Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement Time in People with Cystic Fibrosis

A retrospective chart review was conducted on pediatric patients at the Intermountain Cystic Fibrosis Center who had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placed between 1993 and 1999. Height velocity improved significantly in the group of patients with a PEG placed; however, pulmonary functio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gunnell, Sarah
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 2002
Subjects:
PEG
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5485
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6543&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-6543
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-65432019-10-13T05:44:29Z Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement Time in People with Cystic Fibrosis Gunnell, Sarah A retrospective chart review was conducted on pediatric patients at the Intermountain Cystic Fibrosis Center who had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placed between 1993 and 1999. Height velocity improved significantly in the group of patients with a PEG placed; however, pulmonary function declined more significantly over time. Questionnaires regarding attitude toward PEG placement were sent to patients enrolled in accredited cystic fibrosis centers in the mountain west region and to their parents. The overall response rate was 54.25% for the PEG questionnaire and 24% for the non-PEG questionnaire. Ninety-six percent of the patients with a PEG reported that weight was a problem at time of placement, and 91% reported weight gain after PEG ill placement. Sixty-four percent of the patients with a PEG reported that they would have a PEG placed if they made the decision again. Of the patients without a PEG, 60.7% thought a PEG looked bad, and 59.2% would be embarrassed to have a PEG. Forty-nine percent of patients without a PEG expressed a lack of knowledge of the pros and cons of PEG placement and 35.4% had no opinion about their knowledge of PEGs. PEG placement can be beneficial in improving nutritional status. Optimal time for PEG placement may be earlier rather than after pulmonary function has declined. People with a PEG have felt positive toward placement, and those without a PEG seem to lack knowledge about the pros and cons of PEG placement. 2002-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5485 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6543&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact digitalcommons@usu.edu. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU cystic fibrosis PEG placement time percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy Diseases Other Medicine and Health Sciences
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic cystic fibrosis
PEG
placement time
percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
Diseases
Other Medicine and Health Sciences
spellingShingle cystic fibrosis
PEG
placement time
percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
Diseases
Other Medicine and Health Sciences
Gunnell, Sarah
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement Time in People with Cystic Fibrosis
description A retrospective chart review was conducted on pediatric patients at the Intermountain Cystic Fibrosis Center who had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placed between 1993 and 1999. Height velocity improved significantly in the group of patients with a PEG placed; however, pulmonary function declined more significantly over time. Questionnaires regarding attitude toward PEG placement were sent to patients enrolled in accredited cystic fibrosis centers in the mountain west region and to their parents. The overall response rate was 54.25% for the PEG questionnaire and 24% for the non-PEG questionnaire. Ninety-six percent of the patients with a PEG reported that weight was a problem at time of placement, and 91% reported weight gain after PEG ill placement. Sixty-four percent of the patients with a PEG reported that they would have a PEG placed if they made the decision again. Of the patients without a PEG, 60.7% thought a PEG looked bad, and 59.2% would be embarrassed to have a PEG. Forty-nine percent of patients without a PEG expressed a lack of knowledge of the pros and cons of PEG placement and 35.4% had no opinion about their knowledge of PEGs. PEG placement can be beneficial in improving nutritional status. Optimal time for PEG placement may be earlier rather than after pulmonary function has declined. People with a PEG have felt positive toward placement, and those without a PEG seem to lack knowledge about the pros and cons of PEG placement.
author Gunnell, Sarah
author_facet Gunnell, Sarah
author_sort Gunnell, Sarah
title Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement Time in People with Cystic Fibrosis
title_short Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement Time in People with Cystic Fibrosis
title_full Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement Time in People with Cystic Fibrosis
title_fullStr Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement Time in People with Cystic Fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement Time in People with Cystic Fibrosis
title_sort percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement time in people with cystic fibrosis
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 2002
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/5485
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6543&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT gunnellsarah percutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyplacementtimeinpeoplewithcysticfibrosis
_version_ 1719266536331411456