Microwave Characterization of Printable Dielectric Inks Using Additive Manufacturing Methods
Two methods of dielectric characterization are presented that offer quick and cost-effective solutions for screening complex dielectric material properties. Through Direct-Print Additive Manufacturing (DPAM) methods, a dielectric material of choice is dispensed into a capacitor structure and charact...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Published: |
Scholar Commons
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7385 https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8582&context=etd |
id |
ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-8582 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-85822019-10-04T05:05:18Z Microwave Characterization of Printable Dielectric Inks Using Additive Manufacturing Methods York, Seth Two methods of dielectric characterization are presented that offer quick and cost-effective solutions for screening complex dielectric material properties. Through Direct-Print Additive Manufacturing (DPAM) methods, a dielectric material of choice is dispensed into a capacitor structure and characterized through 1-port s-parameter measurements. The presented methods use fixtures that are modeled and validated through simulation then implemented in practice. Advanced simulations are performed to gain insights which are used to optimize the dielectric characterization performance of the fixtures. Additional investigations are performed which investigate the durability of the fixture and material within by exposing the combination to rough environmental conditions for an extended duration. The presented capacitor structures are investigated to characterize dielectric materials within the bandwidth of 0.1-15 GHz, saving the time and effort required in using multiple dielectric characterization methods that cover the same bandwidth. Both methods are compared based on the results for each method achieved in practice while considering the process required perform each method. The pros and cons of the presented characterization methods are weighed which highlights the key aspects for successfully characterizing dielectric materials with each method as well as revealing the potential limitations associated with each. 2018-07-12T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7385 https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8582&context=etd Graduate Theses and Dissertations Scholar Commons Direct-Print Additive Manufacturing (DPAM) Complex Permittivity Capacitance Circuit Model S-Parameters Electrical and Computer Engineering Electromagnetics and Photonics |
collection |
NDLTD |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Direct-Print Additive Manufacturing (DPAM) Complex Permittivity Capacitance Circuit Model S-Parameters Electrical and Computer Engineering Electromagnetics and Photonics |
spellingShingle |
Direct-Print Additive Manufacturing (DPAM) Complex Permittivity Capacitance Circuit Model S-Parameters Electrical and Computer Engineering Electromagnetics and Photonics York, Seth Microwave Characterization of Printable Dielectric Inks Using Additive Manufacturing Methods |
description |
Two methods of dielectric characterization are presented that offer quick and cost-effective solutions for screening complex dielectric material properties. Through Direct-Print Additive Manufacturing (DPAM) methods, a dielectric material of choice is dispensed into a capacitor structure and characterized through 1-port s-parameter measurements. The presented methods use fixtures that are modeled and validated through simulation then implemented in practice. Advanced simulations are performed to gain insights which are used to optimize the dielectric characterization performance of the fixtures. Additional investigations are performed which investigate the durability of the fixture and material within by exposing the combination to rough environmental conditions for an extended duration. The presented capacitor structures are investigated to characterize dielectric materials within the bandwidth of 0.1-15 GHz, saving the time and effort required in using multiple dielectric characterization methods that cover the same bandwidth. Both methods are compared based on the results for each method achieved in practice while considering the process required perform each method. The pros and cons of the presented characterization methods are weighed which highlights the key aspects for successfully characterizing dielectric materials with each method as well as revealing the potential limitations associated with each. |
author |
York, Seth |
author_facet |
York, Seth |
author_sort |
York, Seth |
title |
Microwave Characterization of Printable Dielectric Inks Using Additive Manufacturing Methods |
title_short |
Microwave Characterization of Printable Dielectric Inks Using Additive Manufacturing Methods |
title_full |
Microwave Characterization of Printable Dielectric Inks Using Additive Manufacturing Methods |
title_fullStr |
Microwave Characterization of Printable Dielectric Inks Using Additive Manufacturing Methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Microwave Characterization of Printable Dielectric Inks Using Additive Manufacturing Methods |
title_sort |
microwave characterization of printable dielectric inks using additive manufacturing methods |
publisher |
Scholar Commons |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/7385 https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8582&context=etd |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yorkseth microwavecharacterizationofprintabledielectricinksusingadditivemanufacturingmethods |
_version_ |
1719260301434552320 |