The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students
Forty-seven gifted and non-gifted African American and Caucasian students in grades third through fifth were rated by their teachers on the Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, and Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) (McCallum & Bracken, in press). Internal consistency was high with Chronbac...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/810 |
id |
ndltd-UTENN-oai-trace.tennessee.edu-utk_graddiss-1868 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UTENN-oai-trace.tennessee.edu-utk_graddiss-18682011-12-13T16:04:05Z The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students Jordan, Kelli R. Forty-seven gifted and non-gifted African American and Caucasian students in grades third through fifth were rated by their teachers on the Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, and Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) (McCallum & Bracken, in press). Internal consistency was high with Chronbach’s alphas ranging from .97 to .99 and correlation coefficients for the six scales ranged from .42 to .92. Factorial MANOVA’s for each composite scale showed no significant score differences between African American and Caucasian students. There was a significant difference in scores based on placement, with higher scores in favor of gifted students on both the General Aptitude Composite (Wilk’s Lambda=. 70, F(3,41) = 5.87, p <. 01 and the Specific Academic Aptitude Composite (Wilk’s Lambda=. 73, F(3,41) = 5.03, p <. 01. There were no interaction effects for placement x race. A discriminant analysis using the six UACCESS scales resulted in 76.6% of participants being correctly classified as gifted or non-gifted. There were no score differences across gender. Based on the results of this study, the UACCESS shows some promise as an effective gifted screening instrument to supplement the referral/nomination process. 2010-08-01 text application/pdf http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/810 Doctoral Dissertations Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Gifted Education African-American students underrepresentation Universal ACCESS gifted screening scales Gifted Education |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Gifted Education African-American students underrepresentation Universal ACCESS gifted screening scales Gifted Education |
spellingShingle |
Gifted Education African-American students underrepresentation Universal ACCESS gifted screening scales Gifted Education Jordan, Kelli R. The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students |
description |
Forty-seven gifted and non-gifted African American and Caucasian students in grades third through fifth were rated by their teachers on the Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, and Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) (McCallum & Bracken, in press). Internal consistency was high with Chronbach’s alphas ranging from .97 to .99 and correlation coefficients for the six scales ranged from .42 to .92. Factorial MANOVA’s for each composite scale showed no significant score differences between African American and Caucasian students. There was a significant difference in scores based on placement, with higher scores in favor of gifted students on both the General Aptitude Composite (Wilk’s Lambda=. 70, F(3,41) = 5.87, p <. 01 and the Specific Academic Aptitude Composite (Wilk’s Lambda=. 73, F(3,41) = 5.03, p <. 01. There were no interaction effects for placement x race. A discriminant analysis using the six UACCESS scales resulted in 76.6% of participants being correctly classified as gifted or non-gifted. There were no score differences across gender. Based on the results of this study, the UACCESS shows some promise as an effective gifted screening instrument to supplement the referral/nomination process. |
author |
Jordan, Kelli R. |
author_facet |
Jordan, Kelli R. |
author_sort |
Jordan, Kelli R. |
title |
The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students |
title_short |
The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students |
title_full |
The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students |
title_fullStr |
The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Universal Academic, Cognitive, Creativity, Emotion Screening Scale (UACCESS) Score Comparisons between African American and Caucasian Gifted and Non-gifted Students |
title_sort |
universal academic, cognitive, creativity, emotion screening scale (uaccess) score comparisons between african american and caucasian gifted and non-gifted students |
publisher |
Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/810 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jordankellir theuniversalacademiccognitivecreativityemotionscreeningscaleuaccessscorecomparisonsbetweenafricanamericanandcaucasiangiftedandnongiftedstudents AT jordankellir universalacademiccognitivecreativityemotionscreeningscaleuaccessscorecomparisonsbetweenafricanamericanandcaucasiangiftedandnongiftedstudents |
_version_ |
1716389974011543552 |