A study on the calibration and accuracy of the one-step TDR method

Traditional in-situ soil compaction monitoring methods are often limited in their application, thus quality control of compacted fills and roadway embankments remains a challenging problem. As a result, new methods are being developed to more accurately measure in-situ compaction parameters. Time do...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Runkles, Brian David
Format: Others
Published: Scholar Commons 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2684
http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3683&context=etd
id ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-3683
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-36832015-09-30T04:39:47Z A study on the calibration and accuracy of the one-step TDR method Runkles, Brian David Traditional in-situ soil compaction monitoring methods are often limited in their application, thus quality control of compacted fills and roadway embankments remains a challenging problem. As a result, new methods are being developed to more accurately measure in-situ compaction parameters. Time domain reflectometry (TDR) is one such method. Several advances have been made over the past few years to further the use of TDR technology in water content and density measurement of compacted fill. The one-step method relies on the measurement of the apparent dielectric constant in conjunction with the bulk electrical conductivity, and correlates them through two soil-specific constants, f and g. The two measurements, together with other soil specific constants, are then used to back calculate the water content and density in a single step. However, questions remain regarding the accuracy and bias of TDR measurements in relation to other "established" in-situ procedures such as the nuclear gage and speedy moisture. Results from an experimental program to obtain calibration constants for typical sands used in roadway construction are presented. A number of side-by-side tests are performed to compare the measurements obtained using the TDR one-step method to those obtained form other methods. Conducting such side-by-side tests is a critical step in the progress and eventual widespread usage of the one-step method. In addition, all the results are compared against an independent measurement of the in-place density from a slurry-replacement method. The objective of the independent measurement is to provide a baseline for accurate and unbiased evaluation of TDR and other technologies. 2006-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2684 http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3683&context=etd default Graduate Theses and Dissertations Scholar Commons Water content Dry density Dielectric constant Electrical conductivity Nuclear American Studies Arts and Humanities
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Water content
Dry density
Dielectric constant
Electrical conductivity
Nuclear
American Studies
Arts and Humanities
spellingShingle Water content
Dry density
Dielectric constant
Electrical conductivity
Nuclear
American Studies
Arts and Humanities
Runkles, Brian David
A study on the calibration and accuracy of the one-step TDR method
description Traditional in-situ soil compaction monitoring methods are often limited in their application, thus quality control of compacted fills and roadway embankments remains a challenging problem. As a result, new methods are being developed to more accurately measure in-situ compaction parameters. Time domain reflectometry (TDR) is one such method. Several advances have been made over the past few years to further the use of TDR technology in water content and density measurement of compacted fill. The one-step method relies on the measurement of the apparent dielectric constant in conjunction with the bulk electrical conductivity, and correlates them through two soil-specific constants, f and g. The two measurements, together with other soil specific constants, are then used to back calculate the water content and density in a single step. However, questions remain regarding the accuracy and bias of TDR measurements in relation to other "established" in-situ procedures such as the nuclear gage and speedy moisture. Results from an experimental program to obtain calibration constants for typical sands used in roadway construction are presented. A number of side-by-side tests are performed to compare the measurements obtained using the TDR one-step method to those obtained form other methods. Conducting such side-by-side tests is a critical step in the progress and eventual widespread usage of the one-step method. In addition, all the results are compared against an independent measurement of the in-place density from a slurry-replacement method. The objective of the independent measurement is to provide a baseline for accurate and unbiased evaluation of TDR and other technologies.
author Runkles, Brian David
author_facet Runkles, Brian David
author_sort Runkles, Brian David
title A study on the calibration and accuracy of the one-step TDR method
title_short A study on the calibration and accuracy of the one-step TDR method
title_full A study on the calibration and accuracy of the one-step TDR method
title_fullStr A study on the calibration and accuracy of the one-step TDR method
title_full_unstemmed A study on the calibration and accuracy of the one-step TDR method
title_sort study on the calibration and accuracy of the one-step tdr method
publisher Scholar Commons
publishDate 2006
url http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2684
http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3683&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT runklesbriandavid astudyonthecalibrationandaccuracyoftheonesteptdrmethod
AT runklesbriandavid studyonthecalibrationandaccuracyoftheonesteptdrmethod
_version_ 1716825115650424832