The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students

Forty-seven gifted and non-gifted African American and Caucasian students in grades third through fifth were rated by their teachers on the Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, and Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) (McCallum & Bracken, in press). Internal consistency was high with Chronbac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jordan, Kelli R.
Format: Others
Published: Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/810
id ndltd-UTENN-oai-trace.tennessee.edu-utk_graddiss-1868
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTENN-oai-trace.tennessee.edu-utk_graddiss-18682011-12-13T16:04:05Z The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students Jordan, Kelli R. Forty-seven gifted and non-gifted African American and Caucasian students in grades third through fifth were rated by their teachers on the Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, and Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) (McCallum & Bracken, in press). Internal consistency was high with Chronbach’s alphas ranging from .97 to .99 and correlation coefficients for the six scales ranged from .42 to .92. Factorial MANOVA’s for each composite scale showed no significant score differences between African American and Caucasian students. There was a significant difference in scores based on placement, with higher scores in favor of gifted students on both the General Aptitude Composite (Wilk’s Lambda=. 70, F(3,41) = 5.87, p <. 01 and the Specific Academic Aptitude Composite (Wilk’s Lambda=. 73, F(3,41) = 5.03, p <. 01. There were no interaction effects for placement x race. A discriminant analysis using the six UACCESS scales resulted in 76.6% of participants being correctly classified as gifted or non-gifted. There were no score differences across gender. Based on the results of this study, the UACCESS shows some promise as an effective gifted screening instrument to supplement the referral/nomination process. 2010-08-01 text application/pdf http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/810 Doctoral Dissertations Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Gifted Education African-American students underrepresentation Universal ACCESS gifted screening scales Gifted Education
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Gifted Education
African-American students
underrepresentation
Universal ACCESS
gifted screening scales
Gifted Education
spellingShingle Gifted Education
African-American students
underrepresentation
Universal ACCESS
gifted screening scales
Gifted Education
Jordan, Kelli R.
The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students
description Forty-seven gifted and non-gifted African American and Caucasian students in grades third through fifth were rated by their teachers on the Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, and Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) (McCallum & Bracken, in press). Internal consistency was high with Chronbach’s alphas ranging from .97 to .99 and correlation coefficients for the six scales ranged from .42 to .92. Factorial MANOVA’s for each composite scale showed no significant score differences between African American and Caucasian students. There was a significant difference in scores based on placement, with higher scores in favor of gifted students on both the General Aptitude Composite (Wilk’s Lambda=. 70, F(3,41) = 5.87, p <. 01 and the Specific Academic Aptitude Composite (Wilk’s Lambda=. 73, F(3,41) = 5.03, p <. 01. There were no interaction effects for placement x race. A discriminant analysis using the six UACCESS scales resulted in 76.6% of participants being correctly classified as gifted or non-gifted. There were no score differences across gender. Based on the results of this study, the UACCESS shows some promise as an effective gifted screening instrument to supplement the referral/nomination process.
author Jordan, Kelli R.
author_facet Jordan, Kelli R.
author_sort Jordan, Kelli R.
title The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students
title_short The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students
title_full The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students
title_fullStr The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students
title_full_unstemmed The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students
title_sort universal academic, cognitive, creativity, emotion screening scale (uaccess) score comparisons between african american and caucasian gifted and non-gifted students
publisher Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange
publishDate 2010
url http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/810
work_keys_str_mv AT jordankellir theuniversalacademiccognitivecreativityemotionscreeningscaleuaccessscorecomparisonsbetweenafricanamericanandcaucasiangiftedandnongiftedstudents
AT jordankellir universalacademiccognitivecreativityemotionscreeningscaleuaccessscorecomparisonsbetweenafricanamericanandcaucasiangiftedandnongiftedstudents
_version_ 1716389974011543552