Piano Key Weir Head Discharge Relationships

A piano key (PK) weir is a type of nonlinear (labyrinth-type) weir developed specifically for free-surface flow control structures with relatively small spillway footprints. Currently, no generally accepted standard PK weir design procedure is available. This is due, in part, to the large number o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anderson, Ricky M.
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/880
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1876&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-1876
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-18762019-10-13T06:11:33Z Piano Key Weir Head Discharge Relationships Anderson, Ricky M. A piano key (PK) weir is a type of nonlinear (labyrinth-type) weir developed specifically for free-surface flow control structures with relatively small spillway footprints. Currently, no generally accepted standard PK weir design procedure is available. This is due, in part, to the large number of geometric parameters and a limited understanding of their effects on discharge efficiency (discharge efficiency is quantified by the discharge coefficient of the standard weir equation). However, Hydrocoop, a non-profit French dam spillways association, has recommended a PK weir design and a head-discharge relationship specific to that geometry. To develop a better understanding of the effects of PK weir geometry on discharge efficiency, 13 laboratory-scale, 4-cycle PK and rectangular labyrinth weir configurations were tested. As a result, the influence of the following PK weir geometries and/or modifications on discharge efficiency were partially isolated: the inlet-to-outlet key width ratio, upstream, and downstream apex overhangs; sloped floors; raising the crest elevation via a parapet wall; fillets underneath the upstream overhangs; and the crest type. The physical model test matrix also included a PK weir configuration consistent with the Hydrocoop-recommended design. From the experimental results, the appropriateness of the Hydrocoop-recommended head-discharge relationship was evaluated, along with the discharge coefficient behavior associated with the standard weir equation. Finally, trapezoidal labyrinth weirs were compared to PK weirs to make a relative comparison of nonlinear weir discharge efficiency; comparisons were made considering crest length and structure footprint. 2011-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/880 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1876&context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact Andrew Wesolek (andrew.wesolek@usu.edu). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU Labyrinth Weir Piano Key Weir PK Weir Weir Civil Engineering Engineering Water Resource Management
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Labyrinth Weir
Piano Key Weir
PK Weir
Weir
Civil Engineering
Engineering
Water Resource Management
spellingShingle Labyrinth Weir
Piano Key Weir
PK Weir
Weir
Civil Engineering
Engineering
Water Resource Management
Anderson, Ricky M.
Piano Key Weir Head Discharge Relationships
description A piano key (PK) weir is a type of nonlinear (labyrinth-type) weir developed specifically for free-surface flow control structures with relatively small spillway footprints. Currently, no generally accepted standard PK weir design procedure is available. This is due, in part, to the large number of geometric parameters and a limited understanding of their effects on discharge efficiency (discharge efficiency is quantified by the discharge coefficient of the standard weir equation). However, Hydrocoop, a non-profit French dam spillways association, has recommended a PK weir design and a head-discharge relationship specific to that geometry. To develop a better understanding of the effects of PK weir geometry on discharge efficiency, 13 laboratory-scale, 4-cycle PK and rectangular labyrinth weir configurations were tested. As a result, the influence of the following PK weir geometries and/or modifications on discharge efficiency were partially isolated: the inlet-to-outlet key width ratio, upstream, and downstream apex overhangs; sloped floors; raising the crest elevation via a parapet wall; fillets underneath the upstream overhangs; and the crest type. The physical model test matrix also included a PK weir configuration consistent with the Hydrocoop-recommended design. From the experimental results, the appropriateness of the Hydrocoop-recommended head-discharge relationship was evaluated, along with the discharge coefficient behavior associated with the standard weir equation. Finally, trapezoidal labyrinth weirs were compared to PK weirs to make a relative comparison of nonlinear weir discharge efficiency; comparisons were made considering crest length and structure footprint.
author Anderson, Ricky M.
author_facet Anderson, Ricky M.
author_sort Anderson, Ricky M.
title Piano Key Weir Head Discharge Relationships
title_short Piano Key Weir Head Discharge Relationships
title_full Piano Key Weir Head Discharge Relationships
title_fullStr Piano Key Weir Head Discharge Relationships
title_full_unstemmed Piano Key Weir Head Discharge Relationships
title_sort piano key weir head discharge relationships
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 2011
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/880
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1876&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonrickym pianokeyweirheaddischargerelationships
_version_ 1719267963904720896