Traditional Lecture Versus an Activity Approach for Teaching Statistics: A Comparison of Outcomes

Many educational researchers have proposed teaching statistics with less lecture and more active learning methods. However, there are only a few comparative studies that have taught one section of statistics with lectures and one section with activity-based methods; of those studies, the results are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Loveland, Jennifer L.
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2086
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3089&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-3089
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-30892019-10-13T06:00:47Z Traditional Lecture Versus an Activity Approach for Teaching Statistics: A Comparison of Outcomes Loveland, Jennifer L. Many educational researchers have proposed teaching statistics with less lecture and more active learning methods. However, there are only a few comparative studies that have taught one section of statistics with lectures and one section with activity-based methods; of those studies, the results are contradictory. To address the need for more research on the actual effectiveness of active learning methods in introductory statistics, this research study was undertaken. An introductory, university level course was divided into two sections. One section was taught entirely with traditional lecture. The other section was taught using active learning methods and a minimal amount of lecture. Both sections were taught by the same instructor during the same semester. The experiment was repeated the next semester. Students' exam scores were analyzed to determine if the activity-based teaching approach led to higher student comprehension and understanding of statistical concepts, and the ability to apply statistical procedures. Surveys were also administered to students to ascertain if the lecture or activity-based approach led to higher, more positive student attitudes toward statistics. Analysis of the data did not show that the activity-based teaching method led to higher student comprehension or procedural ability. Neither teaching method led to signicantly higher student attitudes. Student comments indicated a positive response to the activity-based methods, but the responses also indicated a student desire for more teacher-centered time in the activity course. 2014-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2086 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3089&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact Andrew Wesolek (andrew.wesolek@usu.edu). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU Traditional Lecture Activity Teaching Statistics Mathematics
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Traditional Lecture
Activity
Teaching
Statistics
Mathematics
spellingShingle Traditional Lecture
Activity
Teaching
Statistics
Mathematics
Loveland, Jennifer L.
Traditional Lecture Versus an Activity Approach for Teaching Statistics: A Comparison of Outcomes
description Many educational researchers have proposed teaching statistics with less lecture and more active learning methods. However, there are only a few comparative studies that have taught one section of statistics with lectures and one section with activity-based methods; of those studies, the results are contradictory. To address the need for more research on the actual effectiveness of active learning methods in introductory statistics, this research study was undertaken. An introductory, university level course was divided into two sections. One section was taught entirely with traditional lecture. The other section was taught using active learning methods and a minimal amount of lecture. Both sections were taught by the same instructor during the same semester. The experiment was repeated the next semester. Students' exam scores were analyzed to determine if the activity-based teaching approach led to higher student comprehension and understanding of statistical concepts, and the ability to apply statistical procedures. Surveys were also administered to students to ascertain if the lecture or activity-based approach led to higher, more positive student attitudes toward statistics. Analysis of the data did not show that the activity-based teaching method led to higher student comprehension or procedural ability. Neither teaching method led to signicantly higher student attitudes. Student comments indicated a positive response to the activity-based methods, but the responses also indicated a student desire for more teacher-centered time in the activity course.
author Loveland, Jennifer L.
author_facet Loveland, Jennifer L.
author_sort Loveland, Jennifer L.
title Traditional Lecture Versus an Activity Approach for Teaching Statistics: A Comparison of Outcomes
title_short Traditional Lecture Versus an Activity Approach for Teaching Statistics: A Comparison of Outcomes
title_full Traditional Lecture Versus an Activity Approach for Teaching Statistics: A Comparison of Outcomes
title_fullStr Traditional Lecture Versus an Activity Approach for Teaching Statistics: A Comparison of Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Traditional Lecture Versus an Activity Approach for Teaching Statistics: A Comparison of Outcomes
title_sort traditional lecture versus an activity approach for teaching statistics: a comparison of outcomes
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 2014
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2086
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3089&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT lovelandjenniferl traditionallectureversusanactivityapproachforteachingstatisticsacomparisonofoutcomes
_version_ 1719267211735990272