Neuropsychological concomitants of major depression

The limits of the cognitive deficits associated with depression were investigated with a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. In addition, the various perspectives regarding the mechanism responsible for the cognitive changes were investigated using a dual-task paradigm. By comparing a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hillis, Sarah
Other Authors: Crossley, Margaret
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: University of Saskatchewan 1997
Online Access:http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-10212004-000434
id ndltd-USASK-oai-usask.ca-etd-10212004-000434
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-USASK-oai-usask.ca-etd-10212004-0004342013-01-08T16:31:39Z Neuropsychological concomitants of major depression Hillis, Sarah The limits of the cognitive deficits associated with depression were investigated with a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. In addition, the various perspectives regarding the mechanism responsible for the cognitive changes were investigated using a dual-task paradigm. By comparing a clinically depressed group and a non-depressed control group as they performed a finger tapping task and either a simultaneous automatic or a relatively attention-demanding cognitive task, it was possible to address the issue of depression-related decreases in processing capacity. The proportional change in tapping rate, in the dual-task condition, relative to the single-task condition, served as an indicator of the resources necessary to perform the cognitive task. By comparing responsiveness to a task emphasis manipulation, designed to shift priority from a manual to a cognitive task, it was possible to address the issue of resource allocation. Finally, by comparing left- and right-hand decrement scores during simultaneous performance of either a verbal or a spatial task, it was possible to address the issue of hemispheric specialization. The results do not provide strong support for the theory of a decrease in central capacity in major depression. Instead, the findings are suggestive of a capacity limitation specific to processing spatial information. As such, the findings are more consistent with a multiple resource model of attention. In addition, the results offer some support for the model of impaired allocation of attentional resources in response to task demands. Finally, the results are suggestive of atypical hemispheric involvement when processing information in the depressed state. Crossley, Margaret University of Saskatchewan 1997-01-01 text application/pdf http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-10212004-000434 http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-10212004-000434 en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Saskatchewan or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
description The limits of the cognitive deficits associated with depression were investigated with a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests. In addition, the various perspectives regarding the mechanism responsible for the cognitive changes were investigated using a dual-task paradigm. By comparing a clinically depressed group and a non-depressed control group as they performed a finger tapping task and either a simultaneous automatic or a relatively attention-demanding cognitive task, it was possible to address the issue of depression-related decreases in processing capacity. The proportional change in tapping rate, in the dual-task condition, relative to the single-task condition, served as an indicator of the resources necessary to perform the cognitive task. By comparing responsiveness to a task emphasis manipulation, designed to shift priority from a manual to a cognitive task, it was possible to address the issue of resource allocation. Finally, by comparing left- and right-hand decrement scores during simultaneous performance of either a verbal or a spatial task, it was possible to address the issue of hemispheric specialization. The results do not provide strong support for the theory of a decrease in central capacity in major depression. Instead, the findings are suggestive of a capacity limitation specific to processing spatial information. As such, the findings are more consistent with a multiple resource model of attention. In addition, the results offer some support for the model of impaired allocation of attentional resources in response to task demands. Finally, the results are suggestive of atypical hemispheric involvement when processing information in the depressed state.
author2 Crossley, Margaret
author_facet Crossley, Margaret
Hillis, Sarah
author Hillis, Sarah
spellingShingle Hillis, Sarah
Neuropsychological concomitants of major depression
author_sort Hillis, Sarah
title Neuropsychological concomitants of major depression
title_short Neuropsychological concomitants of major depression
title_full Neuropsychological concomitants of major depression
title_fullStr Neuropsychological concomitants of major depression
title_full_unstemmed Neuropsychological concomitants of major depression
title_sort neuropsychological concomitants of major depression
publisher University of Saskatchewan
publishDate 1997
url http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-10212004-000434
work_keys_str_mv AT hillissarah neuropsychologicalconcomitantsofmajordepression
_version_ 1716531891952156672