Utility of Positive Peer Reporting to Improve Interactions Among Children in Foster Care

This study investigated the utility of positive peer reporting to improve placement outcomes in foster care settings. Rejected children are likely to exhibit disruptive behavior problems due to frequent negative interactions with their peers, augmenting an already unstable environment in foster care...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Van Horn, Jenny L
Format: Others
Published: Scholar Commons 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1281
https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2280&context=etd
id ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-2280
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-USF-oai-scholarcommons.usf.edu-etd-22802019-10-04T05:25:40Z Utility of Positive Peer Reporting to Improve Interactions Among Children in Foster Care Van Horn, Jenny L This study investigated the utility of positive peer reporting to improve placement outcomes in foster care settings. Rejected children are likely to exhibit disruptive behavior problems due to frequent negative interactions with their peers, augmenting an already unstable environment in foster care. Researchers have found positive peer reporting to be successful in increasing social status and positive interactions and reducing negative interactions. Utilizing a multiple baseline with reversal elements, this study examined the effects of positive peer reporting on the positive and negative interactions of socially rejected children in foster care settings. Results supported previous literature with the first participant's positive interactions increasing from a mean of 16.67% in baseline to 55.63% during treatment; this was the final phase after a placement change. The second participant's positive interactions increased from a baseline average of 8.6% to a mean of 52.67% after positive peer reporting was implemented. Percentages reversed to near-baseline levels when treatment conditions were removed, averaging 21.5%. Fading procedures returned positive interactions to 41.39%, and these levels maintained across the final baseline, averaging 40%. 2004-09-16T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1281 https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2280&context=etd default Graduate Theses and Dissertations Scholar Commons social rejection peer acceptance foster homes peer relationships negative interactions American Studies Arts and Humanities
collection NDLTD
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic social rejection
peer acceptance
foster homes
peer relationships
negative interactions
American Studies
Arts and Humanities
spellingShingle social rejection
peer acceptance
foster homes
peer relationships
negative interactions
American Studies
Arts and Humanities
Van Horn, Jenny L
Utility of Positive Peer Reporting to Improve Interactions Among Children in Foster Care
description This study investigated the utility of positive peer reporting to improve placement outcomes in foster care settings. Rejected children are likely to exhibit disruptive behavior problems due to frequent negative interactions with their peers, augmenting an already unstable environment in foster care. Researchers have found positive peer reporting to be successful in increasing social status and positive interactions and reducing negative interactions. Utilizing a multiple baseline with reversal elements, this study examined the effects of positive peer reporting on the positive and negative interactions of socially rejected children in foster care settings. Results supported previous literature with the first participant's positive interactions increasing from a mean of 16.67% in baseline to 55.63% during treatment; this was the final phase after a placement change. The second participant's positive interactions increased from a baseline average of 8.6% to a mean of 52.67% after positive peer reporting was implemented. Percentages reversed to near-baseline levels when treatment conditions were removed, averaging 21.5%. Fading procedures returned positive interactions to 41.39%, and these levels maintained across the final baseline, averaging 40%.
author Van Horn, Jenny L
author_facet Van Horn, Jenny L
author_sort Van Horn, Jenny L
title Utility of Positive Peer Reporting to Improve Interactions Among Children in Foster Care
title_short Utility of Positive Peer Reporting to Improve Interactions Among Children in Foster Care
title_full Utility of Positive Peer Reporting to Improve Interactions Among Children in Foster Care
title_fullStr Utility of Positive Peer Reporting to Improve Interactions Among Children in Foster Care
title_full_unstemmed Utility of Positive Peer Reporting to Improve Interactions Among Children in Foster Care
title_sort utility of positive peer reporting to improve interactions among children in foster care
publisher Scholar Commons
publishDate 2004
url https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1281
https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2280&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT vanhornjennyl utilityofpositivepeerreportingtoimproveinteractionsamongchildreninfostercare
_version_ 1719261193366929408