Comparison of the Standard and Computerized Versions of the College Level Examination Program General Examination in English Composition

The purpose of this study was to test whether the computer-administered College Level Examination Program (CLEP) General Examination in English Composition produced scores equivalent to those obtained from the traditional paper-and-pencil version. The CLEP examination and its adaptation for computer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhlestein, Alan L.
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 1981
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5986
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7064&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-7064
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-70642019-10-13T05:44:29Z Comparison of the Standard and Computerized Versions of the College Level Examination Program General Examination in English Composition Muhlestein, Alan L. The purpose of this study was to test whether the computer-administered College Level Examination Program (CLEP) General Examination in English Composition produced scores equivalent to those obtained from the traditional paper-and-pencil version. The CLEP examination and its adaptation for computer administration and the results of a pilot study are presented. The subjects in this study were volunteers who took the CLEP English Composition Examination in order to earn college credit and were randomly assigned to either the computer-first or paper-and-pencil-first groups. Each subject took both forms of the examination with approximately one half of the subjects taking each version first. Analysis of variance failed to detect a significant effect for test form or an interaction of test form and order of administration. Equivalence reliability coefficients and internal consistency coefficients also indicated that the computer administration did not significantly alter the results of the examination. In general, the results of this study support the hypothesis that the computer-administered version of the CLEP General Examination in English Composition produces results equivalent to those obtained from the traditional paper-and-pencil version. 1981-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5986 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7064&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact digitalcommons@usu.edu. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU literature computerized testing computer testing testing paper testing pencil and paper equivalency computer-administered Psychology
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic literature
computerized testing
computer testing
testing
paper testing
pencil and paper
equivalency
computer-administered
Psychology
spellingShingle literature
computerized testing
computer testing
testing
paper testing
pencil and paper
equivalency
computer-administered
Psychology
Muhlestein, Alan L.
Comparison of the Standard and Computerized Versions of the College Level Examination Program General Examination in English Composition
description The purpose of this study was to test whether the computer-administered College Level Examination Program (CLEP) General Examination in English Composition produced scores equivalent to those obtained from the traditional paper-and-pencil version. The CLEP examination and its adaptation for computer administration and the results of a pilot study are presented. The subjects in this study were volunteers who took the CLEP English Composition Examination in order to earn college credit and were randomly assigned to either the computer-first or paper-and-pencil-first groups. Each subject took both forms of the examination with approximately one half of the subjects taking each version first. Analysis of variance failed to detect a significant effect for test form or an interaction of test form and order of administration. Equivalence reliability coefficients and internal consistency coefficients also indicated that the computer administration did not significantly alter the results of the examination. In general, the results of this study support the hypothesis that the computer-administered version of the CLEP General Examination in English Composition produces results equivalent to those obtained from the traditional paper-and-pencil version.
author Muhlestein, Alan L.
author_facet Muhlestein, Alan L.
author_sort Muhlestein, Alan L.
title Comparison of the Standard and Computerized Versions of the College Level Examination Program General Examination in English Composition
title_short Comparison of the Standard and Computerized Versions of the College Level Examination Program General Examination in English Composition
title_full Comparison of the Standard and Computerized Versions of the College Level Examination Program General Examination in English Composition
title_fullStr Comparison of the Standard and Computerized Versions of the College Level Examination Program General Examination in English Composition
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Standard and Computerized Versions of the College Level Examination Program General Examination in English Composition
title_sort comparison of the standard and computerized versions of the college level examination program general examination in english composition
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 1981
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5986
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7064&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT muhlesteinalanl comparisonofthestandardandcomputerizedversionsofthecollegelevelexaminationprogramgeneralexaminationinenglishcomposition
_version_ 1719266567685931008