dredge materials and crushed glass blends with uniaxial geogrids in pullout tests

Being able to identify blended dredged material and crushed glass of different proportions as materials suitable for Mechanically Stabilized Earth walls could help the adoption of these materials in civil engineering thereby reducing the environmental impact of these waste materials. The objectives...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lewis, Kemp Sloan
Format: Others
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2152/23639
id ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-23639
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-236392015-09-20T17:21:47ZAnalysis of dredge materials and crushed glass blends with uniaxial geogrids in pullout testsLewis, Kemp SloanPulloutPull outCrushed glassDredged materialDredge materialUniaxial geogridsBeing able to identify blended dredged material and crushed glass of different proportions as materials suitable for Mechanically Stabilized Earth walls could help the adoption of these materials in civil engineering thereby reducing the environmental impact of these waste materials. The objectives of this thesis include the following: Collect and organize data to facilitate material selection based on interaction properties with uniaxial geogrids; analyze the data for trends for varying percentages of crushed glass vs. dredged materials; compare the properties of different blends with those of a well-documented uniform sand; compare the pullout data with that of previous studies related to the presence of fines in the fill material; and compare the pullout data to that of previous studies on the effect of geogrid rib thickness. The main findings of this thesis study include the following: A blend of 80% crushed glass and 20% dredged material is a legitimate alternative backfill material for reinforced soil slopes. The use of 100% crushed glass as a fill material is not recommended due to glass particles embedding into the geogrid thereby reducing the tensile capacity of the geogrid. Blends with lower percentages of crushed glass and higher percentages of dredged material may be appropriate based on the requirements of individual designs. The increased thickness of the UX1700 geogrid over the UX1400 geogrid contributed to higher a pullout resistance for each combination of fill material and normal stress.text2014-03-24T19:30:11Z2013-122014-02-04December 20132014-03-24T19:30:12ZThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/23639
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Pullout
Pull out
Crushed glass
Dredged material
Dredge material
Uniaxial geogrids
spellingShingle Pullout
Pull out
Crushed glass
Dredged material
Dredge material
Uniaxial geogrids
Lewis, Kemp Sloan
Analysis of dredge materials and crushed glass blends with uniaxial geogrids in pullout tests
description Being able to identify blended dredged material and crushed glass of different proportions as materials suitable for Mechanically Stabilized Earth walls could help the adoption of these materials in civil engineering thereby reducing the environmental impact of these waste materials. The objectives of this thesis include the following: Collect and organize data to facilitate material selection based on interaction properties with uniaxial geogrids; analyze the data for trends for varying percentages of crushed glass vs. dredged materials; compare the properties of different blends with those of a well-documented uniform sand; compare the pullout data with that of previous studies related to the presence of fines in the fill material; and compare the pullout data to that of previous studies on the effect of geogrid rib thickness. The main findings of this thesis study include the following: A blend of 80% crushed glass and 20% dredged material is a legitimate alternative backfill material for reinforced soil slopes. The use of 100% crushed glass as a fill material is not recommended due to glass particles embedding into the geogrid thereby reducing the tensile capacity of the geogrid. Blends with lower percentages of crushed glass and higher percentages of dredged material may be appropriate based on the requirements of individual designs. The increased thickness of the UX1700 geogrid over the UX1400 geogrid contributed to higher a pullout resistance for each combination of fill material and normal stress. === text
author Lewis, Kemp Sloan
author_facet Lewis, Kemp Sloan
author_sort Lewis, Kemp Sloan
title Analysis of dredge materials and crushed glass blends with uniaxial geogrids in pullout tests
title_short Analysis of dredge materials and crushed glass blends with uniaxial geogrids in pullout tests
title_full Analysis of dredge materials and crushed glass blends with uniaxial geogrids in pullout tests
title_fullStr Analysis of dredge materials and crushed glass blends with uniaxial geogrids in pullout tests
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of dredge materials and crushed glass blends with uniaxial geogrids in pullout tests
title_sort analysis of dredge materials and crushed glass blends with uniaxial geogrids in pullout tests
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/2152/23639
work_keys_str_mv AT lewiskempsloan analysisofdredgematerialsandcrushedglassblendswithuniaxialgeogridsinpullouttests
_version_ 1716823670058385408