The Effect of Elaboration on Memory: Self-Generated Elaboration vs Experimenter-Provided Elaboration

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of elaborations on memory . Two types of elaborations (self-generated elaboration and experimenterprovided elaboration) were examined. The experiment consisted of three phases (incidental learning phase, immediate test phase, and delayed test p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kim, Sung-il
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 1988
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5961
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7043&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-7043
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-70432019-10-13T05:41:39Z The Effect of Elaboration on Memory: Self-Generated Elaboration vs Experimenter-Provided Elaboration Kim, Sung-il The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of elaborations on memory . Two types of elaborations (self-generated elaboration and experimenterprovided elaboration) were examined. The experiment consisted of three phases (incidental learning phase, immediate test phase, and delayed test phase). In the incidental learning phase, subjects were asked to make plausibility judgments about 28 fictitious episodes. Half of these were about well-known individuals and the other half were about unknown individuals. Each name (either well-known or unknown) was presented with either two supportive facts or without the supportive facts. During the immediate test phase, subjects were given unexpected memory tests. One week later, unexpected delayed memory tests were administered. Results from both immediate and delayed tests indicated that self-generated elaborations based on prior knowledge subjects had about well-known individuals enhanced the retention of target information, whereas experimenter-provided elaborations involving the presence of supportive facts only benefited memory performance when the subjects had prior knowledge about the individuals. Experimenter-provided elaborations were also effective to the extent that the encoding context was reinstated at testing. 1988-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5961 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7043&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact digitalcommons@usu.edu. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU elaboration memory self-generated experimenter-provided Psychology
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic elaboration
memory
self-generated
experimenter-provided
Psychology
spellingShingle elaboration
memory
self-generated
experimenter-provided
Psychology
Kim, Sung-il
The Effect of Elaboration on Memory: Self-Generated Elaboration vs Experimenter-Provided Elaboration
description The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of elaborations on memory . Two types of elaborations (self-generated elaboration and experimenterprovided elaboration) were examined. The experiment consisted of three phases (incidental learning phase, immediate test phase, and delayed test phase). In the incidental learning phase, subjects were asked to make plausibility judgments about 28 fictitious episodes. Half of these were about well-known individuals and the other half were about unknown individuals. Each name (either well-known or unknown) was presented with either two supportive facts or without the supportive facts. During the immediate test phase, subjects were given unexpected memory tests. One week later, unexpected delayed memory tests were administered. Results from both immediate and delayed tests indicated that self-generated elaborations based on prior knowledge subjects had about well-known individuals enhanced the retention of target information, whereas experimenter-provided elaborations involving the presence of supportive facts only benefited memory performance when the subjects had prior knowledge about the individuals. Experimenter-provided elaborations were also effective to the extent that the encoding context was reinstated at testing.
author Kim, Sung-il
author_facet Kim, Sung-il
author_sort Kim, Sung-il
title The Effect of Elaboration on Memory: Self-Generated Elaboration vs Experimenter-Provided Elaboration
title_short The Effect of Elaboration on Memory: Self-Generated Elaboration vs Experimenter-Provided Elaboration
title_full The Effect of Elaboration on Memory: Self-Generated Elaboration vs Experimenter-Provided Elaboration
title_fullStr The Effect of Elaboration on Memory: Self-Generated Elaboration vs Experimenter-Provided Elaboration
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Elaboration on Memory: Self-Generated Elaboration vs Experimenter-Provided Elaboration
title_sort effect of elaboration on memory: self-generated elaboration vs experimenter-provided elaboration
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 1988
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5961
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7043&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsungil theeffectofelaborationonmemoryselfgeneratedelaborationvsexperimenterprovidedelaboration
AT kimsungil effectofelaborationonmemoryselfgeneratedelaborationvsexperimenterprovidedelaboration
_version_ 1719266566960316416