Efficacy of Guard Llamas (Lama glama) in Reducing Canid Predation on Domestic Sheep

Predation, especially by canid predators, is a significant cause of sheep loss for many producers. In recent years, the use of llamas to protect sheep from predators has gained recognition as a depredation control method. I conducted a field experiment to test the effectiveness of llamas in reducing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Meadows, Laurie E.
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6584
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7640&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-7640
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-76402019-10-13T05:56:42Z Efficacy of Guard Llamas (Lama glama) in Reducing Canid Predation on Domestic Sheep Meadows, Laurie E. Predation, especially by canid predators, is a significant cause of sheep loss for many producers. In recent years, the use of llamas to protect sheep from predators has gained recognition as a depredation control method. I conducted a field experiment to test the effectiveness of llamas in reducing canid predation on domestic sheep. Twenty-one llamas were placed with Utah sheep producers. Data collected from these flocks over 20 months were compared to similar data collected from flocks without llamas. Comparisons between treatment and control flocks included (l) proportion of flocks with losses to predators, (2) mean predation rates on ewes and lambs, and (3) lamb predation rate distributions. Two surveys were conducted during the study to assess producer opinions on the inclusion of llamas in their sheep management programs. In all 3 comparisons of lamb losses between treatments and controls, losses sustained by control flocks in Lambing Season l (LS l) were significantly higher than those of flocks with llamas. Among treatment flocks, losses were similar for LS l and Lambing Season 2 (LS2). Among controls, LS2 losses dropped to the level of treatment flocks. My results suggest predation may have to reach some threshold before guard llamas have an effect on losses. Results of surveys of producers with llamas indicated they support the use of llamas as guard animals for sheep. 1999-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6584 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7640&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact digitalcommons@usu.edu. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
spellingShingle Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
Meadows, Laurie E.
Efficacy of Guard Llamas (Lama glama) in Reducing Canid Predation on Domestic Sheep
description Predation, especially by canid predators, is a significant cause of sheep loss for many producers. In recent years, the use of llamas to protect sheep from predators has gained recognition as a depredation control method. I conducted a field experiment to test the effectiveness of llamas in reducing canid predation on domestic sheep. Twenty-one llamas were placed with Utah sheep producers. Data collected from these flocks over 20 months were compared to similar data collected from flocks without llamas. Comparisons between treatment and control flocks included (l) proportion of flocks with losses to predators, (2) mean predation rates on ewes and lambs, and (3) lamb predation rate distributions. Two surveys were conducted during the study to assess producer opinions on the inclusion of llamas in their sheep management programs. In all 3 comparisons of lamb losses between treatments and controls, losses sustained by control flocks in Lambing Season l (LS l) were significantly higher than those of flocks with llamas. Among treatment flocks, losses were similar for LS l and Lambing Season 2 (LS2). Among controls, LS2 losses dropped to the level of treatment flocks. My results suggest predation may have to reach some threshold before guard llamas have an effect on losses. Results of surveys of producers with llamas indicated they support the use of llamas as guard animals for sheep.
author Meadows, Laurie E.
author_facet Meadows, Laurie E.
author_sort Meadows, Laurie E.
title Efficacy of Guard Llamas (Lama glama) in Reducing Canid Predation on Domestic Sheep
title_short Efficacy of Guard Llamas (Lama glama) in Reducing Canid Predation on Domestic Sheep
title_full Efficacy of Guard Llamas (Lama glama) in Reducing Canid Predation on Domestic Sheep
title_fullStr Efficacy of Guard Llamas (Lama glama) in Reducing Canid Predation on Domestic Sheep
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Guard Llamas (Lama glama) in Reducing Canid Predation on Domestic Sheep
title_sort efficacy of guard llamas (lama glama) in reducing canid predation on domestic sheep
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 1999
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6584
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7640&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT meadowslauriee efficacyofguardllamaslamaglamainreducingcanidpredationondomesticsheep
_version_ 1719267427930341376