Methodological Considerations: Osteoarthritis and the Significance of Porosity in the William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection

Osteoarthritis is one of many diseases that accompany the ascension into old age. It has been documented in animals and humans alike. The current research examines porosity’s relationship to osteoarthritis. European American females and African American and European American males from the contempor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wren, Kimberly Tenese
Published: Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/211
id ndltd-UTENN-oai-trace.tennessee.edu-utk_gradthes-1243
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTENN-oai-trace.tennessee.edu-utk_gradthes-12432011-12-13T16:22:08Z Methodological Considerations: Osteoarthritis and the Significance of Porosity in the William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection Wren, Kimberly Tenese Osteoarthritis is one of many diseases that accompany the ascension into old age. It has been documented in animals and humans alike. The current research examines porosity’s relationship to osteoarthritis. European American females and African American and European American males from the contemporary William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection are analyzed. The objective of this study is to determine whether or not a change in the relationship of osteoarthritis severity to porosity severity will occur as the criteria used to identify osteoarthritis changes from osteophytes alone (method I), to eburnation alone (method II), and then both osteophytes and eburnation (method III). The significance of the relationship of osteoarthritis severity to porosity severity is also examined for each method to determine whether or not porosity is related to osteoarthritis. The data reveal that in most instances there is not a change in the relationship of porosity severity to osteoarthritis severity when utilizing method I versus method III to identify osteoarthritis. However, the relationship of osteoarthritis severity to porosity severity changes when utilizing method II (eburnation) as the sole identifying criterion of osteoarthritis. There also appears to be a significant relationship between porosity severity and osteoarthritis severity in the left hips of African American and European American males. Furthermore, in the knee, porosity’s significance to OA, using any of the three methods, tended to be positively correlated with sample size. This suggests that porosity might be related to osteoarthritis and consequently should not be excluded as a criterion for osteoarthritis presence. 2007-05-01 text http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/211 Masters Theses Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Anthropology
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic Anthropology
spellingShingle Anthropology
Wren, Kimberly Tenese
Methodological Considerations: Osteoarthritis and the Significance of Porosity in the William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection
description Osteoarthritis is one of many diseases that accompany the ascension into old age. It has been documented in animals and humans alike. The current research examines porosity’s relationship to osteoarthritis. European American females and African American and European American males from the contemporary William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection are analyzed. The objective of this study is to determine whether or not a change in the relationship of osteoarthritis severity to porosity severity will occur as the criteria used to identify osteoarthritis changes from osteophytes alone (method I), to eburnation alone (method II), and then both osteophytes and eburnation (method III). The significance of the relationship of osteoarthritis severity to porosity severity is also examined for each method to determine whether or not porosity is related to osteoarthritis. The data reveal that in most instances there is not a change in the relationship of porosity severity to osteoarthritis severity when utilizing method I versus method III to identify osteoarthritis. However, the relationship of osteoarthritis severity to porosity severity changes when utilizing method II (eburnation) as the sole identifying criterion of osteoarthritis. There also appears to be a significant relationship between porosity severity and osteoarthritis severity in the left hips of African American and European American males. Furthermore, in the knee, porosity’s significance to OA, using any of the three methods, tended to be positively correlated with sample size. This suggests that porosity might be related to osteoarthritis and consequently should not be excluded as a criterion for osteoarthritis presence.
author Wren, Kimberly Tenese
author_facet Wren, Kimberly Tenese
author_sort Wren, Kimberly Tenese
title Methodological Considerations: Osteoarthritis and the Significance of Porosity in the William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection
title_short Methodological Considerations: Osteoarthritis and the Significance of Porosity in the William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection
title_full Methodological Considerations: Osteoarthritis and the Significance of Porosity in the William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection
title_fullStr Methodological Considerations: Osteoarthritis and the Significance of Porosity in the William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Considerations: Osteoarthritis and the Significance of Porosity in the William M. Bass Donated Skeletal Collection
title_sort methodological considerations: osteoarthritis and the significance of porosity in the william m. bass donated skeletal collection
publisher Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange
publishDate 2007
url http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/211
work_keys_str_mv AT wrenkimberlytenese methodologicalconsiderationsosteoarthritisandthesignificanceofporosityinthewilliammbassdonatedskeletalcollection
_version_ 1716390451880132608