Fossils, phylogeny, and anatomical regions : insights exemplified through turtles
There are more than 300 species of extant turtles, the majority of which belong to the Testudinoidea. Here I describe a new box turtle from the Eocene-Oligocene boundary of west Texas. This specimen impacts the phylogeny of Testudinoid turtles by pulling the divergence of extant Testudinoid turtles...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2152/22225 |
id |
ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-22225 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UTEXAS-oai-repositories.lib.utexas.edu-2152-222252015-09-20T17:18:16ZFossils, phylogeny, and anatomical regions : insights exemplified through turtlesBurroughs, Robert WaynePaleontologyHerpetologyPhylogenyBox turtleAnatomical regionBayesian analysisThere are more than 300 species of extant turtles, the majority of which belong to the Testudinoidea. Here I describe a new box turtle from the Eocene-Oligocene boundary of west Texas. This specimen impacts the phylogeny of Testudinoid turtles by pulling the divergence of extant Testudinoid turtles back in time approximately 25 million years. This results in a need to refocus on paleontological research of Testudinoid turtles into the late Paleogene and early Neogene to identify fossil localities and specimens that can help further elucidate the evolution of the group. New work on the fossil record of turtles also requires a re-evaluation of methods used for identifying and evaluating the evolutionary history of turtles as a group. An implicit assumption over the last 150 years of turtle paleontology was that both turtle shells and turtle heads reveal congruent and complimentary evolutionary relationships. This assumption was never adequately tested. I utilized a series of methods to evaluate the congruency of phylogenetic hypotheses using disparate anatomical regions. Using a dataset of extant Emydid turtles, I evaluated whether turtle shells and turtle heads provided congruent and complimentary phylogenetic hypotheses. My methods employed parsimony-based reconstruction, maximum-likelihood-based reconstruction, and Bayesian-based reconstruction, including Bayesian-partition analyses. My conclusions are that heads and shells do not provide fully congruent topologies, and that in many cases there is a loss of phylogenetic resolution when only turtle sklls are used to generate phylogenies. The implication is that a focus on a robust and complete dataset of anatomical features will provide the best basis for further investigation of fossils. My work also provides a framework for dataset exploration by providing a method to identify the most robust phylogenetic signal found within a dataset. This framework will allow non-turtle paleontologists and systematists the ability to further investigate their own datasets and develop robust hypotheses of evolutionary relationships across the diversity of the tree of Life.text2013-11-15T18:20:21Z2013-082013-09-05August 20132013-11-15T18:20:22Zapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/2152/22225en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Paleontology Herpetology Phylogeny Box turtle Anatomical region Bayesian analysis |
spellingShingle |
Paleontology Herpetology Phylogeny Box turtle Anatomical region Bayesian analysis Burroughs, Robert Wayne Fossils, phylogeny, and anatomical regions : insights exemplified through turtles |
description |
There are more than 300 species of extant turtles, the majority of which belong to the Testudinoidea. Here I describe a new box turtle from the Eocene-Oligocene boundary of west Texas. This specimen impacts the phylogeny of Testudinoid turtles by pulling the divergence of extant Testudinoid turtles back in time approximately 25 million years. This results in a need to refocus on paleontological research of Testudinoid turtles into the late Paleogene and early Neogene to identify fossil localities and specimens that can help further elucidate the evolution of the group. New work on the fossil record of turtles also requires a re-evaluation of methods used for identifying and evaluating the evolutionary history of turtles as a group. An implicit assumption over the last 150 years of turtle paleontology was that both turtle shells and turtle heads reveal congruent and complimentary evolutionary relationships. This assumption was never adequately tested. I utilized a series of methods to evaluate the congruency of phylogenetic hypotheses using disparate anatomical regions. Using a dataset of extant Emydid turtles, I evaluated whether turtle shells and turtle heads provided congruent and complimentary phylogenetic hypotheses. My methods employed parsimony-based reconstruction, maximum-likelihood-based reconstruction, and Bayesian-based reconstruction, including Bayesian-partition analyses. My conclusions are that heads and shells do not provide fully congruent topologies, and that in many cases there is a loss of phylogenetic resolution when only turtle sklls are used to generate phylogenies. The implication is that a focus on a robust and complete dataset of anatomical features will provide the best basis for further investigation of fossils. My work also provides a framework for dataset exploration by providing a method to identify the most robust phylogenetic signal found within a dataset. This framework will allow non-turtle paleontologists and systematists the ability to further investigate their own datasets and develop robust hypotheses of evolutionary relationships across the diversity of the tree of Life. === text |
author |
Burroughs, Robert Wayne |
author_facet |
Burroughs, Robert Wayne |
author_sort |
Burroughs, Robert Wayne |
title |
Fossils, phylogeny, and anatomical regions : insights exemplified through turtles |
title_short |
Fossils, phylogeny, and anatomical regions : insights exemplified through turtles |
title_full |
Fossils, phylogeny, and anatomical regions : insights exemplified through turtles |
title_fullStr |
Fossils, phylogeny, and anatomical regions : insights exemplified through turtles |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fossils, phylogeny, and anatomical regions : insights exemplified through turtles |
title_sort |
fossils, phylogeny, and anatomical regions : insights exemplified through turtles |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2152/22225 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT burroughsrobertwayne fossilsphylogenyandanatomicalregionsinsightsexemplifiedthroughturtles |
_version_ |
1716823385330155520 |