Factors Moderating the Association between Multiple Rating Sources of Geriatric Depression: Self, Informant, and Physician

Late-life depression is a major public health concern, associated with poor health outcomes, including doubling of dementia risk. Psychiatric evaluation is impractical in large epidemiological studies, which instead typically rely on self/informant reports, which are subject to various biases (stigm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hatch, Daniel J.
Format: Others
Published: DigitalCommons@USU 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/873
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1869&context=etd
id ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-1869
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UTAHS-oai-digitalcommons.usu.edu-etd-18692019-10-13T05:59:10Z Factors Moderating the Association between Multiple Rating Sources of Geriatric Depression: Self, Informant, and Physician Hatch, Daniel J. Late-life depression is a major public health concern, associated with poor health outcomes, including doubling of dementia risk. Psychiatric evaluation is impractical in large epidemiological studies, which instead typically rely on self/informant reports, which are subject to various biases (stigma, recall). Few studies have addressed level of agreement between sources. This study examined associations between these sources and assessed whether subject and informant variables moderated these associations. In a population-based study of dementia in Cache County, Utah (2002-5), 1,480 subjects completed an in-depth clinical assessment (CA). Major depression was assessed via the self-report Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and informant-rated Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-CA). One hundred forty-eight subjects with cognitive impairment also completed a psychiatrist’s examination, including the self-report Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the informant-rated NPI (NPI-MD), and the physician’s clinical rating (PCR). Bivariate correlations were modest: NPI-CA versus PHQ-9 (r = .26), NPI-MD versus GDS (r = .20), GDS versus PCR (r = .22), NPI-MD versus PCR (r = .45). Kappa statistics and logistic regression models indicated that the NPI-CA predicted the PHQ-9 moderately (ϰ = .08, p <.001; OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.5 to 6.1). Results also indicated that the GDS did not significantly predict the PCR (ϰ = .10, p > .05; 95% CI: 0.7 to 11.2) nor the NPI-MD (ϰ = .01, p > .05; 95% CI: 0.6 to 6.3), and that the NPI-MD predicted the PCR moderately well (ϰ = .35, p < .001; OR= 11.1, 95% CI: 2.6 to 48.3). CA-NPI predicted the PHQ-9 for cognitively normal subjects (ϰ = .13, p < .001; OR = 10.1, 95% CI: 1.9 to 52.6) but not for subjects with mild impairment (ϰ = .01, p > .05; 95% CI: 0.4 to 4.3) nor dementia (ϰ = .14, p > .05; 95% CI: 0.9 to 7.8). No other variables moderated these associations. Results suggest the importance of cognitive assessment when measuring late-life depression via self-report. 2011-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/873 https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1869&amp;context=etd Copyright for this work is held by the author. Transmission or reproduction of materials protected by copyright beyond that allowed by fair use requires the written permission of the copyright owners. Works not in the public domain cannot be commercially exploited without permission of the copyright owner. Responsibility for any use rests exclusively with the user. For more information contact Andrew Wesolek (andrew.wesolek@usu.edu). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations DigitalCommons@USU dementia geriatric depression rating sources psychometrics Psychology Quantitative Psychology
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic dementia
geriatric depression
rating sources
psychometrics
Psychology
Quantitative Psychology
spellingShingle dementia
geriatric depression
rating sources
psychometrics
Psychology
Quantitative Psychology
Hatch, Daniel J.
Factors Moderating the Association between Multiple Rating Sources of Geriatric Depression: Self, Informant, and Physician
description Late-life depression is a major public health concern, associated with poor health outcomes, including doubling of dementia risk. Psychiatric evaluation is impractical in large epidemiological studies, which instead typically rely on self/informant reports, which are subject to various biases (stigma, recall). Few studies have addressed level of agreement between sources. This study examined associations between these sources and assessed whether subject and informant variables moderated these associations. In a population-based study of dementia in Cache County, Utah (2002-5), 1,480 subjects completed an in-depth clinical assessment (CA). Major depression was assessed via the self-report Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and informant-rated Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-CA). One hundred forty-eight subjects with cognitive impairment also completed a psychiatrist’s examination, including the self-report Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the informant-rated NPI (NPI-MD), and the physician’s clinical rating (PCR). Bivariate correlations were modest: NPI-CA versus PHQ-9 (r = .26), NPI-MD versus GDS (r = .20), GDS versus PCR (r = .22), NPI-MD versus PCR (r = .45). Kappa statistics and logistic regression models indicated that the NPI-CA predicted the PHQ-9 moderately (ϰ = .08, p <.001; OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.5 to 6.1). Results also indicated that the GDS did not significantly predict the PCR (ϰ = .10, p > .05; 95% CI: 0.7 to 11.2) nor the NPI-MD (ϰ = .01, p > .05; 95% CI: 0.6 to 6.3), and that the NPI-MD predicted the PCR moderately well (ϰ = .35, p < .001; OR= 11.1, 95% CI: 2.6 to 48.3). CA-NPI predicted the PHQ-9 for cognitively normal subjects (ϰ = .13, p < .001; OR = 10.1, 95% CI: 1.9 to 52.6) but not for subjects with mild impairment (ϰ = .01, p > .05; 95% CI: 0.4 to 4.3) nor dementia (ϰ = .14, p > .05; 95% CI: 0.9 to 7.8). No other variables moderated these associations. Results suggest the importance of cognitive assessment when measuring late-life depression via self-report.
author Hatch, Daniel J.
author_facet Hatch, Daniel J.
author_sort Hatch, Daniel J.
title Factors Moderating the Association between Multiple Rating Sources of Geriatric Depression: Self, Informant, and Physician
title_short Factors Moderating the Association between Multiple Rating Sources of Geriatric Depression: Self, Informant, and Physician
title_full Factors Moderating the Association between Multiple Rating Sources of Geriatric Depression: Self, Informant, and Physician
title_fullStr Factors Moderating the Association between Multiple Rating Sources of Geriatric Depression: Self, Informant, and Physician
title_full_unstemmed Factors Moderating the Association between Multiple Rating Sources of Geriatric Depression: Self, Informant, and Physician
title_sort factors moderating the association between multiple rating sources of geriatric depression: self, informant, and physician
publisher DigitalCommons@USU
publishDate 2011
url https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/873
https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1869&amp;context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT hatchdanielj factorsmoderatingtheassociationbetweenmultipleratingsourcesofgeriatricdepressionselfinformantandphysician
_version_ 1719267135554846720