A Controlled Study of the Flipped Classroom With Numerical Methods for Engineers

Recent advances in technology and ideology have unlocked entirely new directions for education research. Mounting pressure from increasing tuition costs and free, online course offerings are opening discussion and catalyzing change in the physical classroom. The flipped classroom is at the center of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bishop, Jacob L.
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2008
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3011&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-3011
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-30112019-10-13T05:41:11Z A Controlled Study of the Flipped Classroom With Numerical Methods for Engineers Bishop, Jacob L. Recent advances in technology and ideology have unlocked entirely new directions for education research. Mounting pressure from increasing tuition costs and free, online course offerings are opening discussion and catalyzing change in the physical classroom. The flipped classroom is at the center of this discussion. The flipped classroom is a new pedagogical method, which employs asynchronous video lectures, practice problems as homework, and active, group-based problem-solving activities in the classroom. It represents a unique combination of learning theories once thought to be incompatible—active, problem-based learning activities founded upon constructivist schema and instructional lectures derived from direct instruction methods founded upon behaviorist principles. The primary reason for examining this teaching method is that it holds the promise of delivering the best from both worlds. A controlled study of a sophomore-level numerical methods course was conducted using video lectures and model-eliciting activities (MEAs) in one section (treatment) and traditional group lecture-based teaching in the other (comparison). This study compared knowledge-based outcomes on two dimensions: conceptual understanding and conventional problem-solving ability. Homework and unit exams were used to assess conventional problem-solving ability, while quizzes and a conceptual test were used to measure conceptual understanding. There was no difference between sections on conceptual under- standing as measured by quizzes and concept test scores. The difference between average exam scores was also not significant. However, homework scores were significantly lower by 15.5 percentage points (out of 100), which was equivalent to an effect size of 0.70. This difference appears to be due to the fact that students in the MEA/video lecture section had a higher workload than students in the comparison section and consequently neglected to do some of the homework because it was not heavily weighted in the final course grade. A comparison of student evaluations across the sections of this course revealed that perceptions were significantly lower for the MEA/video lecture section on 3 items (out of 18). Based on student feedback, it is recommended that future implementations ensure tighter integration between MEAs and other required course assignments. This could involve using a higher number of shorter MEAs and more focus on the early introduction of MEAs to students. 2013-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2008 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3011&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact Andrew Wesolek (andrew.wesolek@usu.edu). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU Engineering Education
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Engineering Education
spellingShingle Engineering Education
Bishop, Jacob L.
A Controlled Study of the Flipped Classroom With Numerical Methods for Engineers
description Recent advances in technology and ideology have unlocked entirely new directions for education research. Mounting pressure from increasing tuition costs and free, online course offerings are opening discussion and catalyzing change in the physical classroom. The flipped classroom is at the center of this discussion. The flipped classroom is a new pedagogical method, which employs asynchronous video lectures, practice problems as homework, and active, group-based problem-solving activities in the classroom. It represents a unique combination of learning theories once thought to be incompatible—active, problem-based learning activities founded upon constructivist schema and instructional lectures derived from direct instruction methods founded upon behaviorist principles. The primary reason for examining this teaching method is that it holds the promise of delivering the best from both worlds. A controlled study of a sophomore-level numerical methods course was conducted using video lectures and model-eliciting activities (MEAs) in one section (treatment) and traditional group lecture-based teaching in the other (comparison). This study compared knowledge-based outcomes on two dimensions: conceptual understanding and conventional problem-solving ability. Homework and unit exams were used to assess conventional problem-solving ability, while quizzes and a conceptual test were used to measure conceptual understanding. There was no difference between sections on conceptual under- standing as measured by quizzes and concept test scores. The difference between average exam scores was also not significant. However, homework scores were significantly lower by 15.5 percentage points (out of 100), which was equivalent to an effect size of 0.70. This difference appears to be due to the fact that students in the MEA/video lecture section had a higher workload than students in the comparison section and consequently neglected to do some of the homework because it was not heavily weighted in the final course grade. A comparison of student evaluations across the sections of this course revealed that perceptions were significantly lower for the MEA/video lecture section on 3 items (out of 18). Based on student feedback, it is recommended that future implementations ensure tighter integration between MEAs and other required course assignments. This could involve using a higher number of shorter MEAs and more focus on the early introduction of MEAs to students.
author Bishop, Jacob L.
author_facet Bishop, Jacob L.
author_sort Bishop, Jacob L.
title A Controlled Study of the Flipped Classroom With Numerical Methods for Engineers
title_short A Controlled Study of the Flipped Classroom With Numerical Methods for Engineers
title_full A Controlled Study of the Flipped Classroom With Numerical Methods for Engineers
title_fullStr A Controlled Study of the Flipped Classroom With Numerical Methods for Engineers
title_full_unstemmed A Controlled Study of the Flipped Classroom With Numerical Methods for Engineers
title_sort controlled study of the flipped classroom with numerical methods for engineers
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 2013
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/2008
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3011&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT bishopjacobl acontrolledstudyoftheflippedclassroomwithnumericalmethodsforengineers
AT bishopjacobl controlledstudyoftheflippedclassroomwithnumericalmethodsforengineers
_version_ 1719266330835681280